Therapeutic Letter

Appropriate glycated haemoglobin testing frequency to monitor patients with type 2 diabetes

Wade Thompson, Tom Perry, Guillaume Grenet, Ken Bassett, Anshula Ambasta
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 18, No 1 | a5614 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5614 | © 2026 Wade Thompson, Tom Perry, Guillaume Grenet, Ken Bassett, Anshula Ambasta | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 May 2026 | Published: 29 September 2026

About the author(s)

Wade Thompson, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Tom Perry, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Guillaume Grenet, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Ken Bassett, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Anshula Ambasta, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is used to monitor glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Glycated haemoglobin represents a 3-month glycaemic average, with the most recent 6 weeks of glycaemia having the greatest influence. Analytical and biological variation introduce imprecision into any single HbA1c, where a result of 7.5% may represent a ‘true’ value between 6.8% and 8.2%. This Therapeutics Letter evaluates the most appropriate interval for monitoring HbA1c in T2DM. Evidence was synthesised from a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) and three large observational studies. In the RCT, 94% of patients monitored every 6 months maintained good glycaemic control compared to 92% of those monitored every 3 months. Observational data indicated that 3-month testing resulted in a clinically unimportant difference in HbA1c compared with 6-month testing. Furthermore, patients tested 2–3 times annually were as likely to achieve personalised goals as those tested four times per year. Testing more than four times annually was associated with a lower probability of achieving targets. For patients with stable T2DM meeting glycaemic goals, monitoring HbA1c every 6 months is as effective as every 3 months and could be contemplated for many patients following a discussion of patient goals and preferences. Frequent testing may be reserved for periods of medication adjustment, changes in health status or when targets are unmet. Reducing testing frequency in stable patients minimises low-value data, reduces the carbon footprint of lab testing and improves patient convenience without compromising clinical outcomes.

Keywords

blood glucose; diabetes mellitus; glycated haemoglobin; physiologic monitoring; HBA1c testing frequency; older people

Metrics

Total abstract views: 369
Total article views: 349


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.