About the Author(s)


Patrick Minani symbol
Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Andrew Ross Email symbol
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Citation


Minani P, Ross A. Strengthening caesarean birth: Sub-Saharan Africa health system evaluation: Scoping review. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2024;16(1), a4128. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4128

Review Article

Strengthening caesarean birth: Sub-Saharan Africa health system evaluation: Scoping review

Patrick Minani, Andrew Ross

Received: 18 Apr. 2023; Accepted: 26 Feb. 2024; Published: 29 Apr. 2024

Copyright: © 2024. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: Promoting safe caesarean birth (CB) is a challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where maternal and neonatal mortality rates are high due to inadequate maternal health services. Although the CB rate in SSA is lower than the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation, it is often associated with high maternal and neonatal mortality.

Aim: The aim of this scoping review was to report on the extent to which SSA health systems deliver safe CB.

Methods: A systematic search across various databases identified 53 relevant studies, comprising 30 quantitative, 10 qualitative and 16 mixed methods studies.

Results: These studies focused on clinical protocols, training, availability, accreditation, staff credentialing, hospital supervision, support infrastructure, risk factors, surgical interventions and complications related to maternal mortality and stillbirth. CB rates in SSA varied significantly, ranging from less than 1% to a high rate of 29.7%. Both very low as well as high rates contributed to significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. Factors influencing maternal and perinatal mortality include poor referral systems, inadequate healthcare facilities, poor quality of CBs, inequalities in access to maternity care and affordable CB intervention.

Conclusion: The inadequate distribution of healthcare facilities, and limited access to emergency obstetric care impacted the quality of CBs. Early access to quality maternity services with skilled providers is recommended to improve CB safety.

Contributions: This scoping review contributes to the body of knowledge motivating for the prioritization of maternal service across SSA.

Keywords: health system; caesarean birth; Sub-Saharan Africa; public health; skilled birth attendants; anaesthetic safety.

Introduction

Caesarean birth (CB) is a vital surgical procedure needed to manage some complications related to pregnancy and childbirth.1 Caesarean birth is an operative practice in which an incision is made through a mother’s abdomen and uterus to extract one or multiple babies, or infrequently, extract a dead fetus.2 Because of the perceived safeness of the procedure and the convenience (for the mother and doctor) of being able to plan birth, CB has become a popular mode of giving birth.3 As a result, the rate of CB has been rising in many countries around the world despite the World Health Organization (WHO) recommending that the rate of CB should not exceed 10% – 15% of deliveries.3

According to the WHO, between 1990 and 2014, the mean rate of CB ranged from 6% to 12.4% in low-resourced countries and 27% in developed countries4 with this rate increasing by 4.4% annually.5 When compared to continents across the world, Africa has the lowest rate of CB at 7.3%, Asia 19.2%, Europe 25%, Oceania 31.1%, North America 32.3%, with Latin America and the Caribbean reporting the highest rates of CB at 40.5%.4,5 These numbers are far from the 10% – 15% CB rate as recommended by the WHO. What is more, CB carries a significant risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality when compared with vaginal birth.6,7

Multiple maternal and perinatal risk factors have been associated with CB leading to increased morbidity and mortality8 when compared to vaginal birth. This is especially true in settings where there is a shortage of skilled staff, where there are insufficient medical facilities and equipment and where CBs are performed in less-than-ideal conditions.1 During CB, the mother has an increased risk of developing an intraoperative injury; post CB, the mother might develop bleeding or infection that could require a hysterectomy or could lead to death, and in the long term, the mother has an increased risk of developing pelvic adhesions. In subsequent pregnancies, the mother is at a greater risk of abnormal placentation, stillbirth, preterm birth at any stage of the pregnancy and uterine rupture.9

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a CB is usually an emergency procedure that is done too often and has led to unnecessary negative outcomes on maternal and foetal health.10 In contrast, when a CB is done for the correct indications, this leads to reduced risk to the mother and newborn baby.1 The purpose of this scoping review was to look at the evidence that effective healthcare systems contribute to safe CB practices in SSA. The specific objectives were to determine the factors of health systems that influence CB outcomes, to assess and understand how health systems contribute to effective CB practice in SSA and to understand how these influence the indications for CB as well as the maternal outcome post CB.

Methods

Search strategy

A systematic search of primary studies in peer-reviewed journals was done on MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, JSTOR Health & General Sciences Collection, CINAHL with Full Text, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE with Full Text, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, African Index Medicus (AIM), Bioline International, BioMed and EBSCOhost. The search was carried out using the following keywords with Boolean terms: Cesarean birth OR Cesarean section OR C-section AND factors OR determinant OR indications AND maternal mortality, OR morbidity AND maternal referral AND health system AND SSA. Articles that could not be accessed through the electronic search were sought through the University library. Articles retrieved from the searches were screened by the author, and references were managed using Endnote version 9. The review included research articles from January 2005 to October 2020, and the search was conducted in December 2020. Articles were initially screened using titles followed by further screening using abstracts of selected articles for eligibility (Risma). Articles that did not meet the eligibility criteria at the title and abstract screening were excluded and only those that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were considered for full article review. Studies were selected based on the following criteria:

  • Only studies published in English were considered.
  • Only articles focusing on CB in SSA published between 2005 and 2020.
  • Studies that evaluated the frequency and accessibility of CB.
  • Studies that included the maternal and perinatal outcomes after undergoing CB.
  • Studies considered were cross-sectional, retrospective, descriptive, analytical and those that used mixed methodology.
  • Studies that considered health system factors (training, support, accreditation or licensing of operators, protocols, equipment, staffing) that influenced CB outcomes and complications associated with CB.
Primary outcomes

The outcomes of interest included the following: health system factors that influenced the practice of CB in both rural and urban areas of SSA. These included the use of clinical protocols, training of doctors, availability of anaesthetists and nurses accredited in maternity services, credentialing of qualified staff, the occurrence of review or supervision within the hospital and support or infrastructure.8,11 The other outcomes were to identify and describe the indications associated with the pregnancy, the surgical intervention, perioperative complications associated with maternal mortality and stillbirth. Other outcomes of interest included the country of study, risks associated with CBs such as stillbirths, bladder injury, etc.

Data extraction process

Data extraction from the included studies was carried out by the author under his supervisor’s guidance. Data extraction was done using content analysis. Articles were screened to identify the outcomes of interests and these were entered into a data extraction table. The data extraction form was generated from Microsoft Word and drawn up based on the study variables and types of data to be collected. The following study characteristics were extracted: publication characteristics (authorship list, date of publication, journal of publication and country or language of publication), study design information and outcomes assessed.

Narrative synthesis was used to synthesise the data, as most of the outcomes were qualitative in nature such as identifying risk factors, barriers and facilitators in health systems and facilities. Narrative synthesis enabled the researcher to describe and explain issues, which were discussed in the screened articles.

Study selection

The data were obtained after searching on PubMed and Google Scholar in English using the keywords. A flow diagram documenting the process of study selection is in Figure 1. A total of 625 titles were identified through the literature search, other sources and the removal of duplicates. Evaluation of these citations by the author excluded a total of 324 articles because of not meeting the inclusion criteria, leading to 301 articles for review in full text. Among these articles, a total of 245 were excluded by the reviewer (reasons provided in Figure 1), leaving a total of 56 publications for final inclusion. PRISMA provides an overview of the primary features of these.

FIGURE 1: PRISMA flow diagram of the analysis procedure.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (No. BREC/00002286/2021).

Results

Characteristics of included studies

Figure 2 indicates the distribution of the 56 studies with respect to study sites where the studies were conducted.

FIGURE 2: Distribution of surveyed studies according to first-author, country-institution affiliation (N = 56).

Thirty of the studies were quantitative; 10 were qualitative and 16 used mixed methods. In terms of outcomes, 5 reported on the use of clinical protocols; 7 on the training of doctors, anaesthetist and nurses; 6 on the availability of anaesthetists and 4 on nurses accredited in maternity services, credentialing of qualified staff; 4 on the occurrence of review or supervision within the hospital and 12 on support or infrastructure. In addition, 5 identified and described the risk factors associated with the pregnancy, 6 described surgical interventions and 7 described perioperative complications associated with maternal mortality and stillbirth. Further details can be seen in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Characteristics of included studies.
TABLE 2: Key health system issues identified.
Health system factors influencing caesarean birth outcome

The main risk factors that influenced maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity after CB included poor referral and counter-referral systems, inadequate healthcare facilities, poor quality of CBs or lack of skilled staff, inequalities of access to maternity care and emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and affordable CB intervention.1,3,9,11,15,18,55

An international, prospective, observational cohort study conducted in Africa on CB found that in many countries common complications that led to maternal deaths were intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, reported in 136 (3.8%) of 3612 mothers in the study; 14 (2%) of 626 patients had postoperative complications that were associated with in-hospital deaths.8,55 However, the major obstetrical risk factors related to CB were infectious complications, operative and postoperative bleeding and stillbirth,1,3,9,11 as well as complications associated with both general and high spinal anaesthetists (a composition of failed intubation, aspiration, cardiac arrest and hypoxia).8 A retrospective study of hospital records conducted in four hospitals between 2013 and 2016 in Goma, Northeast of the Democratic Republic of Congo, reported 4534 deliveries including 736 (16.2%) by CB. This study showed that fistulae were the most common outcomes because of prolonged labour. Another study conducted in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, in 2018 revealed that the delay in referring emergency obstetric cases contributed to 47.06% of maternal mortality.9 Recommendations from these studies highlighted that promoting access to CB practice and providing a quality surgical operation for all CD indications (elective or emergency cases) as well as limiting CB overuse could avert and/or reduce much of the maternal death associated with CB.

Accessibility and capability of sub-Saharan African countries to perform caesarean birth

In many SSA countries, the healthcare systems are characterised by insufficient healthcare facilities, finances and inadequate resources.5 Access to maternal health services remains a challenge in SSA, even though some countries have adopted a user-free maternal healthcare policy.42,55,56 A study conducted in Nigeria and Ghana revealed that inequality in access to CB intervention is still present despite the user-free maternal healthcare policy15 and that these inequalities exist among women of different sociodemographics.15 A similar study conducted in Ghana showed that the wealth status of pregnant women influenced the rise of the CD rate to 27.5% when compared to the percentage of poor women of whom only 5% had CB.15 However, living in a rural area and a low level of education increased the challenge of accessing a CB because of inadequate health infrastructures and a shortage of staff.15 Such studies highlight the fact that free access to maternal services cannot resolve the inequality regarding access to CB intervention. It is therefore important to improve the quality of the service, especially maternal healthcare services with access to skilled providers and skilled attendants, and sustain access to health services that reduce the maternal mortality associated with CB intervention.15

A study conducted in South Africa discussed characteristics of facility-based CB rates and safety in the public sector and emphasised the inequalities between the provinces. These included1: (1) the necessity of access to a safe CB intervention throughout the entire country and (2) the process to avert the rising rates of CB as this does not confer a benefit to maternal health.14 In addition, this study highlighted the need to improve the health system in the public sector, specifically the quality of the service delivery (skilled doctors, nurses and anaesthetists that can ensure a safe CB and manage complications related to CB) and create an environment for a safe CB in terms of equipment, infrastructure and quality care to be able to manage the complications related to CB. In ddition, the report highlighted that a strategy is needed to: (1) ensure patients are adequately evaluated before booking for CB, (2) ensure a reduction in primary CB, (3) ensure protocols that will guide the provision of vaginal births after CB and (4) encourage vaginal births in selected cases, the implementation of which may reduce the increasing rate of CB and complications related to CB.18

Caesarean birth prevalence

Studies conducted in Cameroon and Nigeria reported a facility-based CB rate of 29.4% and 29.6%, respectively, which is much higher than the 10% – 15% WHO recommended rate and indicates that there is overuse of CB in the studied populations6,18 and higher than the average CB rate (20%) in other developing countries.34 Furthermore, a high proportion of the cost of CB is related to real healthcare costs, which can bring a significant burden on the health system.44,54

Table 3 shows the CB frequency in SSA where the CB frequency varies from 0.26% to 29.7%.6,18 The highest facility-based CB rate in this scoping review was 29.7% at Gondar University Hospital, Ethiopia and the lowest was a rate of 0.28% in Burkina Faso.9,48 The high rate of 29.7% did not confer any benefit to reducing maternal and perinatal mortality and was significantly higher than the recommendation from the WHO, which recommends the CB rates of the country should not be greater than 10% – 15%.27 However, a rate of 0.28% is also of concern and contributes to significant maternal morbidity (in the form of fistulae) and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

TABLE 3: Caesarean birth rate (%).

In SSA, the low CB rate has contributed to the rise of foetomaternal mortality and morbidity.27 A facility-based study conducted in Nigeria in 2020 demonstrated a CB rate of 6.1%, which the authors concluded was because of the inequality of access to and use of maternal health intervention for the majority of women living in the rural area, which occurred despite the provision of free access to the maternal healthcare in the study setting.27 Factors that contributed to the low CB rate were inadequate health facilities, poor referral, counter-referral systems and substandard equipment resulting in adverse outcomes despite the adoption of a user-free maternal health services policy in Nigeria.27 Challenges of managing emergencies and referral cases for CB are dominant issues in several studies and highlight the health systems challenges in CB management.1,3,28

An analysis of maternal deaths in the context of CS in South Africa discovered that the risk of a woman dying after CS was nearly three times that of maternal mortality following vaginal delivery (VD).5 The study reported that haemorrhage was the primary cause of death (5.5 deaths per 10 000 CS administered); embolism was 4.5 times more frequent after CB than VD and hypovolemic shock was 4.8 times more likely and that the number of deaths per 10 000 CB cases ranged from 10.1 to 31.9.5 When the CC rate in a facility was compared to the case fatality rate, a negative link was discovered, indicating that in places with a lower CB rate, the case fatality rate was higher.

According to the 2015/16 District Health Barometer, the CB rates in South Africa’s public sector facilities climbed from 15.1% in 2006 to 24.1% in 2015. According to Solanki et al.,14 Gauteng and the North-Western Cape had the biggest increases. The availability of regional, provincial tertiary and national central hospitals and the unequal access to CB intervention may be the reasons for the notable variation in CB rates among provinces. Additionally, the high concentration of community health centres (CHCs) in predominantly rural provinces may have contributed to their lower proportion.

Even though CB is an effective procedure to avert maternal and perinatal mortality when used appropriately, it is not without risk that includes both immediate and long-term complications.50 In SSA countries, when emergency CBs are performed, there is often a high risk of complications for both the mother and the newborn. Early access to maternity services, rapid diagnosis, deciding to refer a patient after failure to induce labour with misoprostol and the early decision to refer the pregnant woman to another hospital that can safely perform a CB have been shown to decrease those risks.30 However, it is important to assess the pregnancy in terms of detecting potential factors (by attending antenatal care [ANC] and early ultrasound) that can help to avert complications related to CB. In this study, some causes of those risks were analysed including the poor maternal and newborn outcome, which was the result of lack of quality antenatal care and prenatal care, insufficient numbers of skilled health staff in the maternity unit, inadequate placement of healthcare facilities and difficulties to access to referral facilities.10,31,58 This study highlighted the need to prepare strategies that will empower the health systems to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality because of CB practice in SSA. This is particularly important for rural and overloaded DHs where there is a significant shortage of qualified staff and resources to provide a safe CB.

Reforms in the health systems and specific coaching of the staff in the maternity services (medical officers, gynaecologists, anaesthetists and midwives) are essential to decrease these complications and uncertain outcomes for pregnant women and babies after undergoing CB. However, to achieve this, health systems should provide good-quality or comprehensive EmOC that should always be available and accessible, that every woman should give birth within a maternity unit staffed by a professional, skilled attendant and that these services should be included in health systems, as well as the provision of safe obstetric anaesthesia.8 Poor outcomes from CB in SSA are often caused by factors related to the health systems, including inadequate training of mid-level providers, such as clinical officers and assistant medical officers, poor use of national treatment protocols, staff who are not authorised to perform CB, poor patient records and a lack of regular review of the indications for CBs that were performed.1 The common health system factors that led to poor outcomes were the inadequate provision of resources that can save women in an obstetric emergency, absence or poorly skilled birth attendants, inappropriate distribution of health facilities and poor referral and counter-referral systems that limit access to EmOC.38,59 This lack of access to safe CBs could be the predominant reason why some SSA counties reported a facility-based CB rate of less than 5% rather than the 10% – 15% recommended by the WHO in public and private healthcare facilities.39

Health system factors that influenced the CB outcomes negatively were mainly identified in rural areas. However, some countries have shown the political will to improve their health system, for example, in Maputo, Mozambique training of health providers on the referral of a patient to another health facility or district hospital, and training of supervisors on supportive supervision was provided.12 Another study conducted in Douala, Cameroon, identified the accreditation of skilled obstetricians and the availability of a single anaesthetist for all surgical emergencies.6 Furthermore, a study conducted in Lagos, Nigeria, reported that 57% of pregnant women were attended by a skilled health professional.6 These factors show the potential for improvement of the health systems and the impact that this could have on improving CB outcomes within and among SSA countries.

Indications for caesarean births

Table 4 shows the indications for CB in SSA. The main indications for CB reported by these authors were dystocia (difficult and protracted labour), scarred uterus, foetal distress, rupture or preuterine rupture, placenta previa, malpresentation, cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD), non-reassurance foetal heart and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder, breech presentation and cord prolapse.3,6,11,17,18,22,23,48

TABLE 4: Indication for caesarean birth.
Risks associated with caesarean birth practice

Table 5 shows the maternal and perinatal risk factors that lead to complications when performing CB. The main risk factors reported by these authors were chronic hypertension, cardiac disease, lung disease or other medical risk factors.1,8 Furthermore, a study conducted in Burkina Faso reported postpartum and antepartum haemorrhage, stillbirth and infection.9 The ratio of maternal mortality by direct obstetric cause was 147.38 maternal mortality per 100 000 live births with a mean of 6.8 maternal deaths annually.8,11,21 In addition, some incidents related to the procedure were also reported including bladder injury, intraoperative haemorrhages and the release of sutures.1

TABLE 5: The maternal risks associated with caesarean birth.

Discussion

This scoping review examined the role of healthcare systems in SSA, focusing on health system factors influencing CBs and maternal outcomes. Maternal care in SSA faces challenges because of factors such as inadequate facilities, lack of skilled staff and inequalities in access. Affordable interventions can help reduce CB complications, including intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, which contribute to maternal deaths. Promoting access to maternity care and limiting CB overuse could help reduce maternal mortality. Insufficient healthcare facilities in SSA countries, including Nigeria and Ghana, influencing maternal morbidity and mortality persist despite user-free maternal healthcare policies. Rural areas face greater challenges because of inadequate health infrastructures and staff shortages. Improving service quality, particularly with skilled providers, is crucial to reduce maternal mortality associated with CBs. To improve CB outcomes, the public health sector should enhance service delivery, including the provision of skilled doctors, nurses and anaesthetists, to ensure a safe and efficient CB management environment. Inadequate resources, lack of skilled birth attendants, inappropriate facility distribution and referral systems all contribute to poor health outcomes. To improve CB outcomes, health systems should ensure accessible, high-quality emergency care, professional maternity units and safe anaesthesia for every woman. Early access to maternity services, rapid diagnosis and referral to safe hospitals can decrease complications. Enhancing health systems, such as accreditation of skilled obstetricians and single anaesthetists, can also help.

Caesarean birth prevalence

The study populations in Cameroon and Nigeria reported a facility-based CB rate higher than the recommended rate of 10% – 15%, indicating overuse and a high proportion of CB costs related to real healthcare costs.5,6 The facility-based CB rate in Ethiopia, with a rate of 29.7%, is significantly higher than WHO’s recommendation of 10% – 15%, contributing to significant maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality and is also of concern.7,8 A study in South Africa found that maternal mortality after CB is nearly three times higher than after VD. Haemorrhage resulting in hypovolemic shock was the primary cause of maternal deaths.9 According to the 2015/16 District Health Barometer, CB rates in South Africa’s public sector facilities increased from 15.1% in 2006 to 24.1% in 2015, with the biggest increases in Gauteng and the North-Western Cape.10

Health system factors influencing caesarean birth outcome

Emergency maternal healthcare is influenced by various factors, including inadequate healthcare facilities, lack of skilled staff, inequalities in access to maternity care and affordable intervention.3,4,6,8,11,12,13 Complications in maternal surgery, including intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, are common in many African countries, leading to maternal deaths.12,14 Complications in childbirth, including CB, are primarily linked to risk factors such as infectious diseases, stillbirth and spinal anaesthetist, which can lead to cardiac arrest and hypoxia.3,8,11,13,14 A study in Goma, Congo, found that prolonged labour led to vesicovaginal fistulae, and delayed EmOC contributed to 47.06% of maternal mortality.8 This study highlights that using guidelines to ensure appropriate indications, promoting access and providing quality surgical operations could reduce maternal death associated with CB.

Contribution of health systems to effective caesarean birth practice in sub-Saharan Africa

Many SSA countries have inadequate healthcare systems because of insufficient facilities, finances and resources.15 Despite some countries adopting user-free maternal healthcare policies, access to maternal health services remains a significant challenge in SSA.12,16,17 A study in Nigeria and Ghana found that despite user-free maternal healthcare policies, inequality in access to CB intervention persisted among women of varying sociodemographic backgrounds.4 A Ghanian study revealed that the wealth status of pregnant women significantly influenced the increase in the CD rate to 27.5%, compared to a rate of only 5% among poor women.4

In rural areas, access to maternal services is challenging because of inadequate health infrastructures and staff shortages. Improving service quality, particularly with skilled providers, is crucial to reduce maternal mortality associated with CB intervention.4 The morbidity and mortality associated with CB in SSA highlights the need for increased safety measures and strategies to address the inequalities to ensure a comprehensive and effective CB service.10 There is also a need for strategies for early patient evaluation to reduce primary CB and encourage vaginal births, which would reduce the rate of CB and associated complications.6

The low CB rate in Nigeria, despite free access, has contributed to a rise in foetomaternal mortality and morbidity. This highlights the need to address factors such as inadequate health facilities, poor referral, counter-referral systems and substandard equipment, which contribute to the low CB rate, in addition to the adoption of user-free maternal health services.18 The management of emergencies and referral cases for CB is a major challenge in much of SSA, highlighting the health systems’ challenges in CB management.1,11,19

Influence of health systems on the indications for caesarean birth as well as the maternal outcome post caesarean birth

This review identified an urgent need for strategies to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality because of CB practices in SSA, especially in rural areas with inadequate health systems plagued by a shortage of qualified staff and inadequate resources. Poor health outcomes in obstetric emergencies can be attributed to inadequate resources, lack of skilled birth attendants, inappropriate facility distribution and inadequate referral systems.20,21 Poor maternal outcomes following CB in SSA are results of inadequate training, poor use of national treatment protocols, unauthorised staff, poor patient records and lack of regular review of indications.13 Health systems should ensure accessible, high-quality EmOC, professional, skilled attendant maternity units and safe obstetric anaesthesia for every woman.14

The lack of access to safe CBs in some SSA counties contributes to a facility-based CB rate below the WHO’s recommended rate of 10% – 15%.22 Caesarean birth, when used appropriately, effectively prevents maternal and perinatal mortality, but it also poses risks from immediate and long-term complications.23 Early access to maternity services, rapid diagnosis and referral to safe hospitals can decrease complications.24 Many CB complications can be prevented by detecting potential risk factors during antenatal care and addressing issues such as quality care, availability of skilled health staff and adequate healthcare facilities.25,26,27

Caesarean birth outcomes could be improved by enhancing health systems, such as accreditation of skilled obstetricians and availability of single anaesthetists for surgical emergencies, as reported in studies in Cameroon and Nigeria.5 Some countries have shown the political will to improve maternal services, such as Mozambique’s training of health providers and supervisors on the importance of timely referrals and supportive supervision.28

Strengths and weaknesses

The strength of this study is that it provides data from different types of studies evaluating health systems in SSA countries and their impact on the practice of CB. For example, a study conducted in a rural area in Nigeria reported that pregnant women travelled more than 20 km to attend a healthcare facility,15 while in Maputo, Mozambique, many training sessions were conducted with community health workers to ensure that they were clear about diseases or health concerns that need competent management, which included the referral of pregnant women for antenatal care and birth at healthcare facilities by a qualified personnel.60

Other studies conducted in an urban area of Lagos, Nigeria and Douala, Cameroon, found that only 57% of pregnant women were seen by qualified health staff with EmOC available and skilled birth attendants present at birth.6,13,49 Several health system points of quality and safety in low- to middle-resourced countries41 have been recognised, which include issues such as the absence of anaesthetic support, gaps in data quality (i.e. the name of an obstetrician who performed the CB and outcome of the procedure), insufficient equipment (this is associated with a delay to perform the procedure, anaesthetics complications and postoperative infections), gaps in training and supervision, lack of standardised protocols and skilled obstetricians as health system factors that influence the quality and safety of CB in many SSA countries.42 A study conducted in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, identified the availability of postoperative protocols (standing up early, removal of a urinary catheter and light meal on day 1) in the postoperative ward as contributing to better postoperative outcome, and additional training was provided to nurses for good implementation.17

The majority of SSA countries have a health workforce shortage, especially anaesthetists, and credentialing of the anaesthetist in the maternity unity was identified as an important health system activity to improve CB outcomes.1,6,15,17, Studies conducted in Ouagadougou, Cameroon, identified that when doctors were trained in general and spinal anaesthesia to perform CD, CB outcomes improved.9,17,40

Weaknesses of this scoping review

The weaknesses of this scoping review include the following:

  • Language limitation – the study was limited to articles in English and therefore might have missed papers in other languages.
  • Although the scope of the study was SSA, most papers were about specific countries that meant there were more papers from Nigeria, Ghana and Ethiopia and less from countries such as Zimbabwe, Zambia and Botswana.
  • It is probable that using ‘AND’ on ‘maternal referral’ in the records search strategy constrained the study to those papers that explicitly covered maternal referrals. This may have resulted in the study focusing solely on maternal referrals in relation to CB, at the expense of other important studies about CB that did not directly cover maternal referrals.
  • Only the main author was responsible for the data extraction. Although he worked under the guidance of his supervisor, this is a limiting factor.

Conclusion

This scoping review has discussed health system factors that contribute to CB practices that have a significant impact on maternal and newborn outcomes. The data showed evidence of weakness in health systems in the majority of SSA countries, which impact on the implementation of CB practice. Effective reforms of the health systems are needed to ensure accessibility to maternal health services, quality EmOC, availability of skilled birth attendants at every delivery, and availability of staff and equipment to ensure safe CB when necessary. The training of staff and the use of protocols in the management of complications would also contribute to reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. The rate of CB and the outcome of CB give a picture of the health system’s performance. It is difficult, however, to confirm whether the high proportion of CD in some SSA countries is associated with health system factors or inequity in access to the procedure. However, a good health system should provide a safe CB, be available and be accessible. The implementation of CB interventions needs to be performed in a secure environment with justifiable indications and with skilled staff (obstetrician, anaesthesist and nurse).

Acknowledgements

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions

P.M. was responsible for conceptualisation, reviewing of the database, identifying suitable articles, reviewing articles and writing the initial article. A.R. was responsible for conceptualisation, reviewing and editing of the article.

Funding information

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

Original data are available upon reasonable request from P.M.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the authors.

References

  1. Michel D, Mitangala P, Coppieters Y. Analysis of caesarean section practices and consequences in Goma, DR Congo: Frequency, indications, maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Arch Community Med Public Health. 2019;5(2):091–098. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5479.000060
  2. Asuquo E, Orazulike N, Onyekwere E, Odjegba J, Ojo A, Ogbansiegbe J. Factors associated with preference for caesarean section among women in the ante-natal clinic of a tertiary hospital in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. A pilot study. Br J Med Med Res. 2016;18(12):1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2016/28713
  3. Kabongo A, Bukasa J, Banza D, et al. Caesarean in rural environment of Eastern Kasai (RD Congo): Cover of the needs and quality of the services with Kasansa and Tshilenge. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6(5):1157–1163.
  4. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
  5. Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Cesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016;2(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-016-0033-x
  6. Henri E, Valere MK, Paul EJ, et al. Caesarean section in African setting: Current situation, problematic and qualitative approaches at Laquintinie Hospital (Douala, Cameroon). Open J Obstetr Gynecol. 2019;9(10):1392–1406. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2019.910135
  7. Victora CG, Barros FC. Cohort profile: The 1982 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(2):237–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi290
  8. Dare AJ. Making caesarean section safer for African mothers. Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(4):e402–e403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30054-3
  9. Sawadogo YA, Zamane H, Kiemtore S, et al. Maternal mortality by direct obstetric causes in an urban referral hospital: Case of Boulmiougou District Hospital in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. J Gynecol Women Healthcare. 2019;8(8):3009–3014. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193511
  10. Kinenkinda X, Mukuku O, Chenge F, et al. Cesarean section in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo I: Frequency, indications and maternal and perinatal mortality. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;27:72. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.27.72.12147
  11. Atombosoba EA, Patrick UE, West O. Determinants and factors influencing the prevalence of uterine rupture in a tertiary rural hospital in the Niger Delta: A 5 years retrospective study in NDUTH, Okolobiri. Pharma Innov. 2015;4(2, Part C):97.
  12. Give C, Ndima S, Steege R, et al. Strengthening referral systems in community health programs: A qualitative study in two rural districts of Maputo Province, Mozambique. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4076-3
  13. Olusanya BO, Solanke OA. Maternal and neonatal factors associated with mode of delivery under a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-41
  14. Solanki G, Daviaud E, Fawcus S, Cornell J. Caesarean section rates in South Africa: A case study of the health systems challenges for the proposed National Health Insurance. S Afr Med J. 2020;110(8):747–750. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i8.14699
  15. Ajayi AI. Inequalities in access to birth by caesarean section in the context of user fee exemption for maternal health services in southwest and north central Nigeria. Int Health. 2021;13(6):598–605. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihz118
  16. Taye MG, Nega F, Belay MH, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in a comprehensive specialized hospital of Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study; 2020. Ann Med Surg. 2021;67:102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102520
  17. Richard F, Ouedraogo C, De Brouwere V. Quality cesarean delivery in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: A comprehensive approach. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2008;103(3):283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.08.008
  18. Igwebueze OI. Clinical audit of quality of intrapartum care in a State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Southeast, Nigeria. J Women’s Health Care. 2015;4:249. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000249
  19. Seidu A-A, Hagan JE, Agbemavi W, et al. Not just numbers: Beyond counting caesarean deliveries to understanding their determinants in Ghana using a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2792-7
  20. Udoye P, West O. Determinants and factors influencing the prevalence of uterine rupture in a tertiary rural hospital in the Niger Delta: A 5 years retrospective study in NDUTH, Okolobiri. Pharma Innov. 2016;4(2, Part C):97–101.
  21. Egbe TO, Halle-Ekane GE, Tchente CN, Nyemb JE, Belley-Priso E. Management of uterine rupture: A case report and review of the literature. BMC Research Notes. 2016;9(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2295-9
  22. Echoka E, Makokha A, Dubourg D, Kombe Y, Nyandieka L, Byskov J. Barriers to emergency obstetric care services: Accounts of survivors of life threatening obstetric complications in Malindi District, Kenya. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17(Suppl 1):4. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamjs.supp.2014.17.1.3042
  23. Chiabi A, Takou V, Mah E, et al. Risk factors for neonatal mortality at the Yaounde gynaeco-obstetric and pediatric hospital, Cameroon. Iranian J Pediatr. 2014;24(4):393.
  24. Dankwah E, Kirychuk S, Zeng W, Feng C, Farag M. Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of caesarean section delivery in Ghana: A cross-sectional study using nationally representative data. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1063-6
  25. Ndungo K, Matumo P, Mulisya O, Juakali S. Epidemiologi-cal and therapeutic aspects of obstetric Fistula in the Peri Urban area of Butembo in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Clin Gynecol Obstet Reprod Sci. 2019;1:104.
  26. Enabudoso E, Isara AR. Determinants of patient satisfaction after cesarean delivery at a university teaching hospital in Nigeria. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2011;114(3):251–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.010
  27. Ali A, Okud A, Khojali A, Adam I. High incidence of obstetric complications in Kassala Hospital, Eastern Sudan. J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2012;32(2):148–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2011.637140
  28. Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Obed SA, Seffah JD. Maternal outcomes of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2014;127(3):238–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.06.010
  29. Massyn N. National, provincial and districts profiles. District Health Barometer. 2017/2018. Durban: Health System Trust; 2017.
  30. Belay T, Yusuf L, Negash S. A comparative study on first stage versus second stage caesarean section on maternal and perinatal outcome. Ethiopian Med J. 2014;52(1):1–8.
  31. Foumane P, Koh VM, Minkande JZ, Ngantcha EN, Dohbit J, Mboudou E. Facteurs de risque et pronostic des césariennes d’urgence à l’hôpital gynéco-obstétrique et pédiatrique de Yaoundé (Cameroun). Médecine et Santé Tropicales. 2014;24(1):89–93. https://doi.org/10.1684/mst.2014.0307
  32. Fetene MB, Bayable SD, Wendimu ES, et al. Perioperative patient satisfaction and its predictors following surgery and anesthesia services in North Shewa, Ethiopia. A multicenter prospective cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg. 2022;76:103478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103478
  33. Kampo S. Evaluation of patient satisfaction of anaesthetic assessment in a district hospital in Ghana. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Manage. 2019;2:1–12.
  34. Omondi L. Anxiety experience and preoperative nursing care evaluation among postoperative emergency caesarian section patients in two selected hospitals, Nairobi, Kenya. J Middle East N Afr Sc. 2017;10(4186):1–7. https://doi.org/10.12816/0038320
  35. Monticelli F. Caesarean section deliveries in public sector hospitals in South Africa, 2001–2009. Master’s research report. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand; 2012.
  36. Benwu KM, Gebremedhin HG. A prospective study on elective surgical inpatient satisfaction with perioperative anaesthesia service at Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0696-8
  37. Maine D. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: A handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
  38. Gabrysch S, Cousens S, Cox J, Campbell OM. The influence of distance and level of care on delivery place in rural Zambia: A study of linked national data in a geographic information system. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000394
  39. Yaya S, Zegeye B, Idriss-Wheeler D, Shibre G. Inequalities in caesarean section in Burundi: Evidence from the Burundi demographic and health surveys (2010–2016). BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05516-8
  40. Sharma G, Mathai M, Dickson KE, et al. Quality care during labour and birth: A multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S2
  41. Vora KS, Cottagiri SA, Saiyed S, Tailor P. Public health aspects of Cesarean section including overuse and underuse of the procedure. Int Res J Public Health. 2019;3:30.
  42. Plus FC. Maternal Health Task Force. Cesarean Section safety an d quality in low-resource settings: Report of a technical consultation. New York, NY: EngenderHealth/Fistula CarePlus; 2017, p. 27–28.
  43. Gyaase D, Enuameh YA, Adjei BN, et al. Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section deliveries in the Kintampo Districts of Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05622-5
  44. Manyeh AK, Amu A, Akpakli DE, Williams J, Gyapong M. Socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with caesarean section delivery in Southern Ghana: Evidence from INDEPTH Network member site. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2039-z
  45. Belay HM, Kassa RT, Negeri HA, Woldesenbet EB, Belachew FK. Maternal and fetal health outcomes of cesarean sections (CS) in Ethiopia: Results from retrospective cross-sectional study of Southern Ethiopia Gurage Zone Governmental Hospitals. IJS Global Health. 2022;5(4):e75. https://doi.org/10.1097/GH9.0000000000000075
  46. Long Q, Kempas T, Madede T, Klemetti R, Hemminki E. Caesarean section rates in Mozambique. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0686-x
  47. Ugwu NU, De Kok B. Socio-cultural factors, gender roles and religious ideologies contributing to caesarian-section refusal in Nigeria. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0050-7
  48. Solomon A. Prevalence of ceserean section and associated factors in university of Gondar Comprehensive Referal Hospital, North West Ethiopia. Gondar: University of Gondar; 2019.
  49. Ganle JK, Parker M, Fitzpatrick R, Otupiri E. Inequities in accessibility to and utilisation of maternal health services in Ghana after user-fee exemption: A descriptive study. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0089-z
  50. Ochieng Arunda M, Agardh A, Asamoah BO. Cesarean delivery and associated socioeconomic factors and neonatal survival outcome in Kenya and Tanzania: Analysis of national survey data. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1748403. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1748403
  51. Juma S, Nyambati V, Karama M, Githuku J, Gura Z. Factors associated with caesarean sections among mothers delivering at Mama Lucy Kibaki Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya between January and March, 2015: A case-control study. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;28(1):7. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.supp.2017.28.1.9290
  52. Ravit M, Audibert M, Ridde V, De Loenzien M, Schantz C, Dumont A. Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali? Int J Equity Health. 2018;17:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x
  53. Bishop D, Gibbs M, Dyer R. Post-caesarean delivery analgesia in resource-limited settings: A narrative review. Int J Obstetr Anesth. 2019;40:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.009
  54. Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, Darj E, Essén B. Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: A panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):107. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-107
  55. Bishop D, Dyer RA, Maswime S, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after caesarean delivery in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: A 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(4):e513–e522.
  56. Ajayi A, Akpan W. Who benefits from free institutional delivery? Evidence from a cross sectional survey of North Central and Southwestern Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:620. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2560-1
  57. Bayou YT, Mashalla YJ, Thupayagale-Tshweneagae G. Patterns of caesarean-section delivery in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2016;8(2):1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v8i2.953
  58. Kizonde K, Kinekinda X, Kimbala J. La cesarienne en milieu Africain: exemple de la maternité centrale Sendwe de Lubumbashi-RD Congo. Médecine d’Afrique Noire. 2006;53:293–298.
  59. Bailey P, Paxton A, Lobis S. The availability of life-saving obstetric services in developing countries: An in-depth look at the signal functions for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2006;93(3):285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.01.028
  60. Ndima S, Steege R, Ormel H. Strengthening referral systems in community health programs: A qualitative study in two rural districts of Maputo Province, Mozambique. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4076-3


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.