Short Report - Special Collection: COVID-19

‘Self-collected upper respiratory tract swabs for COVID-19 test’: A feasible way to increase overall testing rate and conserve resources in South Africa

Adeloye A. Adeniji
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 12, No 1 | a2445 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2445 | © 2020 Adeloye A. Adeniji | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 April 2020 | Published: 28 May 2020

About the author(s)

Adeloye A. Adeniji, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; and, Ceres Hospital, Cape Winelands Health District, Department of Health, Ceres, South Africa

Abstract

Disparity in the testing rate of SARS-CoV-2 amongst different countries and regions is a very big challenge in understanding the COVID-19 pandemic. Although some developed countries have a very high testing rate and subsequently a high number of confirmed cases, less developed countries have a low testing rate and an illusive positivity rate. Collection of the upper respiratory specimen is not often comfortable. The discomfort could be accompanied with epistaxis and headache in some patients. The trained personnel taking the swab is forced to protect self with personal protective equipment (PPE) to avoid infections that may result from the patient due to provoked cough, sneezing and spitting. This study looks into an efficient means of increasing the testing rate for COVID 19 without compromising the quality. A literature review was conducted on the different modalities of collecting upper respiratory specimens and assessing the efficacy of samples collected using different methods in terms of the laboratory yield of different pathogens. Self-collection of upper respiratory tract specimen for diagnostic purposes is not new. Studies have demonstrated that trained staff-collected nasal swabs are not in any way superior to self-collected or parent-assisted swabs. The laboratory yield of different specimens is not determined by who took the sample but by the anatomical site from where the specimen was collected. Self collection of the upper respiratory swabs will not only increase the testing rate but also preserve the scarce PPE and reduces health care worker’s COVID 19 infection rate in South Africa.

Keywords

nasal; nasopharyngeal; oropharyngeal; South Africa; World Health Organization (WHO); National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD); personal protective equipment (PPE); person under investigation (PUI).

Metrics

Total abstract views: 5646
Total article views: 5240

 

Crossref Citations

1. Recommendations for specimen collection for detection and diagnosis of COVID-19
Juliana Dall'Agnol, Eda Schwartz, Fernanda Lise
ABCS Health Sciences  vol: 46  year: 2021  
doi: 10.7322/abcshs.2020195.1642

2. Assessing the use of minimally invasive self-sampling at home for long-term monitoring of the microbiota within UK families
E. Nikolaou, E. L. German, A. Howard, H. M. Nabwera, A. Matope, R. Robinson, F. Shiham, K. Liatsikos, C. McNamara, S. Kattera, K. Carter, C. M. Parry, J. M. Read, S. J. Allen, B. C. Urban, D. B. Hawcutt, H. Hill, A. M. Collins, D. M. Ferreira
Scientific Reports  vol: 13  issue: 1  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45574-6

3. Capillary whole-blood IgG-IgM COVID-19 self-test as a serological screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection adapted to the general public
Serge Tonen-Wolyec, Raphael Dupont, Salomon Batina-Agasa, Marie-Pierre Hayette, Laurent Bélec, Alan Landay
PLOS ONE  vol: 15  issue: 10  first page: e0240779  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240779

4. Atualização Diagnóstica para a Covid-19
Thalia Fernanda Araújo Costa, Vanessa Fernandes Mendonça, Thalita Grazielly Santos, Karina Maciel Pádua
ID on line. Revista de psicologia  vol: 17  issue: 68  first page: 351  year: 2023  
doi: 10.14295/idonline.v17i68.3828

5. A comparison of swab types on sample adequacy, suspects comfort and provider preference in COVID-19
Vijay Bidkar, Kalaiselvi Selvaraj, Meena Mishra, Vishal Shete, Anita Sajjanar
American Journal of Otolaryngology  vol: 42  issue: 2  first page: 102872  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102872

6. Accuracy of an antigen-detecting SARS-CoV-2 assay with self- and provider-collected specimens interpreted visually and with BD Veritor™ Plus analyzer
Lauren Cooper, Karen Eckert, Joseph Mann, Rossmeri Montalvo, Luis Castillo, Dwan Fellows, Stephen Young
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus  vol: 3  issue: 1  first page: 100140  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2023.100140

7. Chinese herbal medicine treatment in five mild COVID-19 cases: South African case studies
Zijing Hu, Jie Zhang
Complementary Medicine: Education and Research  vol: 1  issue: 1  first page: 30  year: 2023  
doi: 10.62415/RFIX6198

8. Are Kenyans Likely to Use COVID-19 Self-Testing Kits? Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey
Griffins Manguro, Sonjelle Shilton, Sharon Omenda, Patrica Owira, Deepshikha Batheja, Abhik Banerji, Sophie Vusha Chabeda, Marleen Temmerman, Walter Jako, Joseph Ndungu, Stanley Luchters, Elena Ivanova Reipold, Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez
International Journal of Public Health  vol: 67  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604918

9. Innovation in primary health care responses to COVID-19 in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sunanda Ray, Robert Mash
Primary Health Care Research & Development  vol: 22  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000451

10. Preparing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Self-Testing Implementation: Lessons Learned From HIV Self-Testing
Donaldson F. Conserve, Allison Mathews, Augustine T. Choko, LaRon E. Nelson
Frontiers in Medicine  vol: 7  year: 2020  
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.599521

11. Accuracy and Acceptance of a Self-Collection Model for Respiratory Tract Infection Diagnostics: A Concise Clinical Literature Review
Thang T. Nguyen, Wesley G. Zeger, Michael C. Wadman, Aaron N. Barksdale
Journal of Emergency Nursing  vol: 47  issue: 5  first page: 798  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2021.04.006