Social support and coping in adults with type 2 diabetes

Samantha Ramkisson, Basil J. Pillay, Wilbert Sibanda

Received: 22 Dec. 2016; Accepted: 09 Apr. 2017; Published: 31 July 2017

Copyright: © 2017. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of diabetes has been described as a lifelong psychological burden on the patient and his or her family. Social support plays a pivotal role in patients with diabetes and is important in enabling them to cope effectively with the disease. There is a dearth of research on social support and coping in patients with diabetes in South Africa.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore whether patients with poor perceived social support have lower levels of well-being and coping than patients with good social support.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted at both public and private facilities on the north coast of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The Diabetes Care Profile (DCP), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), the Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ) and the WHO-5 Well-being Index (WHO-5) were administered to 401 participants.

Results: The findings indicate that there is an inverse relationship between social support and coping, which suggests that an increase in social support is associated with a decrease in emotional distress. There was a small positive correlation between the SSQ and the WHO-5, which suggests participants who had good support endorsed better levels of well-being. Although participants indicated that they were satisfied with their level of support, they had poor coping as indicated by the high mean score on the GHQ and the high HbA1c level. There was a small positive correlation between GHQ and HbA1c. There was no association between social support and HbA1c.

Conclusion: Social support is important in helping the patient with diabetes cope with the disease and to improve adherence to treatment. Health care providers should take cognisance of psychosocial factors in the treatment regime of the patient. Family members should be educated about diabetes, the importance of adherence and long-term complications of the disease.

Background

The diagnosis of diabetes has been described as a lifelong psychological burden on the person and his or her family.¹ Diabetes is a chronic, demanding disease, which requires daily management and strict adherence to medication, diet and exercise. Failure to adhere to these regimens can lead to uncontrolled blood sugar levels and complications such as blindness, kidney failure, leg amputation and nerve damage.² Literature shows that social support plays a pivotal role in patients with diabetes and can contribute to the successful management of the disease.^3,4,5,6,7 Social support helps with diabetes control and provides support for the necessary physical and dietary changes.⁸ Family support has been identified as the main source of support⁹ and plays an essential role in lifestyle changes and diabetes management.⁶ Because of the chronic nature of diabetes, patients make regular visits to health care providers and this can result in these health care providers also becoming part of their social support network.^8,9

According to Grey,¹⁰ coping serves as a protective function that can eliminate or modify stressful conditions. The chronic disease burden of diabetes is considered to be a stressor with which the patient with diabetes is expected to cope with on a daily basis.^10,11 Psychological and physical health depend on the ability of the patient to thoughtfully plan and adhere to routines of diet, activity and medication regardless of competing life demands, life stressors or temporary moods.¹² Some patients are successful in integrating these demands of the disease into their daily lives; however, some patients have difficulty with accepting the disease, which leads to the inability to cope with it.^12,13 This may lead to a decrease in the patient’s self-care, adherence to medication and have an adverse impact on metabolic control.¹³

In South Africa, 2.3 million people are estimated to be living with diabetes, with 1.39 million people who have not yet been diagnosed.¹⁴ In 2014, diabetes was among the top three leading causes of death in South Africa and the second leading cause of death in women.¹⁵

Despite the abundance of international research on social support and coping in patients with diabetes, there is a dearth of such research in South Africa. The aim of this study was to explore whether patients with poor perceived social support have lower levels of well-being and coping than patients with good social support locally.

Method

Participants were recruited from two public health facilities and five private medical practices on the north coast of KwaZulu-Natal. The method used in this explorative study is similar to that used in other studies.^16,17

Participants

Patients who were 18 years and older had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for more than six months and who were able to speak English or isiZulu fluently were invited to participate in the study. The total sample consisted of 401 participants, 200 from the private health sector and 201 from the public health sector.

Procedure

Trained research assistants who were fluent in both English and isiZulu explained the study to patients who were awaiting their regular appointments. Participation was voluntary, and those who met the inclusion criteria were invited to complete the questionnaires. After patients signed informed consent forms, questionnaires were administered to the participants in the language of their choice.

Instruments

A questionnaire comprising a demographic section and four instruments was completed by the participants. Participants who had difficulty completing the questionnaires were helped by the trained research assistants. The average time to complete the questionnaires was 45–60 min.

The Diabetes Care Profile (DCP), developed by the Michigan Diabetes and Research Centre,¹⁸ is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the social and psychological factors related to diabetes and its treatment. The instrument contains 234 items arranged in 16 scales. These scales assess the patients’ diabetes attitudes, diabetes beliefs, self-reported diabetes self-care and difficulties with diabetes self-care. The DCP also contains questions concerning demographic information and self-care practices. Cronbach’s alphas ranged from 0.60 to 0.95.¹⁸ The results of studies conducted by Fitzgerald and Davis¹⁸ and Fitzgerald and Anderson¹⁹ found the DCP to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the psychosocial factors related to diabetes and its treatment. The DCP-Support Scale was used in this study.

The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), developed by Goldberg, is a 28-item measure of emotional distress.²⁰ There are four subscales with the 28 items distributed evenly across each. The four subscales are somatic symptoms, anxiety and insomnia, social dysfunction and severe depression. Internal reliability ranges from 0.78 to 0.95;²¹ Cronbach’s alphas ranged from 0.86 to 0.92 in this study. The GHQ was used as a measure of coping in this study with high scores indicating emotional distress and poor coping.

The Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ), developed by Pillay,²² has 15 items, which measure the qualitative and quantitative aspects of a person’s network of relationships that help him or her in adverse circumstances. The SSQ is a bilingual instrument in English and isiZulu. The instrument consists of two parts. Participants are required to list people who provide support and then rate their level of satisfaction with the support on a four-point Likert scale as either very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, satisfied or very satisfied.²² The Cronbach’s alpha value in Pillay’s study was 0.91, while the Cronbach’s alpha value in this study was 0.95.

The WHO-5 has five items and covers positive mood (good spirits; relaxation), vitality (being active; waking up fresh and rested) and general interests (being interested in things).²³ The degree to which these feelings were present in the previous two weeks is scored on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 5 (constantly present). The raw scores are transformed to a scaled score ranging from 0 to 100. A score of less than 52 suggests poor emotional well-being and is a sign for further testing. A score of 28 or less is indicative of depression. The Cronbach’s alpha of the WHO-5 in this study was 0.89.

Where necessary, the questionnaires were translated into isiZulu by an accredited isiZulu translator and were back-translated into English by an isiZulu educator.

Data analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS version 24.²⁴ Continuous variables were summarised as means (M) and standard deviations (s.d.). Medians and interquartile ranges were used for variables that were highly skewed or had significant outliers. Categorical and ordinal variables were summarised using proportions and percentages. Proportions were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to measure the linear dependence between WHO-5 and SSQ scales. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was used to examine the relationship between linear combinations of SSQ variables and linear combinations of GHQ variables.

Ethical consideration

The Biomedical Ethical Research Committee of the University of KwaZulu-Natal granted ethics approval. Consent was obtained from the managers of the public facilities and the Provincial Department of Health. Research assistants explained to patients that participation was voluntary and had no bearing on their treatment.

Results

Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the sample. More than a quarter of the sample were unemployed 114 (28.43%), while 304 (75.81%) had an educational level of below Grade 12. A majority of the patients were female (243; 60.60%), with 276 (68.80%) reporting that they were married and 106 (96.90%) indicating that they lived with five or more people. In terms of ethnic groups, 100 (24.90%) were Black African, three (0.75%) were mixed race, 274 (68.33%) were Indian and 24 (6.00%) were White. There were 200 (49.88%) patients from the private sector and 201 (50.12%) patients from the public sector.

TABLE 1: Demographic characteristics of the total study sample.

The mean age of the study sample was 53.70 years (s.d. = 10.7). The average HbA1c^a was 12.02% (s.d. = 5.00), which is higher than the generally accepted norm of 7% or lower.¹ The average duration of the disease for the sample was 10.3 years (s.d. = 7.9).

The level of satisfaction with social support as measured by the SSQ is shown in Table 2. Most of the participants were very satisfied with the level of support that they received. Most of the participants (327; 82.40%) endorsed the item that they were very satisfied with the person who truly loves them and with the support that they receive when they are ill (310; 78.50%). The means and standard deviations of the SSQ are presented in Table 3.

TABLE 2: Level of satisfaction on the Social Support Questionnaire.

TABLE 3: Means and standard deviations of the Social Support Questionnaire items.

Patients’ social support from family and friends as measured by the DCP is shown in Table 4. Just under half of the patients felt that they wanted a lot of help and support in following a meal plan (189; 47.10%), taking medicine (187; 46.63%), taking care of their feet (196; 48.88%), getting enough physical exercise (182; 45.39%) and testing sugar levels (183; 45.64%). Half of the patients (202; 50.37%) indicated that they want a lot of help and support in handling their feelings about diabetes. Most of the patients indicated that family and friends do help and support them in the abovementioned activities and (191; 47.63%) received help and support in handling their feelings about diabetes. Most of the patients felt that their family and friends accepted them as a patient with diabetes (315; 78.55%), received encouragement about living with diabetes (257; 64.09%) and felt that their family and friends listened to them when they wanted to talk about diabetes (242; 60.35%). A small percentage (50; 12.47%) felt that their family or friends nagged them about diabetes.

TABLE 4: Social support from family and friends on the Diabetes Care Profile.

On the SSQ, the majority of the patients endorsed their spouse as providing the main social support. The DCP yielded similar results with patients indicating that most help in caring for their diabetes came from their spouse (197; 49.13%) and other family members (121; 30.17%). Thirty-seven patients (9.23%) indicated that the doctor helped most with diabetes.

Mean scores comparisons of the SSQ and GHQ by gender and health sectors are displayed in Table 5. The difference in mean scores between women (M = 55.86; s.d. = 6.70) and men (M = 54.87; s.d. = 8.32) was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference between the public and private health care sectors with mean scores of (M = 55.64; s.d. = 6.60) and (M = 55.31; s.d. = 8.10), respectively. On the GHQ, 159 (40%) participants reported elevated somatic symptoms, 149 (37.16%) had high levels of anxiety, 290 (72.32%) reported high levels of social dysfunction and 78 (19%) had severe depressive symptoms. Women (M = 25.50; s.d. = 16.11) had significantly higher mean GHQ scores compared with men (M = 18.40; s.d. = 12.80). The public sector mean GHQ score (M = 25.20; s.d. = 15.84) was significantly higher than that of the private sector (M = 20.16; s.d. = 14.30). The total GHQ mean score (M = 22.70; s.d. = 15.30) was elevated, indicating distress and difficulty in coping.

TABLE 5: Comparison of the Social Support Questionnaire and General Health Questionnaire mean scores for gender and health sector.

A canonical correlation was used to identify and measure the associations between multiple SSQ and GHQ variables. The null hypothesis of the canonical correlation was that there is no linear correlation between the support (SSQ) and coping (GHQ) variables. The null hypothesis that social support variables are independent from the coping variables is tested using Wilks’s lambda. For this study, the Wilks’s lambda results were: Λ = 0.78759; F = 1.46332; df = 60; p < 0.013. In general, Wilks’s lambda is the opposite of the R-squared, where a near zero indicates that there was a significant difference between SSQ and the GHQ (p < 0.014), which suggests that there is a significant relationship between social support and coping. The null hypothesis that there is no relationship between the two sets of variables is rejected; therefore, it can be concluded that the two sets of variables are dependent. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to measure the strength of linear association between individual SSQ (social support) and GHQ (coping) variables. There was a small negative correlation between the two variables (r = -0.099, N = 401, p < 0.05), with high levels of support associated with a decrease in coping.

A univariate analysis of variance was used, to explore which support items were significant and had a significant effect on coping. The following items were significant: ‘Who can you count on to listen to you when you need to talk?’ (p < 0.025); ‘Who can you really count on to give advice, guidance or useful suggestions that would help you to avoid mistakes?’ (p < 0.004), ‘Who do you feel truly loves you deeply?’ (p < 0.030), ‘Who can you count on to comfort or console you when you are very upset?’ (p < 0.003) and ‘Who can you really count on when you get into trouble?’ (p < 0.033).

The relationship between the WHO-5 and the SSQ scales was investigated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. There was a small statistically significant (p < 0.01) positive correlation between the scales (ρ = +0.14) which suggests participants who had good support reported better levels of well-being. Three items on the SSQ showed statistical significance (p < 0.05). These items were: ‘Who could you really count on to help in an emergency?’ (p < 0.036), ‘Who can you really count on to give advice, guidance or useful suggestions that would help you to avoid mistakes?’ (p < 0.035); and ‘Who do you feel will help if a family member or someone close to you died?’ (p < 0.037).

In terms of ethnic groups, the following results were found: there was a strong negative correlation between social support and coping in the White ethnic group (r = -0.58, n = 24, p < 0.01), with high levels of support associated with decreased symptoms of emotional distress (which indicates better coping). There was a small positive correlation between social support and coping in the Black ethnic group (r = 0.124, n = 100, p = 0.219). There was a medium negative correlation in the Indian ethnic group (r = -0.34, n = 273, p = 0.580). There was no statistical significance in either group.

The linear correlation between HbA1c and social support was not statistically significant (r = 0.051, N = 401, p < 0.335). This indicates that there is no association between glycaemic control and social support. There was a statistically significant, but small positive correlation between HbA1c and coping (r = 0.17, N = 401, p < 0.001), with an increase in HbA1c levels associated with an increase in emotional distress.

Discussion

The findings indicate an inverse relationship between social support and coping, which suggests that an increase in social support is associated with a decrease in emotional distress. Participants who reported high levels of social support had better well-being levels. There was a small positive correlation between GHQ and HbA1c. Women and patients who attended public sector health facilities indicated poor coping.

The inverse relationship between social support and coping indicates that increased social support is associated with decreased emotional distress. Specific emotional support was associated with decreased emotional distress. Participants who endorsed high levels of social support had better levels of well-being. This is in keeping with a local study which had similar findings.²⁵ Specific social support in terms of emergency situations was associated with better well-being levels.

Participants from both the private and the public sectors were satisfied with the level of support that they received. In this sample, most participants lived with five or more people, and the majority were married. The majority of patients indicated that most support came from their spouse or other family members. This is in agreement with the literature that shows that family support plays a vital role in the management of diabetes⁶ and can assist with the self-care behaviours of the patient.²⁶ As noted by Litman,²⁷ the family is the most important context in which illness can be resolved; therefore, social support from family can help in treatment outcomes for the patient. It is, therefore, important to include the family as part of the treatment regime of the patient. Families of patients with diabetes can also be referred to mental health care practitioners, who can facilitate support groups for families and help them cope with the needs of their family members with diabetes.

Most participants reported that they needed help with diet, medicine and exercise. Participants also indicated that they receive practical support, such as with diet and exercise, from family and friends. These findings were similar to a study conducted by Oftedal⁵ who found that patients viewed practical support as being helpful and valuable, which also stimulated effective diabetes management. Practical support and social support were found to be highly correlated with adherence.^22,28 Adherence to diet, medication and exercise helps with glycaemic control. The treatment goal in diabetes is to achieve strict control of blood sugar levels,²⁹ thereby delaying or preventing long-term complications. Uncontrolled blood sugar levels can lead to serious diseases affecting the heart and blood vessels, eyes, kidneys and nerves.¹⁴ Therefore, practical support received from family and friends in assisting with adherence to medication, diet and exercise forms an important part in the treatment goal for achieving good glycaemic control.

Although the White ethnic group sample number was small, they reported high levels of social support which was associated with decreased levels of emotional distress and better coping. Historically in South Africa, the White ethnic group had better access to specialised health care compared to other ethnic groups.^30,31 There is still a disparity in health care services with most patients from the Black ethnic group accessing public health care facilities.³¹ Patients from previously disadvantaged groups often do not understand the importance of adherence to treatment and the severity of the potential long-term complications.³²

In this study, both men and women indicated that they were satisfied with the level of support they received, which is contrary to other studies which found that women had lower levels of support compared with men.^33,34 However, females had a high mean score on the GHQ, which indicates that women had greater difficulty coping with the disease. This is in keeping with other studies that found women tend to cope poorly with the disease.^33,35 In South Africa, women are often the breadwinners in the home and have difficulty coping with the added demands of their chronic disease in addition to taking care of the needs of the family.^34,36 Furthermore, because of low socioeconomic status and poor access to health care, women often have a lack of knowledge about the disease and its treatment,³⁶ which impedes positive treatment outcomes.

There was no association between HbA1c and social support. Studies are not clear about social support and diabetes control. Some studies show that poor social support is strongly associated with poor diabetes control^11,28 while others found that support was not associated with metabolic control.^25,37 Although most of the participants were satisfied with their level of social support, the high HbA1c level of 12.02% indicates that patients in this sample are not coping well with the demands of the disease. Given that the generally accepted norm is 7% or lower,¹ the high HbA1c level indicates poor management of the disease. Psychological stress with a helplessness reaction can lead to an activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which results in high cortisol levels which in turn antagonise the actions of insulin.³⁸ Support may reduce the perception that a situation is stressful thereby decreasing neuroendocrine responses to stress.³⁹ Although family and friends are willing to render support, they may not know how to provide better and more effective support as reported in the DAWN2 study, where 37.1% of respondents were frustrated that they did not know how best to help the patient with diabetes but wanted to be more involved in their care.⁴⁰ Therefore, family and friends need to be advised by health care providers as to how to render support that will positively impact treatment outcomes.⁴¹

Diabetes is a demanding disease, which involves lifestyle changes in terms of diet, exercise and adherence to medication. Patients can feel ‘burned out’ and overwhelmed by these demands,⁴² which lead to diabetes distress. In this study, there was a small positive correlation between HbA1c and the GHQ, which indicates that an increase in HbA1c levels is associated with an increase in emotional distress. High levels of HbA1c are associated with high levels of diabetes distress,^43,44 which can lead to various complications. Often the psychological aspects of the disease, such as diabetes distress, are neglected which affects glycaemic control.^43,45 In some patients, high diabetes distress can negatively influence their self-management and adherence to medication, with consequential effects on glycaemic control, while in other patients, poor glycaemic control can lead to distress and can influence disease management.⁴³ In this regard, the family can play a role in assisting the patient by providing not only practical support but also emotional support. Patients and the family will also benefit from consultations with a mental health practitioner, as well as lay counsellors, lay support groups and faith-based groups to help them manage and cope with diabetes distress.

Patients from the public sector had a high mean score on the GHQ scale, which indicates poor coping. Having a chronic disease means attending health care services often; therefore, health care practitioners become a source of support and play a critical role in the management of diabetes.⁴⁶ However, patients who utilise the state services are seen by different health care practitioners when they visit the hospital. A further concern is that, more often than not, the practitioners in the state services have extremely high service loads and lack of basic resources. Given these problems of not having a regular practitioner seeing patients, high work load and poor resources, practitioners do not have sufficient time to establish empathy and good doctor–patient relations, as shown in other research.⁴⁷ Researchers have identified the lack of communication between patients and health care providers as an area of concern. However, empathy and building trust with patients are helpful to bring about behaviour change in patients.⁴⁸ Health care providers, therefore, play an essential supportive role in the treatment of the patient with diabetes.^8,48 Health care providers need to take cognisance of their supportive role in treating patients by adopting empathetic relationships with their patients and also increasing the level of communication, which will lead to greater social support for the patient.

The facts are reasonably well presented but there is little interrogation of the results including poor comparison of literature to either support or refute claims.

Conclusion

This study supports the findings of the growing body of literature which emphasises the need for, and the importance of, social support in helping the patient with diabetes cope with the disease and to improve adherence to treatment. Health care providers need to take cognisance of psychosocial factors in the treatment regime of the patient. The mental health practitioner should form part of the multidisciplinary team involved in type 2 diabetes management to facilitate support groups for family members and provide interventions for both the patient with diabetes and their families. Policy guidelines should include the family as a part of the treatment plan for the patient with diabetes.

Limitations

A limitation of this study is the cross-sectional design. Surveys and questionnaires carry a huge amount of research bias. While this was an exploratory study, future studies to investigate the link between social support and coping in diabetes should use more rigorous methods. Furthermore, some of the ethnic groups’ samples sizes were small and, therefore, results cannot be generalised.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Stanger Hospital, the KwaDukuza Clinic, the Ballito Medical Centre and the private medical practices who gave them permission to conduct the research at their facilities. They would also like to thank all the patients for participating in this study.

This study was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) and the University of KwaZulu-Natal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions

S.R. collected all data and together with B.J.P. designed the project. In addition, B.J.P. made conceptual contributions, supervised the study and contributed to the writing and editing of the article. W.S. undertook and supervised the statistical analysis and write-up of the statistical results.

References

International Diabetes Federation. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes [homepage on the Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Sep 25]. Available from: https://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/IDF%20T2DM%Guideline.pdf
World Health Organization. Global report on diabetes [homepage on the Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Sep 25]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204871/1/9789241565257_eng.pdf
Keogh KM, Smith SM, White P, et al. Psychological family intervention for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(2):105–113.
Tol A, Baghbanian A, Rahimi A, Shojaeizadeh D, Mohebbi B, Majlessi F. The relationship between perceived social support from family and diabetes control among patients with diabetes type 1 and type 2. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2011;10:1–8.
Oftedal B. Perceived support from family and friends among adults with type 2 diabetes. Eur Diabetes Nurs. 2014;11(2):43–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn.247
Rintala TM, Jaatinen P, Paavilainen EÅ-KP. Interrelation between adult persons with diabetes and their family: A systematic review of the literature. J Fam Nurs. 2013;19(1):3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840712471899
Karlsen B, Idsoe T, Hanestad BR, Murberg T, Bru E. Perceptions of support, diabetes-related coping and psychological well-being in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Psychol Health Med. 2004;9(1):53–70.
Goetz K, Szecseny J, Campbell S, et al. The importance of social support for people with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study with general practitioners, practice nurses and patients. Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:1–9.
Figueira ALG, Boas LCGV, De Freitas MCF, Foss MC, Pace AE. Perception of social support by individuals with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers. Acta Paul Enferm. 2012;25(Special Issue 1):20–26.
Grey M. Coping and diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum. 2000;13(3):167.
Chida Y, Hamer M. An association of adverse psychosocial factors with diabetes mellitus: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal cohort studies. Diabetologia. 2008;51(12):2168–2178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-1154-1
Elliott TR, Shewchuk RM, Miller DM, Richards JS. Profiles in problem solving: Psychological well-being and distress among persons with diabetes mellitus. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2001;8(4):283–291. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011920914079
Karlsen B, Bru E. Coping styles among adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Psychol Health Med. 2002;7(3):245–259.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas [homepage on the Internet]. 7th ed. 2015 [cited 25 Sep 2016]. Available from: http://www.idf.org/idf-diabetes-atlas-seventh-edition
Statistics South Africa. Mortality and causes of death in South Africa, 2014: Findings from death notification [homepage on the Internet]. 2015 [cited 25 Sep 2016]. Available from: http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P03093/P030932014.pdf
Karlsen B, Oftedal B, Bru E. The relationship between clinical indicators, coping styles, perceived support and diabetes-related distress among adults with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(2):391–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05751.x
Hara Y, Hisatomi M, Ito H, Nakao M, Tsuboi K, Ishihara Y. Effects of gender, age, family support, and treatment on perceived stress and coping of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biopsychosoc Med. 2014;8:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-8-16
Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and validation of the diabetes care profile. Eval Health Prof. 1996;19:208–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327879601900205
Fitzgerald JT, Anderson RM, Gruppen LD, et al. The reliability of the diabetes care profile for African Americans. Eval Health Prof. 1998;21(1):52–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327879802100103
Sterling M. General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28). J Physiother. 2011;57:259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70060-1
Jackson C. The general health questionnaire. Occup Med. 2006;57(1):79. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql169
Pillay BJ. A study of the relation between health attitudes, values and beliefs and health seeking behaviour with special reference to a representative sample of Black South Africans [unpublished PHD-MED thesis]. Durban, University of KwaZulu- Natal; 1993.
World Health Organization. Use of wellbeing measures in primary health care/The DepCare project [homepage on the Internet]. 1998 [cited 25 Sep 2016]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/130750/E60246.pdf
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2016.
Westaway MS, Seager JR, Rheeder P, Van Zyl DG. The effects of social support on health, well-being and management of diabetes mellitus: A black South African perspective. Ethn Health. 2005;10(1):73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355785052000323047
Albright TL, Parchman M, Burge SK. Predictors of self-care behaviours in adults with type 2 diabetes: An RRNeST study. Fam Med. 2001;33(5):354–360.
Litman TJ. The family as a basic unit in health and medical care: A social-behavioural overview. Soc Sci Med. 1974;8(9–10):287–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(74)90072-9
DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2004;23(2):207–218.
Gonzalez JS, Esbitt SA, Schneider HE, Osborne PJ, Kupperman EG. Psychological issues in adults with type 2 diabetes. In: Pagoto S, editor. Psychological co-morbidities of physical illness: A behavioral medicine perspective. New York: Springer, 2011; p. 73–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0029-6_2
Pillay BJ. A model of help-seeking behaviour for urban blacks. S Afri J Psychol. 1996;26(1):4–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124639602600102
Van der Hoeven M, Kruger A, Greeff M. Differences in health care seeking behaviour between rural and urban communities in South Africa. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-31
Steyn K, Fourie J, Temple N. Chronic diseases of lifestyle in South Africa: 1995–2005. Technical report [homepage on the Internet]. Cape Town: South African Medical Research Council; 2006 [cited 2016 Aug 30]. Available from: www.mrc.ac.za/chronic/cdl1995-2005.pdf
Chiu CJ, Wray LA. Gender differences in functional limitations in adults living with type 2 diabetes: Biobehavioral and psychosocial mediators. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(1):71–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9226-0
Penckofer S, Ferrans CE, Velsor-Friedrich B, Savoy S. The psychological impact of living with diabetes: Women’s day-to-day experiences. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33(4):680–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721707304079
Madhu K, Sridha GR. Coping with diabetes: A paradigm for coping with a chronic illness. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2001;21:103–111.
Mendenhall E, Norris SA. When HIV is ordinary and diabetes new: Remaking suffering in a South African township. Glob Public Health. 2015;10(4):449–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.998698
Trief PM, Grant W, Elbert K, Weinstock RS. Family environment, glycemic control, and the psychosocial adaptation of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(2):241–245. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.2.241
Björntorp P. Body fat distribution, insulin resistance, and metabolic diseases. Nutrition. 1997;13(9):795–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(97)00191-3
Cohen S, Syme SL. Social support and health. San Franciso, CA: Academic Press; 1985.
Kovacs Burns K, Nicolucci A, Holt RIG, et al. Diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs second study (DAWN2™): Cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30(7):778–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12239
Scollan-Koliopoulos M. Consideration for legacies about diabetes and self-care for the family with a multigenerational occurrence of type 2 diabetes. Nurs Health Sci. 2004;6:223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.00196.x
Polonsky WH. Emotional and quality of life aspects of diabetes management. Curr Diab Rep. 2002;2:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-002-0075-5
Fisher L, Mullan JT, Arean P, Glasgow RE, Hessler D, Masharani U. Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(1):23–28. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1238
Ramkisson S, Pillay BJ, Sartorius B. Diabetes distress and related factors in South African adults with type 2 diabetes. J Endocrinol Metabol Diabetes S Afr. 2016;21(2):35–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/16089677.2016.1205822
Strandberg RB, Graue M, Wentzel-Larsen T, Peyrot M, Rokne B. Relationships of diabetes-specific emotional distress, depression, anxiety, and overall well-being with HbA1c in adult persons with type 1 diabetes. J Psychosom Res. 2014;77(3):174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.06.015
Kadirvelu A, Sadasivan S, Ng SH. Social support in type II diabetes care: A case of too little, too late. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2012;5:407–417. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S37183
Westaway MS, Rheeder P, Van Zyl DG, Seager JR. Interpersonal and organizational dimensions of patients satisfaction: The moderating effects of health status. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(4):337–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg042
Oftedal B, Karlsen B, Bru E. Perceived support from healthcare practitioners among adults with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(7):1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05329.x

Footnote

a. HbA1C is an average measure of assessing glycaemic control over a period of three months (World Health Organisation, 2011).

Crossref Citations

1. Association between Social Support and Diabetes Burden among Elderly Patients with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study from Turkey
Ummuhan Pinar Kaya, Ozden Dedeli Caydam
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences vol: 7 issue: 2 first page: 86 year: 2019
doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_44_18

2. Understanding dietary behaviour change after a diagnosis of diabetes: A qualitative investigation of adults with type 2 diabetes
Roshan R. Rigby, Lauren T. Williams, Lana J. Mitchell, Lauren Ball, Kyra Hamilton, Jeffrey S. Hallam
PLOS ONE vol: 17 issue: 12 first page: e0278984 year: 2022
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278984

3. The relationships between social support, medication adherence, and glycemic control among inpatients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey in Xi’an, China
Haiyan Li, Hui Min, Lu Zhang, Youjia Li, Jing Wang, Xiaoni Jia
Frontiers in Pharmacology vol: 16 year: 2025
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1634768

4. The Role of Community Organisation, Religion, Spirituality and Cultural Beliefs on Diabetes Social Support and Self-Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Integrative Literature Review
Israel Bekele Molla, Virginia Hagger, Mette Juel Rothmann, Bodil Rasmussen
Journal of Religion and Health vol: 64 issue: 4 first page: 2407 year: 2025
doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02233-y

5. Social networks, perceived social support, and HbA1c in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in urban Ghana
Marian Botchway, Rachel E. Davis, Anwar T. Merchant, Lambert T. Appiah, Osei Sarfo-Kantanka, Spencer Moore
Ethnicity & Health vol: 28 issue: 2 first page: 281 year: 2023
doi: 10.1080/13557858.2022.2033172

6. Association between social support and health-related outcomes among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting
Keith Dihao Tan, Shu Yun Tan, Hui Li Koh, Edwin Fueng Chee Liang, Sabrina Kay Wye Wong
Singapore Medical Journal year: 2024
doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2023-121

7. Social support, depression, anxiety, and quality of life among persons living with type 2 diabetes: a path analysis
Henry Obo, Nuworza Kugbey, Ethel Atefoe
South African Journal of Psychology vol: 51 issue: 4 first page: 575 year: 2021
doi: 10.1177/0081246320984285

8. Calidad de Vida, Malestar Emocional y Tiempo de Diagnóstico en Pacientes con Diabetes Tipo 2 en un Municipio de Hidalgo, México
Daniela Andrea Bautista Márquez
Huella de la Palabra issue: 14 first page: 8 year: 2020
doi: 10.37646/huella.v14i14.13

9. Psychosocial factors in adherence to pharmacological treatment and diabetes mellitus control in patients over 65
Alfredo Lara-Morales, Ana Gandarillas-Grande, Antonio Díaz-Holgado, Pilar Serrano-Gallardo
Atención Primaria vol: 54 issue: 5 first page: 102302 year: 2022
doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102302

10. The effect of the motivational interview program on coping and adaptation of patients with type 2 diabetes: An action research study
Leyla MUSLU, Melek ARDAHAN
Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences vol: 6 issue: 1 first page: 33 year: 2022
doi: 10.30621/jbachs.930592

11. Unmet needs for social support and diabetes-related distress among people living with type 2 diabetes in Thai Binh, Vietnam: a cross-sectional study
Diep Khong Thi, Bai Nguyen Xuan, Cuong Le Duc, Tine Gammeltoft, Jens Søndergaard, Dan Wolf Meyrowitsch, Ib Christian Bygbjerg, Jannie Nielsen
BMC Public Health vol: 21 issue: 1 year: 2021
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11562-6

12. Challenges of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management From the Perspective of Patients: Conventional Content Analysis
Soghra Nikpour, Neda Mehrdad, Mahnaz Sanjari, Maryam Aalaa, Ramin Heshmat, Mahboobeh Khabaz Mafinejad, Bagher Larijani, Mahin Nomali, Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh
Interactive Journal of Medical Research vol: 11 issue: 2 first page: e41933 year: 2022
doi: 10.2196/41933

13. Moderate Resilience, Social Support, and Coping in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Insights From the Arab and Muslim Context
Nusaiba Al-Salti, Fawwaz Alaloul, Iman Al-Hashmi, Omar Alzaabi, Omar Al Omari
Journal of Transcultural Nursing vol: 36 issue: 6 first page: 681 year: 2025
doi: 10.1177/10436596251341766

14. Nurse-Led Programs Focusing on Social Support for People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping Review
Isabela Mendonça Rodrigues dos Santos, Isaura Letícia Palmeira Tavares Rolim, Aurean D’Eça Júnior, Maria Almira Bulcão Loureiro, Diogo Matheus Barros da Silva, Geysa Santos Góis Lopes
Aquichan vol: 24 issue: 1 first page: 1 year: 2024
doi: 10.5294/aqui.2024.24.1.2

15. Psychosocial Experience of Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Zaqqi Ubaidillah, Ratna Wulandari, Faqih Ruhyanudin
Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities vol: 32 issue: 4 first page: 1267 year: 2024
doi: 10.47836/pjssh.32.4.02

16. Quality of Life, Social Support, Acceptance of Illness, and Self-Efficacy among Pregnant Women with Hyperglycemia
Grażyna Iwanowicz-Palus, Marta Zarajczyk, Beata Pięta, Agnieszka Bień
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health vol: 16 issue: 20 first page: 3941 year: 2019
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203941

17. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological distress and biological rhythm in China’s general population: A path analysis model
Yikai Dou, Huanhuan Fan, Xiao Yang, Yue Du, Yu Wang, Min Wang, Zijian Zhang, Xiongwei Qi, Yuling Luo, Ruiqing Luo, Xiaohong Ma, Abraham Salinas-Miranda
PLOS ONE vol: 17 issue: 7 first page: e0271285 year: 2022
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271285

18. Social support effects on diabetes management by South African emerging adults: A replication and extension study
Elné Visagie, Esmé van Rensburg, Elmarí Deacon
Journal of Psychology in Africa vol: 28 issue: 6 first page: 504 year: 2018
doi: 10.1080/14330237.2018.1544392

19. Eight Weeks of Lifestyle Change: What are the Effects of the Healthy Lifestyle Community Programme (Cohort 1) on Cortisol Awakening Response (CAR) and Perceived Stress?
Corinna Anand, Karin Hengst, Reinhold Gellner, Heike Englert
Chronic Stress vol: 6 year: 2022
doi: 10.1177/24705470221099206

20. Social Support as a Mediator between Depressive Symptoms and Self-Care Activities in Adults Patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Pandan Enggarwati, Debie Dahlia, Riri Maria
Journal of Public Health Research vol: 11 issue: 2 year: 2022
doi: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2734

21. Barriers and Facilitators to Taking Medication in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study Based on the Transtheoretical Model
Baolu Zhang, Arpaporn Powwattana, Jutatip Sillabutra, Gang Liu, Siyu Li, Surintorn Kalampakorn
The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care vol: 51 issue: 2 first page: 180 year: 2025
doi: 10.1177/26350106251319541

22. Perceived Social Support in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Fotini Laopoulou, Martha Kelesi, Georgia Fasoi, Georgios Vasilopoulos, Maria Polikandrioti
Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing vol: 47 issue: 1 first page: 65 year: 2020
doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000614

23. Relationships among social support, coping style, self‐stigma, and quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A multicentre, cross‐sectional study
Ruzhen Luo, Yunan Ji, Yan‐hui Liu, Hongyu Sun, Siyuan Tang, Xuechun Li
International Wound Journal vol: 20 issue: 3 first page: 716 year: 2023
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13914

24. Diabetes-Related Worries and Coping Among Youth and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Lindsay Taraban, Rachel Wasserman, Viena T Cao, Sahar S Eshtehardi, Barbara J Anderson, Debbe Thompson, David G Marrero, Marisa E Hilliard
Journal of Pediatric Psychology vol: 47 issue: 10 first page: 1145 year: 2022
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac055

25. Tip 2 Diabetes Mellituslu Geriatrik Bireylerin Hastalık Algısı ve Sosyal İlişkilerinin Belirlenmesi
Hatice ÖZGÜR, Nurhan DOĞAN
Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi vol: 7 issue: 4 first page: 574 year: 2022
doi: 10.26453/otjhs.1087547

26. A Pilot Study on Diabetes Distress, Insulin Growth Factor-I, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3, and HbA1c in Diabetic Patients
Tahiruddin Tahiruddin, Diah Indriastuti, Syahrul Syahrul, Andi Masyitha Irwan, Satriya Pranata
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing vol: 15 issue: 1 first page: 19 year: 2025
doi: 10.14710/nmjn.v15i1.58052

27. Prevalence of depression and its associated factors among patients with diabetes mellitus at Tirunesh-Beijing general hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Nigus Alemnew Engidaw, Abate Dargie Wubetu, Elyas Admasu Basha
BMC Public Health vol: 20 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8360-2

28. Assessing oral health and the minimally important differences in oral health‐related quality of life of non‐diabetic and diabetic patients: a cross‐sectional study
A Chen, ST Ng, V Goh, S‐C Siu, KWS Yeung, YC Tsang, Q Wang, WK Leung
Australian Dental Journal vol: 69 issue: 3 first page: 206 year: 2024
doi: 10.1111/adj.13017

29. The Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on Women’s Health and Well-being During Their Reproductive Years: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review
Aycan Celik, Rita Forde, Simona Racaru, Angus Forbes, Jackie Sturt
Current Diabetes Reviews vol: 18 issue: 2 year: 2022
doi: 10.2174/1573399817666210118144743

30. A systematic review of the relationships among psychosocial factors and coping in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Melissa A. McCoy, Laurie A. Theeke
International Journal of Nursing Sciences vol: 6 issue: 4 first page: 468 year: 2019
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.09.003

31. Exploring the thoughts, emotions, and behaviours related to the self-management practices of adults with type 2 diabetes
Elné Visagie, Elmari Deacon, Rümando Kok
Health Psychology Open vol: 11 year: 2024
doi: 10.1177/20551029241278976

32. The mediating/moderating role of cultural context factors on self-care practices among those living with diabetes in rural Appalachia
Brittany L. Smalls, Adebola Adegboyega, Ellen Combs, Matthew Rutledge, Philip M. Westgate, Md. Tofial Azam, Felipe De La Barra, Lovoria B. Williams, Nancy E. Schoenberg
BMC Public Health vol: 21 issue: 1 year: 2021
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11777-7

33. The needs of patients with diabetes for the prevention and treatment of foot complications in Thailand: A qualitative descriptive study
Piyawan Kanan, Boonying Siribamrungwong, Thipapron Tarawanich, Saritpat Arapinth, Phunyada Napunnaphat
Belitung Nursing Journal vol: 9 issue: 6 first page: 586 year: 2023
doi: 10.33546/bnj.2835

34. Depression and anxiety among type two diabetes mellitus patients with comorbidity: A multicenter cross-sectional study in Northwest Ethiopia
Fasil Bayafers Tamene, Tilaye Arega Moges, Getachew Yitayew Tarekegn, Samuel Berihun Dagnew, Tigabu Eskeziya Zerihun, Abel Temeche Kassaw, Desalegn Addis Mussie, Abaynesh Fentahun Bekalu, Woretaw Sisay Zewdu, Samuel Agegnew Wondm
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports vol: 25 first page: 101097 year: 2026
doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2026.101097

35. Self-Management Social Support in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Concept Analysis
Tariq N. Al-Dwaikat, Amira Mohammed Ali, Haitham Khatatbeh, Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh
Nursing Forum vol: 2023 first page: 1 year: 2023
doi: 10.1155/2023/1753982

36. Teoría específica sobre las conductas familiares de las personas con diabetes tipo 2
Juan Alberto López-González, Yolanda Bañuelos-Barrera, Laura Ruíz-Paloalto, Alicia Álvarez-Aguirre
SANUS issue: 7 first page: 40 year: 2019
doi: 10.36789/sanus.vi7.100

37. Low Social Support and Risk for Depression in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Akhmad Azmiardi, Bhisma Murti, Ratih Puspita Febrinasari, Didik Gunawan Tamtomo
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health vol: 55 issue: 1 first page: 37 year: 2022
doi: 10.3961/jpmph.21.490

38. Provider perspectives on emotional health care for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Dominican Republic
Deshira D. Wallace, Nastacia M. Pereira, Humberto Gonzalez Rodriguez, Clare Barrington, Palash Chandra Banik
PLOS Global Public Health vol: 2 issue: 11 first page: e0000537 year: 2022
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000537

39. Received and perceived support subscales of the Berlin Social Support Scales in women diagnosed with breast cancer attending the breast clinic at Tygerberg hospital: structure and correlates
Rizwana Roomaney, Ashraf Kagee, Nina Knoll
South African Journal of Psychology vol: 50 issue: 1 first page: 54 year: 2020
doi: 10.1177/0081246319831819

40. The Influence of Family-Oriented Enabling Psychological Nursing on Posttraumatic Stress and Fear of Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Cancer
Yue Shi, Zhongye Wu, Hong Wang, Wufan Kong, Xiaowan Zhuansun, Muhammad Zia-Ul-Haq
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine vol: 2022 first page: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.1155/2022/6720287

41. Influence of perceived social support on depression among Type 2 diabetes patients: a concurrent cross-sectional mixed-method study
George Ekem-Ferguson, John Tetteh, Emilia A Udofia, Alfred Doku, Swithin M Swaray, Sheriff Mohammed, Alfred E Yawson
Health Sciences Investigations Journal vol: 1 issue: 2 first page: 93 year: 2020
doi: 10.46829/hsijournal.2020.6.1.2.93-104

42. Psychosocial Facilitators and Barriers to Type 2 Diabetes Management in Adults: A Meta-Synthesis
P. Padma Sri Lekha, E.P. Abdul Azeez
Current Diabetes Reviews vol: 20 issue: 8 year: 2024
doi: 10.2174/0115733998283436231207093250

43. Pathway From Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis to Action: How to Move People Forward
Michelle D.S. Boakye, Sheridan Miyamoto, Deborah Greenwood, Jennifer Kraschnewski, Kimberly Van Haitsma, Marie Boltz
Diabetes Spectrum vol: 36 issue: 3 first page: 264 year: 2023
doi: 10.2337/ds22-0058

44. Perceived Social Support and Glycemic Control among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Deepan chakravarthi, S. Arun Murugan, Shruthee SG
Healthline vol: 15 issue: 1 first page: 7 year: 2024
doi: 10.51957/Healthline_593_2024

45. The Relationship between the Quality of Parent-Child Interaction and Social Support of Friends with Type 1 Diabetes Self-Management in Adolescents: A Descriptive Study
Narges Serajpour, Nazanin Abed, Asadollah Rajab, Mahdieh Yasari azad
Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences vol: 24 issue: 11 first page: 997 year: 2026
doi: 10.66224/jrums.24.11.997

46. Examining the role of digital and non-digital support received in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study
Jacey Henrichs, Kianna M. Arthur, Jordan Schueler, Sherecce Fields
Health and Technology vol: 15 issue: 4 first page: 759 year: 2025
doi: 10.1007/s12553-025-00991-7

47. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare Rating, Diabetes Self-efficacy, and Diabetes Management Among Non-pregnant Women of Childbearing Age: Does Socioeconomic Status Matter?
Kyrah K. Brown, Tiffany B. Kindratt, Godfred O. Boateng, Grace Ellen Brannon
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities vol: 9 issue: 3 first page: 967 year: 2022
doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01036-1

48. Specific Primer Design of Leucine Rich Repeats and Guanylate Kinase Domain Containing (LRGUK) Genes in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients
Miftahul Mushlih, Siti Nur Maghfiroh Tis’iyyah , Chylen Setiyo Rini, Azizah Krismonita Sari
Medical Technology and Public Health Journal vol: 6 issue: 2 first page: 195 year: 2022
doi: 10.33086/mtphj.v6i2.3476

49. Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
Vânia Lídia Soares, Sara Lemos, Maria do Céu Barbieri-Figueiredo, Maria Carminda Soares Morais, Carlos Sequeira
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health vol: 20 issue: 2 first page: 1325 year: 2023
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021325

50. The acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) reduce stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Bistara Nobel, Susanti Susanti, Satriya Pranata, Mustamu Cherry
Scripta Medica vol: 54 issue: 4 first page: 329 year: 2023
doi: 10.5937/scriptamed54-45794

51. Enhancing self-care management in diabetic patients: a randomized controlled trial exploring the interplay of social support, self-efficacy, and empowerment
Nevin F. Ibrahim, Hanaa A. Nofal, Hossam Tharwat Ali, Dina S. El-Rafey, Noura Almadani, Rasha Mahfouz, Reda M. Khodary
Acta Diabetologica vol: 62 issue: 10 first page: 1691 year: 2025
doi: 10.1007/s00592-025-02498-z

52. Being the supporter: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the role of caregivers in the self-management of type 2 diabetes
Lisa Newson, Jessica E. Brown, Stephanie Dugdale
Psychology & Health vol: 40 issue: 3 first page: 377 year: 2025
doi: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2231004

53. Exploring type 2 diabetes self-management practices in rural Bangladesh: facilitators, barriers and expectations—a qualitative study protocol
Hasina Akhter Chowdhury, Anju E Joham, Ashraful Kabir, A K M Fazlur Rahman, Liaquat Ali, Cheryce L Harrison, Baki Billah
BMJ Open vol: 14 issue: 5 first page: e081385 year: 2024
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081385

54. Pilates-Based Exercise and Its Impact on Nutritional Status and Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Beatriz Ruiz-Ariza, Agustín Aibar-Almazán, Fidel Hita-Contreras, Yolanda Castellote-Caballero, María del Carmen Carcelén-Fraile
Diagnostics vol: 15 issue: 22 first page: 2913 year: 2025
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15222913

55. Adherence to Insulin, Emotional Distress, and Trust in Physician Among Patients with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study
Lucine Halepian, Mary Bou Saleh, Souheil Hallit, Lydia Rabbaa Khabbaz
Diabetes Therapy vol: 9 issue: 2 first page: 713 year: 2018
doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0389-1

56. The Role of Social Support and Interpersonal Trust to Improve Compliance of Iron Supplementation amongst Adolescent Girls
Hanna Tabita Hasianna Silitonga, Lutfi Agus Salim, Ira Nurmala, Rachmat Hargono, Hari Basuki Notobroto, Nurul Hartini, Septiana Purwandini
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal vol: 30 issue: 1 first page: 75 year: 2023
doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_277_22

57. The depression and anxiety status and influencing factors survey of international students during COVID-19 outbreak period in Hunan, China: A cross-sectional study
Ishmail Conteh, Bashiru Turay, Kodzovi Sylvain Dovi, Sheku Gbetuwa
Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry vol: 47-48 first page: 100133 year: 2024
doi: 10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100133

58. Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Hindi Version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
M A Sanjeev, Swati Mittal, Thangaraja Arumugam
Journal of Health Management vol: 27 issue: 4 first page: 543 year: 2025
doi: 10.1177/09720634251344697

59. Anxiety and depression among people with type 2 diabetes visiting diabetes clinics of Pokhara Metropolitan, Nepal: a cross-sectional study
Shishir Paudel, Shankar Prasad Khanal, Sujan Gautam, Anisha Chalise, Tara Nath Koirala, Sujan Babu Marahatta
BMJ Open vol: 13 issue: 1 first page: e064490 year: 2023
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064490

60. The perceived social support, life events, and depressive features among patients with diabetes mellitus
Nizar B Said, Mohammed Hayek, Aseel E Alsayed
Chronic Illness vol: 21 issue: 2 first page: 205 year: 2025
doi: 10.1177/17423953231209462

61. Psychosocial distress, clinical variables and self-management activities associated with type 2 diabetes: a study in Ghana
Margaret Amankwah-Poku, Albert G. B. Amoah, Araba Sefa-Dedeh, Josephine Akpalu
Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology vol: 6 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.1186/s40842-020-00102-7

62. Depression and suicidal ideation among individuals with type-2 diabetes mellitus, a cross-sectional study from an urban slum area of Karachi, Pakistan
Hina Sharif, Shah Sumaya Jan, Sana Sharif, Tooba Seemi, Hira Naeem, Zahida Jawed
Frontiers in Public Health vol: 11 year: 2023
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1135964

63. Social Support Intervention for Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Claudia Milena Garizábalo-Dávila, Alba Luz Rodríguez-Acelas, Rita Mattiello, Wilson Cañon-Montañez
Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials vol: Volume 13 first page: 37 year: 2021
doi: 10.2147/OAJCT.S314030

64. Peer-led Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Enhances Cardiometabolic Markers in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Elizabeth Wanjiru Maina, Samuel Kimani, James Mwaura
INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing vol: 62 year: 2025
doi: 10.1177/00469580251390775

65. Status of Psychological Adjustment and Associated Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Zanjan University of Medical Sciences - 2019
Fatemeh Bahramy, Masoumeh Namadian, Mehran Nezamdiba, zeinab ghahremani
Preventive Care In Nursing and Midwifery Journal vol: 10 issue: 1 first page: 18 year: 2020
doi: 10.52547/pcnm.10.1.18

66. The Effect of Social Support on Treatment Adherence and Self- Efficacy in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Gül DURAL, Ümmühan AKTÜRK
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi vol: 8 issue: 3 first page: 949 year: 2023
doi: 10.61399/ikcusbfd.1192186

67. Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of bio-psychosocial care at the primary healthcare level in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo
Christian E.N. Molima, Hermès Karemere, Ghislain Bisimwa, Samuel Makali, Pacifique Mwene-Batu, Espoir B. Malembaka, Jean Macq
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine vol: 13 issue: 1 year: 2021
doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2608

68. Identifying the key components of social support for patients living with type 2 diabetes: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of type 2 diabetes social support interventions
Reda Madroumi, Lisa Newson, Frederick Kanayo Umeh, Helen Poole, Andrew Jones, Mahmoud M. Werfalli
PLOS ONE vol: 19 issue: 8 first page: e0306709 year: 2024
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306709

69. Development and validation of the Soweto Coping Scale: A mixed-methods, population-based study of adults living in Soweto, South Africa
Feziwe Mpondo, Andrew Wooyoung Kim, Alexander C. Tsai, Emily Mendenhall
Journal of Affective Disorders vol: 303 first page: 353 year: 2022
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.035

70. TİP 2 DİYABETES MELLİTUSLU BİREYLERDE SAĞLIK ALGISI VE AİLE DESTEĞİNİN TEDAVİYE UYUM DÜZEYİNE ETKİSİ
Beyza ÇORAK, Neşe UYSAL
Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi vol: 55 issue: 2 first page: 125 year: 2022
doi: 10.20492/aeahtd.1098831

71. Diabetic health literacy and associated factors among patients with diabetes attending follow-up in public hospitals of Northeastern Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study
Elda Mekonnen Nigussie, Mekasha Getnet Demeke, Tigist Demssew Adane, Bethelehem Taye Mengistu, Abel Tibebu Goshu, Yihenew Ayehu Dessie, Birhan Getye Worku, Eyosiyas Yeshialem Asefa
BMJ Open vol: 14 issue: 10 first page: e084961 year: 2024
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084961

72. Factors predicted quality of life of people with type 2 diabetes in western Ethiopia
Dereje Chala Diriba, Doris Y. P. Leung, Lorna K. P. Suen, María del Carmen Valls Martínez
PLOS ONE vol: 18 issue: 2 first page: e0281716 year: 2023
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281716

73. Factors associated with poor glycemic control among adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Gamo and Gofa zone public hospitals, Southern Ethiopia: A case-control study
Firehiwot Dawite, Meseret Girma, Tamiru Shibiru, Etenesh Kefelew, Tadiwos Hailu, Rodas Temesgen, Getachew Abebe, Innocent Ijezie Chukwuonye
PLOS ONE vol: 18 issue: 3 first page: e0276678 year: 2023
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276678

74. Special Psychosocial Issues in Diabetes Management: Diabetes Distress, Disordered Eating, and Depression
Michael S. Shapiro
Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice vol: 49 issue: 2 first page: 363 year: 2022
doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2021.11.007

75. Exploring the experiences and challenges in managing type 2 diabetes among adults in Harare, Zimbabwe – a grounded theory study
Blessing M. Chirewa, Mathew Nyashanu, Adam Barnard
International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health vol: 13 issue: 2 first page: 639 year: 2026
doi: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20260288

African Online Scientific Information Systems (Pty) Ltd t/a AOSIS
Reg No: 2002/002017/07
International Tel: +27 21 975 2602
5 Hafele Street, Durbanville, Cape Town, 7550, South Africa
publishing(AT)aosis.co.za replace (AT) with @

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
Website design & content: ©2026 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved. No unauthorised duplication allowed.
By continuing to use this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use and Security Policy.

________

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get specific, domain-collection newsletters detailing the latest CPD courses, scholarly research and call-for-papers in your field.

African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | ISSN: 2071-2928 (PRINT) | ISSN: 2071-2936 (ONLINE)

Original Research