Review Article
‘Why don’t you just use a condom?’: Understanding the motivational tensions in the minds of South African women
Submitted: 04 May 2009 | Published: 07 May 2010
About the author(s)
Rachel Mash, Fikelela AIDS Project Anglican Diocese of Cape Town / Stellenbosch University Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, South AfricaBob Mash, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Pierre de Villiers, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Abstract
Objectives: To better understand the complexity of the decision that women must make when they are asked to negotiate condom use with their partner.
Method: A literature review.
Results: A key theme that emerged included unequal power in sexual decision making, with men dominating and women being disempowered. Women may want to please their partner, who might believe that condoms will reduce sexual pleasure. The use of condoms was associated with a perceived lack of ‘real’ love, intimacy and trust. Other factors included the fear of losing one’s reputation, being seen as ‘loose’ and of violence or rejection by one’s partner. For many women, condom usage was forbidden by their religious beliefs. The article presents a conceptual framework to make sense of the motivational dilemma in the mind of a woman who is asked to use a condom.
Conclusion: Understanding this ambivalence, respecting it and helping women to resolve it may be more helpful than simply telling women to use a condom. A prevention worker who fails to recognise this dilemma and instructs women to ‘simply’ use a condom, may well encounter resistance.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 8721Total article views: 34231
Crossref Citations
1. Women’s motivations for participating in the dapivirine vaginal ring open label extension study
Kalendri Naidoo, Elizabeth T. Montgomery, Ariana W. K. Katz, Morgan Garcia, Sarita Naidoo, Leila E. Mansoor
AIDS Care vol: 36 issue: 3 first page: 326 year: 2024
doi: 10.1080/09540121.2023.2260145