Original Research
Acceptance of screening for Intimate Partner Violence, actual screening and satisfaction with care amongst female clients visiting a health facility in Kano, Nigeria
Submitted: 22 February 2010 | Published: 24 June 2011
About the author(s)
Ime A. John, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, SwedenStephen Lawoko, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Sweden
Abimbola Oluwatosin, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to assess women’s acceptance of screening for IPV in healthcare, the extent to which inquiry about IPV was carried out in healthcare and whether such inquiry impacted on satisfaction with care.
Method: Data on these variables were gathered through structured interviews from a sample of 507 women at a regional hospital in Kano, Nigeria. The study design was cross-sectional.
Results: The results found acceptance for screening in the sample to be high (76%), but few women (7%) had actually been probed about violence in their contact with care providers. Acceptance for screening was associated with being married and being employed. Actual screening was associated with ethnicity and religion, where ethnic and religious majorities were more likely to be screened. Finally, being screened for IPV seemed to improve satisfaction with care.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the need for adaptation of a screening protocol that is also sensitive to detect IPV amongst all ethnic and religious groups. The findings also have implications for further education of socio-economically disadvantaged women on the benefits of screening.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 13791Total article views: 52992
Crossref Citations
1. Piloting the Domestic Violence Healthcare Providers’ Survey for Use in Uganda: Testing Factorial Structure and Reliability
Stephen Lawoko, Milton Mutto, David Guwattude
Psychology vol: 03 issue: 11 first page: 947 year: 2012
doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.311142