Original Research
An audit of the screen-and-treat intervention to reduce cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-positive patients with low CD4 count
Submitted: 28 February 2018 | Published: 08 August 2018
About the author(s)
Egide Ndayishimiye, Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Prince Mshiyeni Memorial Hospital, South AfricaAndrew J. Ross, Department of Family Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Abstract
Background: HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis (CCM) and related mortality may be prevented by the effective implementation of a screen-and-treat intervention.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the screen-and-treat intervention at a regional hospital in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.
Method: This was a descriptive study in which the records of patients seen in 2015 and 2016 with a CD4 count ≤ 100 cell/mm3 were retrieved from National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) records and matched against patients admitted for HIV-associated CCM.
Results: A total of 5.1% (190 out of 3702) patients with CD4 count ≤ 100 cell/mm3 were cryptococcal antigen positive (CrAg +ve), of whom 22.6% (43 out of 190) were admitted with CCM. Patients who were CrAg +ve had significantly lower CD4 counts (mean CD4 = 38.9 ± 28.5) when compared to CrAg –ve patients (mean CD4 = 49.9 ± 37.4) with p = 0.0001. Only 2.6% (5 out of 190) of patients were referred for a lumbar puncture (LP) as part of the screen-and-treat intervention, whilst 38 who were CrAg +ve self-presented with CCM. Eighty-eight patients were admitted for suspected CCM: eight because of the screen-and-treat-intervention (none of whom had meningitis based on cerebrospinal fluid results) and 80 of whom self-presented and had confirmed CCM. The overall mortality of patients admitted with CCM was 30% (24 out of 80).
Conclusion: The current ad-hoc screen-and-treat intervention was ineffective in detecting patients at risk of developing CCM. Systems need to be put in place to ensure that all CrAg +ve patients have an LP to detect subclinical CCM to improve the outcome for those with HIV-associated CCM.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 3532Total article views: 5227
Crossref Citations
1. A review of the management and outcome of patients admitted with cryptococcal meningitis at a regional hospital in KwaZulu-Natal province
Andrew J Ross, Egide Ndayishimiye
South African Family Practice vol: 61 issue: 4 first page: 159 year: 2019
doi: 10.1080/20786190.2019.1607480
2. Assessment of two POC technologies for CD4 count in Morocco
Elmir Elharti, Halima Abbadi, Rajae Bensghir, Kamal Marhoum El Filali, Hajar Elmrabet, Hicham Oumzil
AIDS Research and Therapy vol: 17 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.1186/s12981-020-00289-w
3. Cryptococcal meningitis: a review of cryptococcal antigen screening programs in Africa
Greg Greene, David S Lawrence, Alex Jordan, Tom Chiller, Joseph N. Jarvis
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy vol: 19 issue: 2 first page: 233 year: 2021
doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1785871
4. Uptake of lumbar puncture and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease who screened for serum cryptococcal-antigen in Africa
Haji Mbwana Ally, Hafidha Mhando Bakari, Jackline Vicent Mbishi, Zuhura Mbwana Ally, Mariam Salim Mbwana, Lynn Moshi, Rahma Musoke, Swalehe Mustafa Salim, Hassan Fredrick Fussi, Aboubakar Omar Mustafa, John Bartlet, Habib Omari Ramadhani
World Journal of Virology vol: 14 issue: 2 year: 2025
doi: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.106973
5. Surgical treatment and operation time in human immunodeficiency virus-negative cryptococcal meningitis
Jie Zhao, Xiang Zhao, Shaobo Yang, Shuying Miao, Ying Liu
Medicine vol: 99 issue: 42 first page: e22546 year: 2020
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022546

