About the Author(s)


Danladi I. Musa Email symbol
Department of Human Kinetics and Health Education, Faculty of Education, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Nigeria

Daniel T. Goon symbol
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, South Africa

Rafiu O. Okuneye symbol
Department of Human Kinetics, Sports and Health Education, Faculty of Education, Lagos State University, Lagos, Nigeria

Mary O. Onoja-Alexander symbol
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Nigeria

Joseph I. Momoh symbol
Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Nigeria

Tessy O. Angba symbol
Department of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Education, National Open University, Abuja, Nigeria

Citation


Musa DI, Goon DT, Okuneye RO, Onoja-Alexander MO, Momoh JI, Angba TO. Visceral adiposity index, fitness and clustered cardiovascular disease risk in adolescents. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2024;16(1), a4474. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4474

Original Research

Visceral adiposity index, fitness and clustered cardiovascular disease risk in adolescents

Danladi I. Musa, Daniel T. Goon, Rafiu O. Okuneye, Mary O. Onoja-Alexander, Joseph I. Momoh, Tessy O. Angba

Received: 24 Jan. 2024; Accepted: 06 Apr. 2024; Published: 29 June 2024

Copyright: © 2024. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: Clustering of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors have been observed in children and adolescents, but its association with visceral adiposity index (VAI) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in adolescents has rarely been studied.

Aim: This study determines the independent associations of VAI and CRF with the clustering of cardiovascular disease risk (CVDr) among Nigerian adolescents.

Setting: Adolescents from specific secondary schools in Kogi East, North Central Nigeria participated in the study.

Methods: A cross-sectional sample of 403 adolescents (202 boys and 201 girls) aged 11 years – 19 years were evaluated for VAI, CRF and CVDr. Using identified risk factors, a clustered CVDr score was generated. The association between VAI, CRF and clustered CVDr was evaluated using regression models that controlled for age, gender and maturity status.

Results: Fitness was negatively associated with CVDr (β = -0.268, p < 0.001), while VAI was positively correlated with CVDr (β = 0.379, p < 0.001). After CRF or VAI adjustment, the independent association with the dependent variable remained significant. The odds of an adolescent with elevated VAI being at risk of CVD was 4.7 times higher than his peers. Unfit adolescents were 2.1 times more likely to develop CVDr.

Conclusion: Both VAI and CRF were independently associated with the clustering of CVDr in Nigerian adolescents. The findings suggest that health promotion efforts focusing on healthy diet and aerobic-type physical activity programmes should be encouraged among the youth to reduce the risk of CVD.

Contribution: This study shows that improving visceral adipose tissue and fitness may lower CVD risk factors in adolescents, which is significant for public health.

Keywords: adolescents; abdominal adiposity; fitness; cardiovascular health; primary prevention.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is widely recognised as the major cause of disability and mortality among adults worldwide.1 The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that CVD contributed to 32% of all deaths worldwide in 2019; almost 75% of these deaths occurred in low- and middle-income nations.2 Although CVD is predominantly a problem for adults, it begins in childhood.3,4 Additionally, there is evidence of CVD and metabolic risk factor clustering in children and adolescents,5,6 which persists throughout adulthood.7 As a result, early identification of at-risk adolescents is crucial for primary prevention and a better health prospect. Considering the absence of commonly acknowledged diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the youth population, a continuous MetS score has been proposed for youth research.8 This method has been used by many researchers.5,6

Primary prevention of CVD risk factors, as well as an understanding of their interconnections, are important strategies for reducing the epidemic. Blood lipid profile parameters, obesity and physical inactivity are all strong predictors of CVD in adults9,10 and youth.5,11 Several cross-sectional11,12 and prospective studies13,14 have shown that individuals with high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) are at reduced risk of MetS, CVD and all-cause mortality.1,15 Recently, there has been increased focus on the function of visceral fat (VAT) in the development and promotion of a variety of health problems, including subclinical inflammation, insulin resistance and coronary atherosclerosis.16,17 The visceral adiposity index (VAI), which quantifies VAT dysfunction, exhibits a significant correlation with insulin resistance and cardiovascular events among the adult population.18,19 The VAI combines anthropometric measurements of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) with blood lipid parameters, namely triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The VAI is a recognised biomarker for noncommunicable diseases in adults, including MetS and CVD.10,20

Several studies have evaluated the relationships between physical activity or CRF and individual CVDs21,22 or the clustering of CVD risk scores5,12,13 in children and adolescents. These studies have demonstrated that higher levels of CRF are linked to a reduced occurrence of CVD clustering. However, there is hardly any study that examined the combined association of CRF and VAI with the risk of clustered CVD in adolescents to date. Weight disorders, especially overweight (OW) and obesity, are major aetiological factors for increased cardiovascular disease risk (CVDr) in adolescents.7,21 Despite the clinical importance of VAI and its co-morbidities in adults, there is limited information on the influence of this biomarker of cardiometabolic disease on cardiovascular health in adolescents. Furthermore, there has been little research into the relationship among VAI, CRF and CVD risk, particularly among adolescents. This study has three goals. Firstly, this study examines the independent and joint associations of VAI and CRF with clustered CVD in North-Central Nigerian adolescents. Secondly, it characterised participants’ CVD risk profiles using a clustered CVD risk score. Finally, the study determined the values of the independent variables that indicate a clustering of CVD risk among participants. Information on the interrelationships between these variables may serve as key public health promotion targets in the prevention and management of CVD in adolescents.

Research methods and design

Study setting and design

From selected secondary schools in Kogi East, North Central Nigeria, a cross-sectional study was undertaken involving schoolboys and girls aged 11 years to 19 years, who were early maturers based on age at peak height velocity. The data collection timeframe for the project lasted from September to December 2019.

Study population and sampling strategy

The study participants comprised 418 adolescents who were randomly selected across four secondary schools from the study area using the adjusted Taro Yamani sample size determination formula.24 The calculation resulted in 380 participants as the minimum size, which was increased to 403 participants to improve representativeness, and to account for possible attrition usually associated with data collection. A comprehensive description of the study setting, eligibility criteria, sampling technique and pilot test had been described previously.21 Once appropriate authorisation from the heads of the participating schools was obtained, the participants were given a detailed explanation of the study’s goals and testing protocols.

Data collection procedure

The testing team visited the participating schools twice to collect data. During the first visit, physical attributes and fitness were measured, while the final appointment was for the measurement of clinical and biochemical parameters. To ensure consistency, all tests were performed sequentially by the same members of the testing team throughout the project.

Physical and physiological measurements

Participants’ physical characteristics were assessed in accordance with the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) procedures.25 Stature, body mass, percentage of body fat, WC and BMI were assessed using anthropometric methods.21 Participants were grouped as healthy weight (HW) and OW based on their BMI values.26 Sexual maturity was estimated from chronological age and stature using Moore et al.’s prediction equation.27 Maturity off-set (MO) was estimated directly from the formula. The difference between MO and age determines APHV.

Resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were assessed after each participant sat quietly for 10 min with an automated device (HEM-705 CP; Omron, Tokyo, Japan). The data were collected three times, at a 2-min interval, and the mean value was used for analysis. The blood pressure cut-off for hypertension (HTN) was determined using an established standard.28

Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed by the 20-m multistage shuttle run test (20-MST). The test is an aerobic capacity test with increasing intensity. Throughout the test, participants were encouraged verbally to run until volitional fatigue. The test is considered a valid predictor of peak oxygen uptake in youth.29 The number of laps or shuttles completed by each participant was used to estimate CRF.29 The test’s specific administrative procedures and participant classification into fitness categories have been published.26

Clinical and Biochemical measurement

Fasting plasma total cholesterol (TCL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C, TG and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were measured from capillary blood samples between 9:00 and 11:00. using the Cardio-Check Plus Analyzer (CCPA) (PTS Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA).21 Two qualified nurses and a laboratory technologist performed the test. Participants were given a 10-min rest period before taking their turns for the test. The protocol’s details were previously described.21 The CCPA measures blood lipids accurately.30 Visceral adiposity index was calculated using the formula of Amato and Colleagues19:

where, WC was expressed in centimetres, BMI in kg.m−2, HDL-C and TG in mMol.L−2.

Clustered cardiovascular disease risk score

While it is difficult to identify variations between individual risk factors among youth,8 a clustered CVDr score was derived by summing the sex-standardised residuals (Z-scores) for SBP, DBP, TCL, LDL-C, HDL-C (inverted) and TG. A lower clustered CVDr score is suggestive of a more favourable risk factor profile. This method has been employed in a variety of youth research.23,31 Participants with a CVDr score +1SD higher than the overall mean were deemed to be at risk of clustered CVD.32

We assessed CVDr abnormalities using the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria33: TG (≥ 1.7 mMol.L−1), HDL-C (≤ 1.04 mMol.L−1) and FPG (≥ 5.6 mMol.L−1). Adolescents who had one or more risks were categorised as ‘at risk’, while those who had none were classified as ‘no risk’. As there is no defined cut-off value for VAI that separates normal from dysfunctional visceral adiposity in the paediatric population, the sample was divided into tertiles, with the lowest value of the highest tertile serving as the threshold.33 The sample’s benchmark was 1.1 (girls = 1.35; boys = 0.83). This method is regarded as a useful estimate of the VAI benchmark and has been employed by various scholars.18,34

Data analysis

Means, standard deviations, frequencies and percentages were used to represent descriptive data. The normality of distribution was checked for all variables using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Because of absenteeism and incomplete data, 403 out of 418 adolescents completed the measurements. Therefore, data for all variables were available for 403 participants that were used in statistical analysis. This amounted to a participation rate of 96%. Significant differences between genders on all study variables were determined with the independent samples t-test or, where appropriate, the Mann–Whitney U test. Because there was no significant interaction between age, biological maturity and gender, all analyses were performed with both sexes pooled to enhance statistical power. Bivariate analyses were performed to examine partial correlations among the CVDr, VAI and CRF. The relationships between VAI and CRF, as well as their relative importance, were examined using multivariate regression models while adjusting for sex, age and sexual maturation. The logistic regression model assessed the independent association of VAI and CRF with CVDr. The independent variables’ predictive performance was examined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC), with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Values of the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were used to identify CVDr benchmarks. The AUC values were interpreted using Swets’ technique.35 The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was utilised for analyses, with p-values ≤ 0.05 deemed statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences, Kogi State University, Nigeria (Ref. No. COHS/02/25/2020). Parents or guardians and participants provided written informed consent and assent, respectively, prior to data collection. The Declaration of Helsinki was adhered to for ethical guidelines.

Results

Table 1 displays the participants’ general characteristics. Girls had greater BMI (p < 0.001), body mass (p = 0.016), MO (p < 0.001) and WC (p = 0.001) compared to boys. Age, stature, FPG, DBP, TG and HDL-C were similar between sexes (p > 0.05). Boys had more favourable SBP (p = 0.016), TC (p = 0.028), LDL-C (p = 0.028), the independent variables (p < 0.001) and the dependent variable (p = 0.005) compared to girls. Participants’ CVD risk profiles are presented in Table 2. Aside from the TC and LDL-C, which had similar characteristics for both boys and girls, all other risk factors differed significantly across sexes, with girls being more vulnerable than boys. In terms of the proportion of participants at risk for different health parameters, boys were more vulnerable (Figure 1). In general, a preponderance of adolescents was at risk of low fitness (49.1%), followed by elevated VAI (33.5%).

FIGURE 1: Participants’ cardiometabolic disease risk profile stratified by sex.

TABLE 1: General characteristics of participants stratified by gender (N = 403).
TABLE 2: Comparison of participants according to level of cardiovascular disease risk (N = 403).

The multivariate regression models were adjusted for sex, age and maturity status (Table 3). The dependent variable was significantly associated with CRF (r = 0.241) and VAI (r = 0.398). The correlations were weak to moderate. Visceral adiposity index correlated positively with CVDr (p < 0.001), explaining 15% of the variance in CVD risk. A rise in VAI units could result in a mean increase of CVDr by 1.2. Cardiorespiratory fitness was negatively associated with the dependent variable (p < 0.001) and accounted for 5% of CVDr variation. Each unit (lap) increase in CRF was associated with an average decrease of 0.93 in CVDr. Despite additional adjustments in model 2 for either CRF or VAI, the independent association with CVDr remained statistically significant (p < 0.001).

TABLE 3: Standardised regression summary on the relationship among visceral adiposity index, cardiorespiratory fitness and clustered cardiovascular disease risk.

Results of the logistic regression model after adjustment for the covariates showed that independent variables displayed a significant effect, with VAI demonstrating a greater explanatory power. Visceral adiposity index (OR = 4.7, 95%CI = 2.80–7.78, p < 0.001) was positively associated with the dependent variable, while CRF (OR = 2.1, 95%CI = 1.23–3.59, p = 0.006) was negatively related with the dependent variable. The odds of CVD risk among adolescents with elevated VAI was 4.7 folds compared to peers with favourable VAI levels. Furthermore, the likelihood of an unfit adolescent being at risk of CVD was 2.1 times that of a fit counterpart.

Results of the ROC analyses are presented in Table 4 and Figure 2. Only the AUC for VAI was significant in both sexes (p < 0.001), while that for CRF was not (p > 0.05). The VAI threshold for girls was 0.796 and that for boys was 0.570, with high sensitivity and low specificity.

FIGURE 2: Sex-specific areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of visceral adiposity index for (a) girls and (b) boys.

TABLE 4: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for risk of clustered cardiorespiratory fitness among participants.

Discussion

There is a growing body of evidence from studies in the western societies demonstrating that increased VAT and poor fitness may expose youth to CVDr.36,37 Although, CVD is becoming an increasingly important health issue in sub-Saharan Africa, even among young persons, the importance of visceral and subcutaneous fat tissues, as well as fitness in the development of CVD has received little attention in African adolescents, particularly in Nigeria. Key findings from this study include: CVD risk factor clustering exists among the study participants. Levels of VAI, CRF and other health indices were more favourable in adolescents with lower CVD risk. The independent variables and CVDr have weak to moderate relationships. Visceral adiposity index and CRF separately and jointly predicted CVDr, explaining 19% of the variance in the dependent variable, with VAI demonstrating greater explanatory power. The cut-off values for girls and boys of 0.796 and 0.570, respectively, are significantly lower than those documented for Caucasian and non-African youth.

This study’s findings demonstrated the existence of CVD risk factor clustering within this cohort of adolescents, with boys (8.4%) having a higher prevalence than girls (7.0%). Clustering has also been observed in different populations of youth globally.14,23,38 The overall prevalence of 7.7% recorded in this study appears to be higher than the reported rates of 5% and 5.4% for Iranian39 and Danish38 children, respectively. However, the prevalence rate of 11.9% among Norwegian children23 is substantially higher than that of the present study. Mean values for all CVD risk factors, apart from TCL and LDL-C are significantly more favourable in adolescents who had no risk of CVDr than in those who were at risk. This has been observed in previous research.23 Considering the vulnerability of participants to CVD risks, our study showed that, of the health indicators assessed, greater proportions of participants were at increased risk of low fitness and elevated VAI (Figure 1). These data demonstrate that visceral adipose tissue dysfunction and low fitness are more serious health issues than general or abdominal fat and plasma glucose abnormalities among the participants.

This study shows that both VAI and fitness independently predict clustered CVDr, with VAI displaying greater explanatory power. Earlier studies have reported similar findings with respect to VAI among children and adolescents17,39 showing significant associations between VAI and cardiometabolic disease risk factors in Asian youth and further concluding that VAI could be used as a surrogate marker of visceral adipose tissue and as a good indicator of MetS in the paediatric population.17,39 A study of obese Turkish girls documented similar findings.40 The contribution of VAI and fitness in predicting the dependent variable in the present study can be considered moderate (19%), and these results suggest that VAI is more important than fitness for predicting clustered CVDr in this cohort of adolescents. The present study provides evidence that improvement in both VAI and CRF could reduce CVD risk in youth and may be of public health significance. However, there is a caveat in the use of VAI in the paediatric population because its formula was derived from the BMI, WC, TG and HDL-C of Caucasian adults.17,19 In this study, VAI has demonstrated a unique association with clustered CVDr. Our findings therefore reinforce the applicability of VAI as an estimate of VAT dysfunction and cardiometabolic risk in adolescents, including those in Africa. Therefore, further studies in African children and adolescents are required to establish the validity of VAI in this population.

In our study, VAI was found to be a better predictor of the dependent variable than CRF. Indeed, the AUC for CRF was not significant in both sexes. These results suggest that visceral adipose tissue dysfunction may be a more serious health problem among adolescents. Visceral obesity is known to be associated with several co-morbidities including, increased adipocytokine production and proinflammatory biomarkers, HTN, dyslipidemia, decreased insulin sensitivity, increased risk of diabetes, atherosclerosis and mortality rates.18,41 It has also been documented that persons with higher levels of VAT also have correspondingly higher levels of inflammatory cytokines such as C-reactive proteins, interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α, all of which may result in the development of insulin resistance and metabolic abnormalities.42 Furthermore, fat cells around the abdomen release fat into blood vessels, thereby increasing the risk of MetS and CVD.43,44 Evidently, adipose tissue dysfunction is a serious health problem that requires intervention, even at the early stage of life. These results, therefore, highlight the need to encourage the consumption of a healthy diet and maintaining an active lifestyle, which could lead to achieving optimal cardiovascular health among adolescents.

Based on the findings from this study, it is plausible to assume that the association of increased visceral adipose tissue dysfunction and low fitness with the risk of CVD may be a result of unhealthy nutrition and sub-optimal physical activity.22,42 Furthermore, findings from this study suggest that having a lower VAI and a higher CRF might be important targets for maintaining and promoting cardiovascular health in youth.

One of the limitations of this study is the cross-sectional design that precludes the determination of causal association among the independent and dependent variables. In addition, the bulk of participants came from the Igala ethnic group of Kogi State, which is not representative of the multiracial Nigerian population. This obviously limits the generalisability of the study’s findings to other populations of youth in Nigeria. Therefore, a national population-based or multi-centre as well as longitudinal study is advocated. However, one key aspect of this study is the utilisation of ROC, which offered population-specific benchmarks for VAI in assessing participants’ CVD risk.

Conclusion

Findings from this study demonstrated significant independent associations between VAI and CRF with CVDr in Nigerian adolescents, and the association persisted after adjusting for potential confounders. The combination of VAI and CRF in predicting the risk of CVD was weak to moderate. Thus, VAI and CRF could be explored as cost-effective and convenient tools for CVDr assessment in adolescents.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their profound gratitude to the heads, teachers and students of the participating schools who made the study possible. The efforts of the research assistants are also gratefully acknowledged.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions

All authors worked towards the successful execution of the study. D.I.M. conceived the study, participated in the data collection and data analysis, drafted the manuscript and created all the tables and figures. D.T.G. participated in the data analysis, literature search and preparation of the manuscript. R.O.O. participated in the literature search and preparation of the manuscript. M.O.O.-A., J.I.M. and T.O.A. supervised the study design and participated in the data collection and literature search. All authors have read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Funding information

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, D.I.M., upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. It does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings, and content.

References

  1. Stevenson J, Cai J, Evenson KR, Thomas R. Fitness and fatness as predictors of mortality from all-causes and cardiovascular diseases in men and women in the Lipid Research Clinic Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(9):832–841. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf114
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Cardiovascular diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
  3. Kavey RE, Daniel SR, Lauer RM, Atkins DL, Hayman LL, Taubert K. American Heart Association Guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beginning in childhood. Circulation. 2003;107(11):1562–1566. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000061521.15730.6E
  4. Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao WH, Newman NP, Tracey PE, Wattigney WA. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. N Eng J Med. 1988;388:1650–1656. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199806043382302
  5. Musa DI, Toriola AL, Goon DT, Jonathan SU. Association of fitness and fatness with clustered cardiovascular disease risk factors in Nigerian adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165861
  6. Artero EG, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, et al. Muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness are independently associated with metabolic risks in adolescents: The HELENA Study. Ped Diabetes. 2011;12(8):704–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00769.x
  7. Davidson LE, Hunt SC, Adams TD. Fitness versus adiposity in cardiovascular disease risk. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019;73:225–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-018-0333-5
  8. Khan R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M. The metabolic syndrome: Time for critical appraisal: Joint Statement from the American Diabetic Association and European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2005;28(9):2289–304. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.9.2289
  9. Bugge A, EL-Naaman B, Mc Murray RG, Froberg K, Andersen LB. Tracking of clustered disease risk factors from childhood to adolescents. Pediatr Res. 2013;73:245–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2012.158
  10. Kouli GM, Panagiotakos DB, Kyrou I, et al. Visceral adiposity index and 10-year cardiovascular disease incidence: The ATTICA Study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;27(10):881–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2017.06.015
  11. Kwon S, Burns TL, Janz K. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness and fatness with cardiovascular risk factors among adolescents: The NHANES 1999–2002. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(6):746–753. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.7.6.746
  12. Buchan DS, Young JD, Boddy LM, Malina RM, Baker JS. Fitness and adiposity are independently associated with cardiometabolic risk in youth. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013;261698. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/261698
  13. Ruiz R, Sui X, Lobelo F, et al. Association between muscular strength and mortality in men: Prospective cohort study. BJM. 2008;337(7661):92–95. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a439
  14. Twisk W, Kemper C, Van Mechelen W. Tracking of activity and fitness and the relationship with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(8):1455–1461. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200008000-00014
  15. Musa DI, Toriola AL, Jonathan SU, Abubakar NO. Aerobic fitness and the risk of metabolic syndrome in adolescents. Ind J Public Health Res Dev. 2021;12(3):330–338. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v12i3.16082
  16. Libby P, Okamoto Y, Rocha VZ, Folco E. Inflammation in atherosclerosis: Transition from theory to practice. Circ J. 2010;74(2):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-09-0706
  17. Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Alokail M, et al. Does visceral adiposity index signify early metabolic risk in children and adolescents? Association with insulin resistance, adipokines and subclinical inflammation. Pediatr Res. 2014;75(3):459–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.229
  18. Amato MC, Giordano C, Pitrone M, Gulluzo A. Cut-off points of visceral adiposity index (VAI) identifying a visceral adipose dysfunction associated with cardiometabolic risk in Caucasian Sicilian population. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:183. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511x-10-183
  19. Amato MC, Giordano C. Visceral adiposity index: An indicator of adipose tissue dysfunction. Intern J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:730827. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/730827
  20. Zhang Z, Shi D, Zhang Q, et al. Visceral adiposity index (VAI), a powerful predictor of incident hypertension in prehypertensives. Intern Emerg Med. 2018;13(4):509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-018-1836-8
  21. Musa DI, Toriola AL, Abubakar NO, Omachi S, Olowoleni BV, Ayodele KB. Association of adiposity and fitness with triglycerides-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in youth. Ann Ped Cardiol. 2023;16(3):194–200. https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_1_23
  22. Moliner-Urdiales D, Ruiz JR, Vincente-Rodriguez G, et al. Association of muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness with total and central body fat in adolescents: The HELENA Study. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(2):101–108. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.062430
  23. Resaland GK, Mamen A, Boreham C, Anderssen SA, Andersen LB. Cardiovascular risk factor clustering and its association with fitness in nine-year-old rural Norwegian children. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(1):e112–e120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00921.x
  24. Adams AM. Sample size determination in survey research. J Sci Res Rep. 2020;26(5):90–97. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2020/v26i530263
  25. Marfell-Jones M, Stweart AD, De Ridder JH. International standards for anthropometric assessment [homepage on the Internet]. Wellington: International Society for the Advancement of Kinantropometry; 2012, p. 32–89. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11072/1510
  26. The Cooper Institute. FITNESSGRAM Test Administration Manual. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2017, p. 39–64.
  27. Moore SA, McKay HA, Macdonald H, Nettlefold L, Baxter-Jones AD, Cameron N, Brasher PMA. Enhancing somatic maturity prediction model. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(8):1755–1764. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000588
  28. National High Blood Pressure Education Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescent. Pediatrics. 2004;114:555–576. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.114.2.S2.555
  29. Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640418808729800
  30. Gao Y, Zhu CG, Wu NQ, et al. Study on the reliability of CadioCheck Plus Analyzer for measuring lipid profile. J Peking Uni Health Sci. 2016;48:523–528.
  31. Sasayama K, Ochi E, Adachi M. Importance of both fatness and aerobic fitness on metabolic syndrome risk in Japanese children. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127400
  32. Sardinha LB, Santos DA, Silva AM, Grontved A, Andersen LB, Ekelund U. A comparison between BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio for identifying cardio-metabolic risks in children and adolescents. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e014951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149351
  33. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Kaufman F, et al. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents – An IDF Consensus Report. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007;8(5):299–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00271.x
  34. Bagyura Z, Kiss L, Lux A, et al. Association between coronary atherosclerosis and visceral adiposity index. Nutr Metab Cadiov Dis. 2020;30(5):796–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2020.01.013
  35. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240(4857):1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615
  36. Caprio S, Hyman LD, McCarthy S, Lange R, Bronson M, Tanborlane WV. Fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in obese adolescent girls: Importance of the intra-abdominal fat depot. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(1):12–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/64.1.12
  37. Mathieu P, Pibarot P, Larose E, Poirier P, Marette A, Despres JP. Visceral obesity and the heart. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40(5):821–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2007.12.001
  38. Anderssen LB, Bugge A, Denker M, Eiberg S, EL-Naaman B. The association between physical activity, physical fitness and development of metabolic disorders. Int J Pediatr. 2011;6(suppl. 1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.3109/17477166.2011.606816
  39. Ejtahed HS, Kelishadi R, Hasani-Ranjbar S, et al. Discriminatory ability of visceral adiposity index as an indicator for modelling cardiometabolic risk factors in pediatric population: The CASPIAN-V Study. J Cardiovasc Thoracic Res. 2019;11(4):280–286. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2019.46
  40. Pekgor S, Duran C, Berberoglu U, Eryilmaz MA. The role of visceral adiposity index in predicting the presence of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in overweight and obese patients. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2019;17(5):296–302. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2019.0005
  41. Chen F, Liu J, Yan Y, et al. Abnormal metabolic phenotypes among urban Chinese children: Epidemiology and the impact of DXA-measured body composition. Obesity. 2019;27(5):837–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22426
  42. Dong Y, Bai L, Cai R, Zhou J, Ding W. Visceral adiposity index performed better than traditional adiposity indicators in predicting unhealthy metabolic phenotype among Chinese children and adolescents. Sci Rep. 2021;11:23850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03311-x
  43. Garagavu SR, Clencius D, Rosa MM, et al. Visceral adiposity index: A potential marker of cardiometabolic risk. Arch Balk Med Union. 2018;53(2):246–251. https://doi.org/10.31688/ABMU.2018.53.2.11
  44. Garces MJ, Hemandez J, Queipo G, et al. Novel gender-specific visceral adiposity index for Mexican Pediatric population. Rev Medica Del Hosp Gen Mexico. 2014;77(4):153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hgmx.2014.10.002


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.