Original Research

Improving the quality of care for patients with hypertension in Moshupa District, Botswana: Quality improvement cycle

Cathy Kande, Robert Mash
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 6, No 1 | a578 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.578 | © 2014 Cathy Kande, Robert Mash | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 July 2013 | Published: 25 April 2014

About the author(s)

Cathy Kande, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Robert Mash, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Although there are no prevalence studies on hypertension in Botswana, this condition is thought to be common and the quality of care to be poor.

Aim: The aim of this project was to assess and improve the quality of primary care forhypertension.

Setting: Moshupa clinic and catchment area, Botswana.

Methods: Quality improvement cycle.

Results: Two hundred participants were included in the audit. Sixty-eight per cent were women with a mean age of 55 years. In the baseline audit none of the target standards were met. During the re-audit six months later, six out of nine structural target standards, five out of 11 process target standards and one out of two outcome target standards were achieved. Statistically-significant improvement in performance (p < 0.05) was shown in 10 criteria although the target standard was not always met. In the re-audit, the target of achieving blood pressure control (< 140/90) in 70% of patients was achieved.

Conclusion: The quality of care for hypertension was suboptimal in our setting. Simple interventions were designed and implemented to improve the quality of care. These interventions led to significant improvement in structural and process criteria. A corresponding significant improvement in the control of blood pressure was also seen.


Keywords

Hypertension; quality of care; quality improvement; audit; primary care

Metrics

Total abstract views: 10734
Total article views: 13491

 

Crossref Citations

1. Quality indicators for clinical care of patients with hypertension: scoping review protocol
Hanevi Djasri, Sekar Laras, Adi Utarini
BMJ Open  vol: 9  issue: 7  first page: e026167  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026167

2. Quality of hypertension management in public primary care clinics in Malaysia: An update
Xin Rou Teh, Ming Tsuey Lim, Seng Fah Tong, Masliyana Husin, Noraziani Khamis, Sheamini Sivasampu, Anderson Saranz Zago
PLOS ONE  vol: 15  issue: 8  first page: e0237083  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237083

3. Health systems interventions for hypertension management and associated outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review
Samuel Byiringiro, Oluwabunmi Ogungbe, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Khadijat Adeleye, Fred Stephen Sarfo, Cheryl R. Himmelfarb, Julia Robinson
PLOS Global Public Health  vol: 3  issue: 6  first page: e0001794  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001794

4. Adapting and implementing training, guidelines and treatment cards to improve primary care-based hypertension and diabetes management in a fragile context: results of a feasibility study in Sierra Leone
Guanyang Zou, Sophie Witter, Lizzie Caperon, John Walley, Kiran Cheedella, Reynold G. B. Senesi, Haja Ramatulai Wurie
BMC Public Health  vol: 20  issue: 1  year: 2020  
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09263-7

5. Hypertension control: lessons from Malaysia, a upper-middle-income country
Khalid Yusoff, Azlina Razak, Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman, Feisul Mustapha, Martin McKee
Journal of Cardiology & Current Research  vol: 14  issue: 4  first page: 69  year: 2021  
doi: 10.15406/jccr.2021.14.00514

6. Interventions targeting hypertension and diabetes mellitus at community and primary healthcare level in low- and middle-income countries:a scoping review
Jorge César Correia, Sarah Lachat, Grégoire Lagger, François Chappuis, Alain Golay, David Beran
BMC Public Health  vol: 19  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7842-6