Short Report - Special Collection: COVID-19

Turnaround times – the Achilles’ heel of community screening and testing in Cape Town, South Africa: A short report

James D. Porter, Robert Mash, Wolfgang Preiser
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 12, No 1 | a2624 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2624 | © 2020 James D. Porter, Robert Mash, Wolfgang Preiser | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 June 2020 | Published: 02 October 2020

About the author(s)

James D. Porter, Symphony Way CDC, Metro District Health Services, Western Cape Government, Cape Town, South Africa
Robert Mash, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Wolfgang Preiser, Division of Medical Virology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Early in the course of the coronavirus infection disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in South Africa, the Department of Health implemented a policy of community screening and testing (CST). This was based on a community-orientated primary care approach and was a key strategy in limiting the spread of the pandemic, but it struggled with long turnaround times (TATs) for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test. The local experience at Symphony Way Community Day Centre (Delft, Cape Town), highlighted these challenges. The first positive tests had a median TAT of 4.5 days, peaking at 29 days in mid-May 2020. Issues that contributed to long TATs were unavailability of viral transport medium, sample delivery and storage difficulties, staffing problems, scarcity of testing supplies and other samples prioritised over CST samples. At Symphony Way, many patients who tested COVID-19 positive had abandoned their self-isolation because of the delay in results. Employers were unhappy with prolonged sick leave whilst waiting for results and patients were concerned about not getting paid or job loss. The CST policy relies on a rapid TAT to be successful. Once the TAT is delayed, the process of contacting patients, and tracing and quarantining contacts becomes ineffective. With hindsight, other countries’ difficulties in upscaling testing should have served as warning. Community screening and testing was scaled back from 18 May 2020, and testing policy was changed to only include high-risk patients from 29 May 2020. The delayed TATs meant that the CST policy had no beneficial impact at local level.

Keywords

COVID-19; turnaround times; community screening and testing; Cape Town; South Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 334
Total article views: 182


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.