About the Author(s)


Abdul-Kabir Mohammed Email symbol
Department of Optometry, Faculty of Biosciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumas, Ghana

Department of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu- Natal, Durban, South Africa

Alvin J. Munsamy symbol
Department of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu- Natal, Durban, South Africa

Citation


Mohammed A-K, Munsamy AJ. Utilisation pattern of ophthalmic services in Ashanti Region, Ghana. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2024;16(1), a4326. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4326

Original Research

Utilisation pattern of ophthalmic services in Ashanti Region, Ghana

Abdul-Kabir Mohammed, Alvin J. Munsamy

Received: 21 Sept. 2023; Accepted: 05 Dec. 2023; Published: 20 Feb. 2024

Copyright: © 2024. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: Best practice in optometry and ophthalmology recommends regular visits to eye care professionals, as routine eye examinations support early detection of ocular defects and associated systemic, sometimes potentially life-threatening, conditions.

Aim: The study sought to determine the utilisation of ophthalmic services and its associated factors in the Ashanti region of Ghana.

Setting: Fifty electoral areas in 10 of the 43 districts in the Ashanti region of Ghana.

Methods: A total of 1615 participants, aged 18 years and above, were randomly selected in the Ashanti region of Ghana for this population-based, cross-sectional survey. The factors associated with having had an eye examination were guided by Andersen’s Behavioural Model. The data were analysed using multiple logistic regression, employing the IBM SPSS software, version 25.

Results: After statistical adjustments, compared with the 18–29-year-old age group, older participants were found to be more likely to utilise eye care services: In addition, participants with higher formal education had higher odds for eye care utilisation compared with no former education: Being hypertensive, self-reported vision problems and feeling that regular eye examinations are important, were statistically associated with eye care utilisation.

Conclusion: There is alarmingly poor utilisation of ophthalmic services in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Effective programmes to promote public health by addressing the socio-economic and individual barriers hindering the uptake of ophthalmic services in the Ashanti region of Ghana are thus necessary.

Contribution: The study addresses a gap in the knowledge of factors associated with ophthalmic services utilisation in the Ashanti region of Ghana.

Keywords: utilisation; ophthalmic services; visual impairment; blindness; eye care services.

Introduction

Eye care utilisation is among the essential factors considered in addressing the rising global prevalence of visual impairment and avoidable blindness.1 Visual impairment and blindness remain a major public health issue globally, especially in the low- and middle-income regions.2

Although the elimination of avoidable blindness and visual impairment, especially from infectious diseases, has seen some significant progress in developed countries, it is still a major public health issue in the developing and under-developed countries.2 The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness (IAPB), have, for more than a decade, been working towards the eradication of preventable blindness by the year 2020 through the VISION 2020: The Right to Sight initiative.3 Fatouhi et al.,4 revealed in their study that eye care service utilisation, is a crucial factor in realising the goals of ‘VISION 2020’. Therefore, understanding utilisation trends across Ghana could assist in designing strategies to improve eye care utilisation.

Best practice in optometry and ophthalmology recommends regular visits to eye care professionals, as routine eye examinations support the early detection of ocular defects and associated systemic, sometimes potentially life-threatening, conditions.5 Early interventions to restore, manage or treat such conditions also improve the prognosis. Furthermore, in cases of low vision where optimal sight cannot be restored, the quality of life of the patients can be improved through rehabilitation and other supportive interventions.6 It is essential that people access ophthalmic services regularly, because of the availability of interventions to prevent sight loss as a result of eye diseases or other causes of avoidable vision impairment.7 However, a study among older adults reported that the uptake of eye examinations in low, lower-middle, upper-middle and high-income countries was only 10%, 24%, 22% and 37%, respectively.8

Studies have been conducted on the low level of utilisation of ophthalmic services in both developed and developing countries to understand the factors responsible for the low utilisation of ophthalmic services.9,10,11 Studies have reported that individuals do not routinely access ophthalmic services in Ghana.7,12,13 However, these studies fell short of finding the reasons for the low utilisation of ophthalmic services, which is crucial in developing strategies to improve utilisation of the service.

A clear knowledge of ophthalmic service utilisation and its related factors will provide a framework, which stakeholders can use to develop strategies to improve eye care utilisation. This will reduce the prevalence of preventable blindness and visual impairment among people.

This study sought to determine the utilisation of ophthalmic services and the associated factors in the Ashanti region of Ghana, to help inform strategies to improve utilisation of the service.

Research methods and design

Study design

This study employed a population-based, cross-sectional descriptive design. To be included, participants had to fulfil the following requirements: residing in Ghana’s Ashanti region at the time of data collection and being at least 18 years old.

Setting

The sample was drawn from 10 out of the 43 districts in the Ashanti region of Ghana.

Study population and sampling strategy

The Fluid Survey Sample size calculator was used to determine a minimum sample size of 1537:

where N = population size, e = margin of error (percentage in decimal form), z = z-score and p = sample proportion.

For the population of 4 780 380 in the Ashanti region of Ghana, the minimum sample size was determined to be 1537 using a 95% confidence level and a 2.5% margin of error (the desired level of precision).

A multistage sampling technique was used for this study. By means of a proportionate to population probability technique, 50 electoral areas were chosen from 10 randomly selected districts out of the 43 in the Ashanti region. Of the 10 selected districts, six (Amansie south, Atwima Nwabiagya, Bosomtwe, Kumawu, Amansie West and Offinso North) were rural while four (Asokore Mampong, Asokwa, Ejisu and Old Tafo) were urban. Upon reaching a central point in an electoral area, a bottle was spun to determine a direction. Following that 15 households were selected per electoral area along the direction, making a total of 750 households. Within the households, 1804 individuals met the inclusion criteria, out of which 1615 (89%) agreed to take part in the survey.

Data collection

The biodata of the respondents (age, gender, education level, employment status and monthly income) as well as their eye care-seeking behaviour and utilisation were collected through a structured interviewer-guided questionnaire. Demographic information and the use of eye care services were determined with the use of items from the WHO multicountry World Health Survey questionnaire.14 Teaching and research assistants in the Optometry Department at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology in Kumasi, Ghana, administered all the questionnaires. The evaluation of eye care utilisation was performed by asking participants if they ever had an eye examination at an eye clinic. Andersen’s Behavioural Model15 was used to investigate factors associated with having had an eye examination. This model put the variables into predisposing, enabling and need categories.

Gender and age group served as study predisposing factors. The employment status, monthly income, residential location (rural or urban) and educational attainment were the enabling factors. The need factors were years since the last eye examination, having noticed a change in vision within the last 2 years and having systemic diseases (diabetes, hypertension, sickle cell anaemia). Systemic status (being afflicted by a systemic disease) was determined by self-reported history of diagnosis by a medical practitioner.

Data analysis

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Software, version 25 (SPSS 25) was used to analyse the data after it was entered into a Microsoft Excel worksheet (Microsoft Inc., USA). Analysis, both descriptive and inferential, was performed. Tables were used to display the results. Regression analysis and chi-square test were used for inferential analysis. A significance level of p ≤ 0.05 was applied to all tests.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the BREC of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Ref: BREC/00001787/2020) and the Committee on Human Research, Publications and Ethics of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana (Ref: CHRPE/AP/006/17). Gatekeeper consent was obtained from the Ashanti Regional Directorate of Health Services. Informed written consent was obtained from all the literate survey participants and the legally authorised representatives of illiterate participants. All study procedures adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

Sample characteristics

A total of 1615 of the 1804 individuals who were eligible participated in this study, representing a response rate of 89%. The mean age of the participants was 36.2 years, with an age range of 18–82 years. Of the participants, 54.4% were females and 52% lived in urban districts; 48.7% of the respondents were from the age group 18–29 years, followed by the 30–34-year-old group (26.7%). The majority of the respondents (87.7%) had some form of formal education and 25.6% had up to tertiary education. While 68.4% reported that they were in employment, 27.1% of the respondents earned less than 500 cedis (83 US dollars, the lowest wealth index) monthly, while only 0.4% earned more than 5000 cedis (826 US dollars, the highest wealth index). A diagnosis of one or more systemic diseases was reported by 12.3%: 3.9% were diabetic; 9.8% were hypertensive and 0.3% had sickle cell disease. Of the participants, 34.5% reported having observed a change in their vision within the last 2 years, while 85.3% of the participants reported that they felt regular eye examinations were necessary, even without symptoms, and 87.3% believed that children under five required eye examinations. All of the above-mentioned responses are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Description of the sample.
Eye care utilisation among the respondents

Table 2 shows the percentage of participants who had ever had an eye examination and whether they visit an eye clinic whenever they have an eye problem, across selected variables. The result in Table 2 was analysed by means of chi-square test. Overall, only 42.8% of the participants had ever had an eye examination and 17.3% always visit an eye facility whenever an eye problem arose.

TABLE 2: Eye care utilisation and related factors among the participants.
Predisposing factors

A higher percentage of males had had an eye examination, compared with females (45.2% vs. 40.8%). However, this was not statistically significant. Utilisation of eye care services increases with age, as 88.4% of participants in the age group ≥ 75 years had had an eye examination, compared with 36.2% in the 18–29-year age group. Table 2 also shows that age was significantly associated with visiting an eye care facility whenever an eye problem arose (p < 0.001).

Enabling factors

Bosomtwe and Asokore Mampong were the only 2 of the 10 districts where more than 50% of the participants (58.6% and 51.6%, respectively) had ever had an eye examination. Kumawu, which is one of the rural districts, registered the lowest (22.8%) eye care utilisation. While 59.9% of participants who were educated up to the tertiary level had sought eye care, all other education levels reported less than 50% utilisation of eye care services.

The study also found increased eye care utilisation as income rose. Whereas 83.3% of participants who earn ≥ 5000 cedis had had an eye examination, only 27.1% of those earning ≤ 500 cedis had had an eye examination. Although the employed appeared to have utilised eye care services less than the unemployed (41.9% vs. 44.6%), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.334). Among the enabling factors, constituency, level of education and monthly income were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with visiting an eye clinic whenever an eye problem arose.

Needs factors

Whereas 78.0% of hypertensives and 58.8% of diabetics had sought an eye examination, only 40% of participants with sickle cell anaemia had ever utilised eye care. Hypertension and diabetes were found to be significantly associated with accessing eye care (hypertension, p < 0.001; diabetes, p = 0.004). Of the participants who self-reported vision problem in the last 2 years, 60.7% had ever had an eye examination, compared with 44.4% of those who felt regular eye examinations were necessary. However, both groups were significantly associated with seeking eye care (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). With regard to need factors, diabetes (p = 0.004), hypertension (p < 0.001) and vision problems (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with accessing eye care whenever an eye problem arose.

Factors associated with reports of a previous eye examination

Table 3 shows the results of the multiple logistic regression models on whether the participants had ever had an eye examination and the associated factors.

TABLE 3: Multiple logistic regression: Having had a previous eye examination and related factors.
Model 1: Predisposing factors

People in the older age group showed an increased likelihood of having previously accessed eye care, compared with those between 18 and 29 years of age: 45–59 years, OR = 2.06, p < 0.001; 60–74 years, OR = 3.09, p < 001; ≥ 75 years, OR = 14.0, p < 001. Also, when compared with males, females had a reduced likelihood of previously seeking eye care (OR = 0.77; p = 0.014).

Model 2: Predisposing and enabling factors

In Model 2, which included predisposing and enabling factors, the associations with predisposing factors were similar to those in Model 1. Regarding the enabling factors, Model 2 showed that participants in Asokore Mampong, Bosomtwi and Ejisu had an increased likelihood of utilising eye care compared with those in Amansie South (Asokore Mampong, OR = 2.00, p = 0.006; Bosomtwi, OR = 3.44, p < 0.001; Ejisu, OR = 2.14, p = 0.006). Model 2 also showed that having higher education was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of having previously accessed eye care when compared with those who did not have any form of formal education (secondary, OR = 1.96, p = 0.002; tertiary, OR = 3.48, p < 0.001). Model 2 went on to show that increased wealth was associated with an increased likelihood of previously accessing eye care, when compared with the lowest wealth index (5001 – 1000, OR = 1.67, p = 0.002; 1001 – 2000, OR = 2.91, p < 0.001, 2001 – 5000, OR = 3.84, p < 0.001).

Model 3: Predisposing, enabling and need factors

The final model, Model 3, incorporated the predisposing, enabling and need factors. After statistical adjustment, the older age groups were found to be significantly associated with seeking eye care, compared with the 18–29-year-old age group: 30–44 years, OR = 1.73, p < 0.001; 45–59 years, OR = 2.12, p < 0.001; 60–74 years, OR = 3.17, p = 0.001; ≥ 75 years, OR = 12.24, p = 0.008. With regard to districts, Model 3 showed that only participants in Asokore Mampong had an increased likelihood of accessing eye care when compared with Amansie South (Asokore Mampong, OR = 2.51, p < 0.001). Model 3 also showed that education, when compared with no formal education, was significantly associated with eye care utilisation: primary, OR = 1.31, p < 0.001; intermediate, OR = 1.15, p < 0.001; secondary, OR = 2.25, p < 0.001; tertiary, OR = 3.51, p < 0.001. Model 3 further showed that being hypertensive (OR = 1.30, p < 0.001), having self-reported vision problems in the last 2 years (OR = 2.31, p < 0.001) and feeling that regular eye examinations are important (OR = 2.19, p = 0.007), were statistically associated with eye care utilisation.

Discussion

Coverage is a crucial component in the assessment of healthcare system performance. In this study, therefore, participants’ self-reported history of ever having visited an eye care facility for their eye care needs was used as a measure of eye care utilisation. This study revealed that 57.2% of the participants had never had their eyes examined, while only 25% had had their eyes examined at least once in the previous 2 years. The study found that age, district of residence, level of education, monthly income, presence of systemic disease (diabetes, hypertension), self-reported vision problems and feeling that regular eye examinations are important, were significantly associated with eye care utilisation. Gender was not statistically associated with eye care utilisation in this study. However, a higher proportion of males had utilised eye care, compared with females.

More than half (57.2%) of the participants had never utilised eye care services, which was in agreement with several other studies.7,16,17,18,19 Possible factors that could serve as barriers to ophthalmic services utilisation include availability, affordability and accessibility.

This study found age to be significantly associated with eye care utilisation. The increased likelihood of the aged seeking eye care, compared with the young, can be attributable to age-related ophthalmic conditions.4 The older one gets, the higher one’s risk of developing ophthalmic conditions and the more likely one is to seek eye care.3 This is consistent with studies in both developing18 and developed20 countries.

District of residence was also found to be associated with eye care utilisation. Residents in Asokore Mampong, Ejisu and Bosomtwi were significantly more likely to seek eye care than those in other districts. Regional differences in eye care utilisation have been reported by other studies.18,21 This may be attributed to differences in awareness about the need for regular eye examinations and the availability of ophthalmic services in the communities. Asokore Mampong and Ejisu are urban districts that have a number of public and private eye care facilities available to their people. Although Bosomtwi is a rural constituency, it has two well-equipped ophthalmic mission clinics operated under the auspices of the Christian Health Association of Ghana (CHAG), which serve patients across the region. This may be one of the reasons why a higher proportion of the participants in Bosomtwi, compared with the other districts, were associated with seeking eye care, despite it being a rural district.

Level of education was associated with eye care utilisation. Participants with a higher level of education were more likely to utilise eye care than the less educated. This may be attributed to greater knowledge and perhaps more concern about their eye health. Fotouhi et al.4 also reported an increased likelihood of utilising eye care with higher levels of education in an Iranian population and presumed educated people usually belong to the higher socioeconomic class, which facilitated greater access to eye care in terms of affordability. Other studies13,22,23 also reported a positive association between education and eye care use.

Monthly income was also found to be associated with increased likelihood of utilising eye care services. A plausible explanation could be the general socioeconomic status of higher-income earners. They may, therefore, find ophthalmic services more affordable and thus have greater access compared with low-income earners. This observation was reported in other low- and middle-income countries.11,24,25,26

Self-reported vision problems were also associated with an increased likelihood of utilising eye care services, as such problems may affect the activities of daily living. Vision can also be a determinant in the career aspirations of people, and thus its loss is linked to the loss of certain occupations, which may drive poverty and mental health conditions, among others. Ahmad et al.27 and Akuffo et al.25 reported a higher probability of persons with vision-related problems seeking eye care services. People with symptoms of blurred vision, or any other vision-related problem, will generally be more likely to seek eye care.

Participants who felt regular eye examinations were important were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of seeking eye care. People who are aware of the need for regular eye examinations will know more about the preventative aspects of vision loss than those who are unaware, thus, increasing their likelihood of using eye care services. Regular eye examinations can detect ophthalmic conditions in their earliest stage when they are most treatable to prevent vision loss, as many vision-threatening eye diseases including glaucoma, macular degeneration, cataracts or diabetic retinopathy have no or minimal symptoms until the disease has progressed.

A significant association was also found between the presence of a systemic disease, such as diabetes or hypertension and eye care utilisation. This could be a result of the recommendation generally given to diabetics and hypertensives to monitor their eyes at least once every 2 years28 because of the risk of developing retinopathies after some years of having these conditions. Other studies29,30 reported similar observations. They recommended health education and awareness campaigns on the benefits of seeking ophthalmic services timeously to prevent visual impairment.

To the authors’ knowledge, this is a pioneering study assessing ophthalmic service utilisation in the Ashanti region of Ghana, with the major advantage of using population-based evidence for eye care utilisation. This suggests that its findings could be generalised to the entire population of the Ashanti region of Ghana. However, our study has some limitations. The factor used to measure the utilisation of ophthalmic services was self-reported, which may have been affected by recall bias: recalling the period since the last eye examination. Data were generated from 10 of the 43 districts in the region because of logistical constraints. Nonetheless, the results from this study could assist in developing strategies to improve ophthalmic service utilisation in the Ashanti region and in Ghana as a whole.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study revealed an alarmingly low use of ophthalmic services in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Ophthalmic service utilisation was found to be associated with some predisposing, enabling and need factors, as explained by Anderson’s healthcare utilisation model. Regarding predisposing factors, ophthalmic service utilisation was associated with age but not with gender. Enabling factors such as district of residence, level of education and monthly income (wealth) were associated with an increased likelihood of seeking ophthalmic services. With regard to the need factors, we found that participants with diabetes, hypertension, vision problems and those who think regular eye examinations are important are associated with eye care utilisation.

There is a need for effective public health programmes to address the socio-economic and individual barriers hindering the uptake of ophthalmic services in the Ashanti region of Ghana. The importance of timeously seeking eye care services in preventing visual impairments and blindness needs to be emphasised. The awareness of available eye care services in the region, with an emphasis on the implications of delays in seeking eye care, should be promoted intensively. Stakeholders should start public eye health campaigns on the annual, dedicated World Sight Day to raise awareness about the need for regular eye examinations.

Acknowledgements

The assistance of teaching and research assistants of the Department of Optometry and Visual Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology in the 2020/2021 academic year is gratefully acknowledged. Our gratitude is also extended to the Ashanti Regional Director of Health Services and to all the participants in this study.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exist.

Authors’ contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the article as follows: A-K.M was responsible for the study conception and design. A-K.M was responsible for the data collection. A-K.M and A.J.M. was responsible for the analysis and interpretation. The draft of the article was prepared by A-K.M and A.J.M. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the article.

Funding information

There is no external funding associated with this article.

Data availability

The data supporting the conclusion of this study are available from the corresponding author A-K.M upon request.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the authors.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). World report on vision [homepage on the Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. World report on vision (who.int). Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241516570
  2. World Health Organization. Visual impairment and blindness [homepage on the Internet]. Fact Sheet No. 282. 2012 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment
  3. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.041210
  4. Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Mohammad K. Eye care utilization patterns in Tehran population: A population based cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2006;6(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-4
  5. Breslin CW. Our vision of vision health: The National Coalition for Vision Health. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42(6):790. https://doi.org/10.3129/i07-177
  6. Khan SA, Shamanna BR, Nuthethi R. Perceived barriers to the provision of low vision services among ophthalmologists in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2005;53(1):69. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.15293
  7. Ilechie AA, Otchere H, Darko-Takyi C, Halladay AC. Access to and utilization of eye care services in Ghana. Int J Health Res. 2013;6(3):7–14.
  8. Vela C, Samson E, Zunzunegui MV, Haddad S, Aubin M-J, Freeman EE. Eye care utilization by older adults in low, middle, and high income countries. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012;12(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-5
  9. Jin Y-P, Trope GE. Eye care utilization in Canada: Disparity in the publicly funded health care system. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46(2):133–138. https://doi.org/10.3129/i10-120
  10. Brian G, Maher L, Ramke J, Palagyi A. Eye care in Fiji: A population-based study of use and barriers. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(2):43–51. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2011.628135
  11. Ntsoane MD, Oduntan OA. A review of factors influencing the utilization of eye care services. Afr Vis Eye Health. 2010;69(4):182–192. https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v69i4.143
  12. Ocansey S, Kumi-Kyereme A, Awusabo-Asare K, Ilechie AA, Boadi-Kusi SB, Abraham CH. Utilization of eye care services among Ghanaian elderly population: Evidence from a peri-urban community. Ophthalmol Res. 2013;1(2):89–101. https://doi.org/10.9734/OR/2013/5543
  13. Abdul-Kabir M, Ehianata O, Kumah DB, et al. Pattern of ophthalmic services utilization in the Asawase Constituency of Ghana. IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci. 2016;5(4):35–38. https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-0504053538
  14. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Villanueva M, et al. WHO multi-country survey study on health and responsiveness. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  15. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137284
  16. Ebeigbe JA, Ovenseri-Ogbomo GO. Barriers to utilization of eye care services in rural communities in Edo State, Nigeria. Borno Med J. 2014;11(2):98–104.
  17. Ibeneche HO, Ekpenyong BN, Ebri A. Barriers to accessing eye care services in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria. J Niger Optom Assoc. 2018;20(1):64–69.
  18. Nirmalan PK, Katz J, Robin AL, et al. Utilisation of eye care services in rural south India: The Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(10):1237–1241. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2004.042606
  19. Peng Y, Tao QS, Liang YB, et al. Eye care use among rural adults in China: The handan eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2013;20(5):274–280. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2013.823216
  20. Orr P, Barrón Y, Schein OD, Rubin GS, West SK. Eye care utilization by older Americans: The SEE project. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(5):904–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00508-4
  21. Wang JJ, Mitchell P, Smith W. Use of eye care services by older Australians: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999;27(5):294–300. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00227.x
  22. Barraza J. The role of educational attainment in utilization of eye care services by Medicare recipients with diabetes mellitus. Medicare. 1998;15:253–254.
  23. Schaumberg DA, Christen WG, Glynn RJ, Buring JE. Demographic predictors of eye care utilization among women. Med Care. 2000;38(6):638–646. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200006000-00005
  24. Yawson AE, Ackuaku-Dogbe EM, Seneadza NAH, et al. Self-reported cataracts in older adults in Ghana: Sociodemographic and health related factors. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-949
  25. Akuffo KO, Sewpaul R, Dukhi N, et al. Eye care utilization pattern in South Africa: Results from SANHANES-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05621-8
  26. Mashige KP, Martin C. Utilization of eye care services by elderly persons in the northern Ethekwini district of Kwa-Zulu-Natal province, South Africa. Afr Vis Eye Health. 2011;70(4):175–181. https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v70i4.113
  27. Ahmad K, Zwi AB, Tarantola DJM, Azam SI. Eye care service use and its determinants in marginalized communities in Pakistan: The Karachi marine fishing communities eye and general health survey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015;22(6):370–379. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2015.1012592
  28. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl. 1):S11–S66. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-S011
  29. Olusanya BA, Ashaye AO, Owoaje ET, Baiyeroju AM, Ajayi BG. Determinants of utilization of eye care services in a rural adult population of a developing country. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016;23(1):96. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.164621
  30. Wagner LD, Rein DB. Attributes associated with eye care use in the United States: A meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(7):1497–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.030


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.