About the Author(s)


Makhotso M. Ralehike Email symbol
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Fhumulani M. Mulaudzi symbol
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Nombulelo V. Sepeng symbol
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Sinethemba Nyandeni symbol
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Citation


Ralehike MM, Mulaudzi FM, Sepeng NV, Nyandeni S. Assessing existing infection prevention and control measures used by nurses in water-scarce healthcare in a global setting: A scoping review. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2026;18(1), a5429. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5429

Review Article

Assessing existing infection prevention and control measures used by nurses in water-scarce healthcare in a global setting: A scoping review

Makhotso M. Ralehike, Fhumulani M. Mulaudzi, Nombulelo V. Sepeng, Sinethemba Nyandeni

Received: 04 Feb. 2026; Accepted: 29 Apr. 2026; Published: 03 July 2026

Copyright: © 2026. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Abstract

Background: Water service in primary healthcare clinics is nearly impossible, especially in remote areas, because of poor infrastructure and ineffective municipal service delivery compliance. The health risk to patient care and safety makes basic cleanliness and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in primary healthcare clinics difficult.

Aim: This study mapped and synthesised the existing Infection Prevention and Control measures used by nurses in water-scarce healthcare facilities in a global setting.

Method: A comprehensive search was conducted in four databases: EBSCOhost, Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE EBSCO Web of Science. Each database search employed algorithm-specific strategies and combinations. Eligible studies were those addressing IPC measures in water-scarce healthcare settings, published in English, between 2020 and 2025, and with accessible full text. Data were extracted using manual tables and thematically analysed.

Results: This review identified 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria from South Asian and African countries. This review employed a descriptive qualitative methodology using thematic analysis to determine and describe the main themes that emerged from the research findings. Four themes emerged: Social behavioural strategies, good governance systems, incorporating digital and technology in healthcare systems and community participation approaches.

Conclusion: This scoping review indicates that water scarcity challenges the IPC standards in healthcare facilities, adversely affecting basic hygiene practices, sanitation and overall cleanliness.

Contribution: Its findings serve as a valuable resource for nurses, stakeholders, and policymakers working to improve IPC measures in primary healthcare clinics experiencing water scarcity.

Keywords: infection prevention and control measures; hygiene practices; nurses; water scarcity; healthcare clinics.

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights that ‘1 in 5 healthcare facilities (22%) lack basic water services, affecting 1.7 billion people, including 857 million people globally who access healthcare facilities with no water at all’.1 According to the WHO and UNICEF, the global report states that water is an essential public health necessity and a core component of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) services in healthcare settings, important for infection prevention and control (IPC).2 The provision of safe, adequate and reliable water supply is important for all healthcare services within a primary health care (PHC) facility.2 Ideally, PHCs are expected to provide acute and emergency services in any circumstance. Services include obstetrics, trauma and emergency care, as well as management of both chronic and acute illnesses.3 Lack of water supply in PHCs disrupts health services and poses a challenge to basic health hygiene.4 Over 40 countries, including Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Bhutan and India, had adopted the WHO strategy to improve IPC in healthcare facilities facing water scarcity,5 the implementation of Water and Sanitation for Health Facility Improvement Tool (WASH FIT) emphasis that water services in healthcare facilities are essential for basic and life-saving IPC practices, such as hand hygiene, safe waste management and cleaning.5 Primary health cares are dependent on a consistent supply of clean water for operational functions, including patient care, sanitation, handwashing and the cleaning or sterilisation of medical equipment.5,6 In the South African Context, the Ideal Clinic Realisation and Maintenance (ICRM) framework considers the availability of clean running water as a fundamental criterion for an ‘ideal’ primary healthcare facility.7 However, clinics without a reliable water supply, particularly in remote areas, are prioritised for infrastructure improvements, including water storage tanks or alternative supply systems like boreholes or Jojo tanks, to ensure adherence to IPC standards and the uninterrupted operation of the clinics.7 However, inadequate maintenance of existing water supply systems and the failure to replace ageing infrastructures render them ineffective. Lack of water supply at PHCs disrupts services and patient care, posing challenges associated with infection in the healthcare facilities. Patients with communicable diseases are likely to be overlooked and remain untreated because of clinic closures or restricted operational hours resulting from water outrages and insufficient water supplies in the healthcare facilities. This practice has been implemented as a measure to minimise transmission of infection as a result of unhygienic conditions and poor handwash practices.4 The health complications of transmissible diseases can lead to epidemics and impose burdens on the healthcare system.4 The literature indicated several outbreaks in healthcare facilities experiencing water scarcity because of an unhygienic clinical environment and inadequate hygiene practices, which exposed both patients and nurses to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) resulting from insufficient handwashing and general cleanliness in clinical settings.4 Water scarcity in healthcare facilities is an important contributor to poor-quality care and compromised basic IPC practices, as nurses are unable to adequately wash their hands, sanitise medical equipment, thoroughly clean surfaces such as examination beds or maternity tables during childbirth, and respond effectively to emergency procedures.4,8 Water scarcity critically impacts the health of both patients and nurses, typically posing a threat to public health. In many countries, including South Asian and African nations, water scarcity may result from extreme weather events and natural disasters such as droughts,9 pipe obstructions caused by chlorine in water, infrastructural degradation because of insufficient maintenance or vandalism of structures and power outages or load-shedding affecting the pumping of water from surface or underground sources.9,10 The failure of these systems restricts nurses from practising basic IPC practices in patient care as a result of insufficient water supply in PHCs.10 Water scarcity is an alarming global issue and the biggest challenge worldwide.11 Areas significantly impacted include India, the Middle East and countries in sub-Saharan Africa.11 During disease outbreaks, these countries had challenges in curbing infections and burdened health systems because of a lack of water in healthcare facilities to maintain hygiene standards.11,12 In reality, nurses become desperate to provide care, find themselves compelled to work in such unhygienic circumstances, resulting in them resorting to their own improvised measures, including replacing running water and handwash basins with baskets for handwashing, avoiding touching patients for physical examinations to minimise handwashing because of dry taps. Handwashing is effective in curbing infectious diseases.13 For instance, outbreaks of Ebola and Marburg virus in multiple countries also highlighted that health systems are underprepared and unable to respond to disease outbreaks as a result of limited access to water services and handwash facilities, a critical component of IPC during disease outbreaks.13 In dealing with outbreaks, WHO stated that the provision of clean water, sanitation and hygienic conditions are critical to protect human health during infectious disease outbreaks.14,15

Despite substantial advances in healthcare systems, 23 countries, mainly in Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean, continue to report high case fatality rates from cholera outbreaks, which are primarily because of inadequate water supply.7,13,14,15 Case fatality rates often exceeded the WHO-recommended threshold of < 1%, indicating systemic deficiencies in outbreak response and healthcare delivery.14 Contributing factors include poor IPC measures, inadequate handwashing facilities resulting from limited access to clean water.14,15 Efficient IPC is important for preventing HAIs and is an essential part of safe, effective, high-quality healthcare service delivery. A lack of water supply in primary healthcare clinics, particularly in remote areas, has far-reaching consequences, impacting the quality of patient care and contributing to increased death rates in various facets of nursing care.16 As a result, nurses are obligated to change or stop procedures in the absence of water, which directly impacts patient outcomes and safety. This means the unavailability of functional hand hygiene stations and non-adherence with hand hygiene practices because of dry taps adversely affect the health of patients. Delayed patient care, substandard sterile procedures for wound techniques and childbirth procedures will subject patients to infections resulting from unsterile practices, including inadequate hand washing and unhygienic clinical settings.15,16 Therefore, this review aimed to map and synthesise the existing IPC measures used by nurses in water-scarce healthcare clinics in a global setting.

Methods

Study design

This study applied a scoping review approach, which is a proven method for synthesising existing literature on a particular topic, emphasising key ideas or characteristics within the literature and identifying knowledge gaps.17,18 It employs the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework to analyse the literature that has been relatively overlooked in existing research.19 The approach was revised by Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien.16 This study explored the wide range of published literature on existing IPC measures used by nurses working in primary healthcare clinics facing water scarcity around the globe. A scoping review comprises five stages: Stage 1 – Formulating the research question, Stage 2 – Identifying relevant studies, Stage 3 – Selecting appropriate studies, Stage 4 – Extracting relevant data and Stage 5 – Reporting or synthesising results.17,18

Research question

The research topic was: ‘What are the existing IPC measures used by nurses working in primary healthcare clinics facing water scarcity around the globe?’

Search strategy and eligibility criteria

This study used PCC’s framework for literature review, where P-Population comprised nurses in primary healthcare clinics; C-Content referred to IPC measures and C-Context referred to water scarcity. The search was conducted in English. The keywords used to search for articles were ‘Infection Prevention and Control measures, nurses, water-scarcity, healthcare clinics’. Four electronic databases were used for the literature search: EBSCOhost, Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE EBSCO and Web of Science. Each database search used different search strategies and combinations tailored for each algorithm. Filters and limitations, particularly restrictions on publication dates, articles published within 5 years period were used. A brief overview of string search is presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Search strategy based on alternative keywords.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria

This scoping review considered PCC (Populations, Concept, Context) to establish its inclusion and exclusion criteria, ensuring alignment with its research question. The study population included nurses in primary healthcare clinics. This study also incorporated selected peer-reviewed grey literature in the review, such as published dissertations, international organisational reports and guidelines on existing IPC measures for nurses in healthcare facilities with water scarcity. The focus ensured that the study reviewed all available literature without limiting the scope of the search or the literature itself. The search included published literature from 2020 to 2025 in the four databases. The articles were written in English, which is the language of scientific communication and writing. The aim was to assess the existing IPC measures for nurses in healthcare facilities with water scarcity across the globe. Studies were omitted if they did not relate to PCC or if the full text was inaccessible. Any publication before the year 2020 was excluded. If strategies did not address nurses in healthcare facilities experiencing water scarcity. No complete texts are accessible in English. Additional kinds of studies that were not peer reviewed include newspapers, letters, grey literature and editorials. The eligible articles were downloaded and imported into Endnote software to verify their eligibility for the screening procedure. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram in Figure 1 shows the process of article inclusion and exclusion.20 The initial search strategy identified 250 reports obtained from online databases. Upon the removal of 106 articles, 144 articles remained. The reviewers screened 41 articles for titles that did not correspond with the research topic and were excluded. Of the 103 articles, 62 failed to meet the eligibility requirements. After an extensive review of the remaining 41 articles, a further 29 were excluded because of inadequate discussion on IPC measures for nurses in primary healthcare clinics with water scarcity. Consequently, 12 articles were incorporated into the final study. All studies were written in English. All 12 included studies explored ways for addressing water scarcity across various healthcare settings in primary healthcare clinics in different countries experiencing water scarcity.

FIGURE 1: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses flow diagram.

Data extraction

The data were manually tabulated in Microsoft Windows to show the findings of the scoping review regarding the specific characteristics of the studies. The following characteristics have been highlighted in Table 1: Author’s name, publication year, title of the study, country of research, the aim of the study, study population and findings or suggested strategies. The data screening was conducted by two reviewers to minimise bias. In the event there was no consensus, a third independent reviewer was engaged to draw a conclusion. This ensured the rigorousness of this review.

Data analysis

This review employed a descriptive qualitative methodology using thematic analysis to determine and describe the main themes that emerged from the research findings. The two reviewers agreed on the themes that were developed. These themes were developed based on the findings of the exploration of current strategies for nurses working in primary healthcare clinics facing water scarcity. The reviewers maintained clear and transparent communication to reduce subjective biases. These measures strengthened the credibility, reliability and confirmability of the thematic analysis in this study.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from the University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Science Research Ethics Committee (No. 568/2025).

Review findings

Of the twelve (n = 12) articles that were reviewed, see Table 2 for the details of the included articles. The studies were conducted in different countries around the globe, two in Ethopia,21,22 three (n = 3) in Nigeria,23,24,25 two (n = 2) South Asian countries,26,27 one (n = 1) India,28 one (n = 1) in different countries including Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Chad, Guatemala, Guinea, Liberia, Malawi and Nigeria,24 One (n = 1) Pakistan,29 two (n = 2) South Africa30,31 and one (n = 1) in European countries.32 Four themes emerged from the scoping review: Social behavioural strategies, good governance systems, integrating digital and technology in healthcare systems and community participation approach.

TABLE 2: Summary of included studies.
TABLE 2 (Continues…): Summary of included studies.
TABLE 2 (Continues…): Summary of included studies.
Theme 1: Social behavioural strategies
Sub-theme 1.1: Hand hygiene practices

Hand hygiene is considered the most effective IPC measure and is endorsed by several countries as a critical standard of care. The first article, conducted in Asia, indicated that the implementation of hygiene practices, particularly emphasising the need for hand hygiene for nurses, may be enhanced by providing resources such as soap and running water.32 In the absence of water availability, the study conducted by Luby and colleagues suggested that the use of soapy water made from low-cost detergents or any other inexpensive approaches should be used in Asia for basic hand hygiene.27 In contrast, several studies found that regular use of handrub steriliser is utilised in European nations and Ethiopia to maintain hand hygiene standards.21,22,32 Countries, including Liberia and Malawi, emphasised the significance of handwashing stations in the healthcare facilities to ensure good hygiene.24

Sub-theme 1.2: Hygiene champions

Hygiene champion is a strategy to encourage the compliance of hygiene practices, such as handwashing and cleaning quality, to improve prevention of infection and raise safety standards. Nurses nominate one of their colleagues in healthcare facilities to act as a hygiene champion to serve as a leader and trainer to oversee the hygiene compliance. In support of these findings, the study conducted by Berman and colleagues suggested that in Ethiopia, nurses volunteer to be IPC champions to improve handwashing and general cleanliness compliance.

Sub-theme 1.3: Knowledge empowerment

Several studies conducted in nations including Ethiopia, Guatemala and Guinea emphasised the importance of training nurses, patients and the community on hygiene as a measure to improve IPC in healthcare facilities experiencing water scarcity.21,22 In support of these findings, the study conducted by Gebremicael et al., in Ethiopia, indicated that knowledge exchange has been beneficial for hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities that have a water shortage.21

Theme 2: Good governance systems
Sub-theme 2.1: Water sources and systems

Uninterrupted water supply is suggested in a number of studies as significant to ensure IPC is improved in healthcare facilities. The study conducted in India by Kumar and others suggested that the maintenance of infrastructures.28 Similarly, in Nigeria, the study emphasised the implementation of water infrastructure, including boreholes and rainwater harvesting systems, to mitigate IPC standards in healthcare facilities.25

Additionally, the study conducted in Asia suggested the availability of funds to support municipalities for the maintenance and repair of water suppliers to ensure water is available in the facilities.36 In support of this finding, the study conducted in South Africa recommends the fixation of leaking taps and the use of water-efficient appliances to promote water supply.31

Theme 3: Integrating digital and technology in the health system

The majority of countries incorporated technology into healthcare systems for evaluation and monitoring purposes. In certain regions of South Africa, including the Cape Town province, given that electricity is a challenge in South Africa, the utilisation of solar power serves as a contingency for water delivery, ensuring that PHCs continue to have a supply of water.31 Similar to that, countries such as Pakistan, Nigeria and Bangladesh have implemented telemedicine systems and digital platforms like e-health and mHealth audio messaging to enhance healthcare services and minimise clinic visits.26,24,29,25 In several countries, including Burkina Faso, Chad, Guatemala, Guinea, Liberia and Malawi, patients obtain multiple services within a single clinic visit, utilise innovative medication dispensing systems for stable patients, thereby implementing methods to enhance access to health services in facilities experiencing water scarcity.24

Furthermore, the study conducted in South Africa suggested the implementation of technology such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) devices to monitor water supply in healthcare facilities, as a measure to ensure that water taps are programmed to dispense clean water during handwashing.31

Theme 4: Community participation approach

Several nations in South Asia and South Africa emphasised the importance of community engagement and collaboration with external sub-sectoral stakeholders in water access strategies to address compromised IPC measures in healthcare facilities experiencing water scarcity.26,30,31 Five South Asian countries, including Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, have redirected healthcare services to the community by implementing outreach programmes.26 These initiatives include home-based care visits, mobile clinics for remote regions and the implementation of Community Healthcare Workers (CHW) programmes for routine screenings and follow-ups, aimed at alleviating the burden on the healthcare system during water shortages.26 This is a key measure for controlling infections acquired in medical facilities during periods of water constraint. In particular contexts, notably in Bangladesh and India, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are supporting programmes related to maternal and child health in specific regions.26,28 In Nigeria, it has been suggested that community health committees, as part of the PHC team, would serve as a representative voice for both nurses and the community in enforcing IPC standards in healthcare facilities experiencing water scarcity.25 The health committee will engage communities in decision-making, encourage their participation in PHC and water governance structures to strengthen the provision of public PHC services and improve quality care.25 These studies collectively highlighted existing IPC practices that nurses in healthcare facilities experiencing water scarcity globally might adopt to provide quality patient care to ensure the continuation of care.

Discussion of findings

This section presents a discussion of the main findings from the literature review, arranged into four themes: social behavioural strategies, good governance systems, incorporating digital and technology in healthcare systems and community participation approaches.

Theme 1: Social behavioural strategies

The results of this review revealed that adopting social behavioural strategies such as consistent hand hygiene practices, selecting hygiene champions and knowledge empowerment of nurses would ensure safe practices and prevent infection in healthcare clinics facing water scarcity. This finding supports nurse’s innovative approaches to maintain safe practices despite the limited availability of water. In Germany, these automated dispensers had shown a reduction in contamination and an improvement in hand hygiene in water-scarce healthcare facilities.33 Similarly, in the United States, sensor-based water taps have been introduced to minimise water flow and waste. These smart water management systems have facilitated better leakage detection and contribute to water conservation. In addition, the use of alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHR) should be prioritised as the primary method for hand hygiene when hands are not visibly soiled.33,34 as it is effective in killing microbes that cause infection. The installation of these touch-free ABHR dispensers should be strategically placed in points of care, including bedside, procedure rooms, consulting rooms and reception or entrance areas, to improve compliance. Ensuring that nurses are adequately skilled and trained in innovative practices would promote effective IPC measures in primary healthcare facilities.

Theme 2: Good governance systems

The findings of this review indicated that water supply must be readily available and accessible in healthcare facilities, particularly in remote PHCs, as they are often the sole healthcare providers in the areas they serve.4 In support of these findings, to ensure improved IPC measures, water supply to healthcare facilities should be facilitated in communities through reliable funding to pay water suppliers and empowering a well-coordinated and effective local authority to manage water services.25,28 This study was supported by studies conducted in many countries experiencing water scarcity, including Nigeria, South Africa and Nepal, where the nurses in healthcare facilities depend on water supply sources such as boreholes, communal tanks yard taps, rainwater harvesting systems (JoJo tanks) (Figure 2) and water tankers during water shortages to sustain operations; these adaptive measures should be preserved.25,27,31 Ensuring clean running water in healthcare is a public good,1,2,3 and in the event of a water outage, the local municipality should intervene to supply water to PHCs.27

FIGURE 2: Jojo tank connected with a tap.35

Furthermore, even though nurses rely on the availability of water to ensure good hand hygiene and general cleanliness of the clinic, the feasibility of access to water relies on municipalities getting professional skills in managing the finances of water systems by generating revenue. This might assist in facilitating regular maintenance, infrastructural advancements and productivity improvements in clinics, which will guarantee a continuous water supply for quality patient care.24,28,30 Based on the findings in this review, the researcher believes that in some regions where water shortage is both irreversible and progressive, municipalities must consistently refill communal tanks, particularly at healthcare facilities in remote areas. No clinic or PHC should be closed as a result of poor governance of its water services. On the other hand, this review is in support of the importance of maintaining water-related infrastructure to ensure consistent access to clean running water in healthcare facilities. Similarly, the study conducted by Sharma and colleagues and Iversen and others states that regular maintenance and checking of water storage containers, repair of leaking taps and timely restoration of water supply pipelines and systems will all ensure a reliable water supply.36,37 In support of this claim, this review discovered that upgrading ageing infrastructures and installing backup water sources in healthcare facilities will protect emergency water storage from contamination. These measures will ensure access to clean water and ensure that IPC standards are maintained in healthcare facilities.

Theme 3: Integrating digital and technology in the health system

Integrating technology into healthcare is important, particularly in this era of water scarcity. The implementation of tippy taps (Figure 3), which are low-flow taps, regulates water flow to minimise waste.38 This strategy is adopted in several countries to improve handwashing. Tippy taps were approved by UNICEF and WaterAid in Uganda and are extensively used in India, Mozambique, Tanzania and Zambia.38 The implementation of this handwashing approach enhances hand hygiene in regions experiencing water constraints. A study conducted in African nations, including Mozambique and Zambia, indicates that this locally made water-saving handwashing device is easy to use and cost-effective.38 The introduction of other devices, including automated or manually controlled foot-operated or elbow-operated taps, will help minimise water waste. Although automated is a costly alternative that may be unfeasible for many facilities because of its electricity demands and complex design.39 Additionally, Pakistan uses a manual foot-elbow-operated handwashing system, which is more feasible for the majority of healthcare facilities in the country.39 In contrast, these measures are mostly influenced by cultural practices, technologies and advancements. For instance, most Western countries, including the United States, Europe and Australia, have introduced water-conserving sanitation technologies, such as bio-digesters or low-flush toilets, commonly referred to as ‘e-toilets’, which require less maintenance than traditional models.40 These measures are meant to promote effective IPC practices in healthcare facilities experiencing water scarcity in developed countries. In comparison to some Asian countries, traditional toilet practices frequently employ manual cleaning methods, such as the use of buckets, as a means to conserve water in both rural and urban areas.39,40 Healthcare clinics need a continuous and uninterrupted energy supply to maintain the operation of water sources, such as pressure pumps, important for delivering health services.36 The switch to renewable energy sources, such as solar, thermal and hydroelectric energy, in developing nations like China, Europe, Japan and the United States, seems to be the most feasible approach to ensure standardised IPC in healthcare facilities facing water scarcity.28,41 Water supply in PHCs is important in achieving global environmental and WASH sustainability. The introduction of solar-powered portable handwashing stations in Nigeria provides more effective hand hygiene solutions for healthcare facilities that experience water scarcity.42 This system allows touchless handwashing in public areas, utilising sensors to automatically dispense soap, water and even allow hand drying (Figure 3).42 This approach would ensure proper hand hygiene in PHCs experiencing water scarcity while also reducing overall water consumption.

FIGURE 3: Artificial intelligence sensor tap.43

Minimising the number of patients physically attending the PHCs reduces water consumption. In support of this, South Asian nations, particularly Pakistan, have implemented telemedicine and digital routine screening systems.44 This remote technology facilitates follow-up care and counselling.44 Similarly, in developed countries, including the United States, patients receive their monthly chronic medication from retailers affiliated with local health departments.44 These initiatives, supported by active community engagement, assist in minimising patient exposure to HAIs resulting from insufficient IPC practices because of a lack of water at the facilities.

Theme 4: Community participation approach

Community involvement in water projects is essential.20,26,28 Number of studies support that community stakeholders must collaborate with planners at all levels of water project planning.29,41 In this review, the researcher is of the view that involving nurses in strategic development is essential; this joint decision will ensure their commitment. Furthermore, this participatory decision-making demonstrated that nurses would appreciate these strategies and show support for implementing the interventions to ensure standardised IPC practises are in place.26,28 The findings indicate that the conditions might improve throughout the preparation and implementation of these IPC measures in healthcare facilities, if implementing authorities engage communities in the provision of water services, allowing community members, particularly nurses, to express their ideas on their preferred water strategies.23,29,41 Hence, certain water sources may be ineffective for some facilities while being beneficial for others. Nurses and other community members should be engaged in all levels of decision-making to promote participation and community governance.26,28,24 Literature indicates that the inclusion of end-user participation is essential during the planning and development of water access projects.23 Consequently, they will be able to advise on the most effective strategies to be applied in their community, particularly with water strategies to address IPC. The collaborative sharing of ideas and knowledge strengthens the relationship between water management providers and the end user, namely nurses in PHCs.23 Additionally, different government departments should collaborate with other sectors to ensure primary healthcare clinics have access to a reliable and sustainable water supply for patient care and IPC practices.26,28,29 Primary healthcare in numerous lower- and middle-income nations, including those in Sub-Saharan Africa, such as Ethiopia, Uganda and Niger, as well as Asian countries like Nepal and Madagascar, relies on critical interventions from water aid organisations from the World Bank for water supply. Several studies indicate that community engagement promotes accountability and sustainability in addressing water scarcity and IPC in healthcare facilities.21,22,28,24 Community awareness and education can significantly contribute to water conservation practices.25 Collaboration with local municipalities, NGOs and community leaders to support rainwater harvesting around the health facilities, as well as the installation of communal water stations, preferably located close to the healthcare facility, will help strengthen community-driven solutions to water scarcity.25 Building on this collaborative approach, community volunteer initiatives to support PHCs are implemented in countries such as Nigeria, where trained volunteers provide basic health services within communities, including home visits for palliative and chronically ill patients.25,45 This approach helps reduce unnecessary clinic attendance for routine follow-ups, thereby lowering the strain on limited water resources. In addition, this review suggests that communities can also be encouraged to create low-cost hand hygiene solutions, such as tippy taps (Figure 4 and Figure 5) or handwashing buckets, to support the PHCs in maintaining proper hand hygiene during periods of water scarcity.

FIGURE 4: UNICEF’s Tippy Tap handwash demonstration guide.

FIGURE 5: Tippy taps handwash station.47

Water scarcity presents a significant IPC challenge for healthcare facilities, particularly PHCs in many countries, including those in Asia, Nepal, India and South Africa. Nurses, in collaboration with communities and other stakeholders, can help minimise health risks through adaptable hand hygiene practices, ensuring proper maintenance of infrastructure, integrating suitable technologies and engaging community support.

Implications and recommendations

This study supports the findings of the reviewed literature, indicating the vital role of community engagement in strengthening IPC measures for nurses working in PHCs experiencing water scarcity around the globe. The introduction of water-saving devices can improve hand hygiene in healthcare facilities with water constraints globally. These solutions include tippy taps, handwashing buckets, alcohol-based hand rub dispensers, automated and manual foot- and elbow-operated handwashing systems, along with various other behavioural strategies to address hygiene in PHCs facing water scarcity. Incorporating suitable technology can further support hand hygiene, sanitation and general cleanliness of the clinics, helping maintain safe and standardised IPC practices during periods of water scarcity. This review strongly recommends the development of strategies to guide infection prevention and control policy for nurses in water-scarce healthcare facilities

Limitations

This study reviewed articles from various countries globally, highlighting a cross-knowledge gap on this topic for the period of 5 years. The limitation of the study is that its findings were focused on primary healthcare settings; therefore, its findings cannot be generalised to a broader population. Although the conclusions are not generalised, they can be used in other contexts to improve the implementation of IPC during periods of water scarcity.

Conclusion

Infection prevention and control standards are compromised when healthcare facilities are experiencing water scarcity, impacting the quality-of-care nurses render. Incorporating behavioural strategies such as health education might improve knowledge on hygiene practices in settings where there is water scarcity for both nurses and patients. The support of healthcare technologies in nursing will enhance patient care and improve hygiene practices in regions where water scarcity is a challenge. This review highlights the significance of participatory action with nurses and the community when addressing issues such as IPC in the context of water scarcity.

Acknowledgements

This article is based on research originally conducted as part of Makhotso M. Ralehike’s doctoral thesis partial fulfilment requirements, titled ‘Strategies to guide infection prevention and control policy for nurses in water-scarce healthcare facilities in the Free State province, South Africa’, and is still ongoing at the Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pretoria in 2026. The thesis is under the supervision of F.M. Mulaudzi, N.V. Sepeng, and S. Nyandeni. The thesis is reworked, revised, and adapted into a journal article for publication. The original thesis will be available online after completion.

Competing interests

The author reported that they received funding from the National Research Foundation (NRF) and the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), which may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed publication. The author Makhotso M. Ralehike has disclosed those interests fully and has implemented an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts arising from their involvement. The terms of these funding arrangements have been reviewed and approved by the affiliated university in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.

CRediT authorship contribution

Makhotso M. Ralehike: Writing – original draft. Fhumulani M. Mulaudzi: Supervision; Writing – review & editing. Nombulelo V. Sepeng: Supervision; Writing – review & editing. Sinethemba Nyandeni: Supervision; Writing – review & editing. All authors reviewed the article, contributed to the discussion of results, approved the final version for submission and publication and take responsibility for the integrity of its findings.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (grant number: SARCCI190531440620-PR-2025) and the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Clinician Researcher Development Programme (Ref: June 2025 RFA).

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. It does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s results, findings and content.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO) & UNICEF. Progress on WASH in health care facilities 2000–2021: Special focus on WASH and infection prevention and control (IPC) [homepage on the Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 16]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/366657
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Drinking-Water [homepage on the Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 16]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drinking-water
  3. World Health Organization. Progress on WASH in health care facilities 2000–2021: Special focus on WASH and infection prevention and control (Global report) [homepage on the Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240058699
  4. Berihun G, Adane M, Walle Z, et al. Access to and challenges in water, sanitation, and hygiene in healthcare facilities during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia: A mixed-methods evaluation. PLoS one. 2022;17(5):e0268272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268272
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Water and sanitation for health facility improvement tool (WASH FIT): A practical guide for improving quality of care through water, sanitation and hygiene in health care facilities [homepage on the Internet]. 2nd ed. 2022 [cited 2025 Sep 18]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/353411
  6. World Health Organization (WHO) & UNICEF. Water, sanitation, hygiene, waste and electricity services in health care facilities: Progress on the fundamentals [homepage on the Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Sep 18]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/f11714c7-65ec-4328-a454-cda91ba0a084/content
  7. The Ideal Clinic Realisation and Maintenance (ICRM) Framework. Ideal clinic and community health centre Tm definitions, components and checklists [homepage on the Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 01]. Available from: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Ideal%20Clinic%20Realisation%20and%20Maintenance%20(ICRM)%20framework&form=SWAUA2
  8. WaterAid Uganda country programme strategy 2023–2028 [homepage on the Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 May 19]. Available from: https://www.wateraid.org/washmatters/our-work/health
  9. Mahato A, Upadhyay S, Sharma D. Global water scarcity due to climate change and its conservation strategies with special reference to India: A review. Plant Arch. 2022;22(1):64–69. https://doi.org/10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2022.v22.no1.009
  10. Jiyane MP, Khunou SH. Experiences of professional nurses regarding shortage of resources at a tertiary hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa: Qualitative study. Jurnal Ners. 2023;18(2):176–183. https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v18i2.44792
  11. WHO and UNICEF. WASH in health care facilities 2023 data update: Special focus on primary health care. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) [homepage on the Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/jmp-wash-in-health-care-facilities-2024/
  12. Adom R. Analysis of public policies and programmes to water security in post-apartheid South Africa. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand; 2020.
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Cholera: Global situation [homepage on the Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Oct 01]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2023-DON437
  14. Ogunniyi TJ, Muoneke AP, Nimo F, Yisa SS, Olorunfemi OA. Cholera in Nigeria: A five-decade review of outbreak dynamics and health system responses. J Health Popul Nutr. 2025;44(1):329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-01096-7
  15. Challa JM, Getachew T, Debella A, et al. Inadequate hand washing, lack of clean drinking water and latrines as major determinants of cholera outbreak in Somali region, Ethiopia in 2019. Front Public Health. 2022;10:845057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.845057
  16. Malematja DN, Nkosi EM, Nene SE. The impact of insufficient resources on the quality-of-service delivery at a primary healthcare clinic in Limpopo. Curationis. 2025;48(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2696
  17. Bitomsky L, Pfitzer EC, Nißen M, Kowatsch T. Advancing health equity and the role of digital health technologies: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2024;14(10):e082336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082336
  18. Yosep I, Mardhiyah A, Hazmi H. et al. A scoping review of nursing interventions for reducing the negative impacts of domestic violence among women. BMC Nurs. 2024;23:834. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02453-3
  19. Arksey H, O’malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
  21. Gebremicael MN, Skaletz-Rorowski A, Potthoff A, et al. Implementing a multimodal intervention using local resources to improve hand hygiene compliance in a comprehensive specialized hospital in Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2024;259:114389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114389
  22. Berman LR, Lang A, Gelana B, et al. Current practices and evaluation of barriers and facilitators to surgical site infection prevention measures in Jimma, Ethiopia. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2021;1(1):e51. https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.227
  23. Ugbah RN. The efficacy of a community participatory process for improving access to water through the sustainability of water development projects: A case study of Okada community, Edo State Nigeria [Doctoral dissertation]. Glasgow Caledonian University; 2022.
  24. Peters MA, Ahmed T, Azais V, et al. Resilience of front-line facilities during COVID-19: Evidence from cross-sectional rapid surveys in eight low-and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2023;38(7):789–798. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad032
  25. Uchenna AO, Elohor A. Scarcity of quality water supply as a facility management challenge in primary health care centres in Nigeria: A case study of Anambra State. IRE J. 2025;8(12):1594–1608.
  26. Perera S, Ramani S, Joarder T, et al. Reorienting health systems towards primary health care in South Asia. Lancet Reg Health-Southeast Asia. 2024;28:100466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100466
  27. Luby SP, Davis J, Brown RR, Gorelick SM, Wong TH. Broad approaches to cholera control in Asia: Water, sanitation and handwashing. Vaccine. 2020;38:A110–A117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.084
  28. Kumar JS, Shobana D. A study on assessment of rural health care system in India: Schemes and implications. Economics. 2024;12(2):24–34. https://doi.org/10.34293/economics.v12i2.7166
  29. Khattak AF, Rahman AU, Khattak M, et al. Toward sustainable healthcare systems: A low and middle-income Country’s case for investing in healthcare reforms. Cureus. 2023;15(5):e39345. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39345
  30. Hove J, D’Ambruoso L, Kahn K, et al. Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: A narrative review. Glob Health Action. 2022;15(1):2004730. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.2004730
  31. Matimolane S, Mathivha FI. Tackling rural water scarcity in South Africa: Climate change, governance, and sustainability pathways. Front Environ Sci. 2025;13:1550738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1550738
  32. Shahtaghi NR, Bigdelitabar S, Thakur S, et al. Comparative antibacterial efficacy of formulated and commercial hand sanitizers: Formulation and evaluation. J Adv Zool. 2023;44(S3):839–850. https://doi.org/10.17762/jaz.v44iS-3.812
  33. Reed M, Huang J, Graetz I, Muelly E, Millman A, Lee C. Treatment and follow-up care associated with patient-scheduled primary care telemedicine and in-person visits in a large integrated health system. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(11):e2132793. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32793
  34. Dick A, Sterr CM, Dapper L, Nonnenmacher-Winter C, Günther F. Tailored positioning and number of hand rub dispensers: The fundamentals for optimized hand hygiene compliance. J Hosp Infect. 2023;141:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2023.08.017
  35. Leroy M. Jojo Tank Slimline Water Tank Green 750 Litre [homepage on the Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Apr 18]. Available from: https://leroymerlin.co.za/jojo-tank-slimline-water-tank-green-750-litre-81464682
  36. Mulopo C, Chimbari MJ. Water, sanitation, and hygiene for schistosomiasis prevention: A qualitative analysis of experiences of stakeholders in rural KwaZulu-Natal. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2021;11(2):255–270. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2021.182
  37. Iversen AM, Hansen MB, Münster M, Kristensen B, Ellermann-Eriksen S. Hand hygiene compliance in nursing home wards: The effect of increased accessibility of alcohol-based hand rub. J Hosp Infect. 2024;147:206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.02.027
  38. Olatunde TM, Adelani FA, Sikhakhane ZQ. A review of smart water management systems from Africa and the United States. Eng Sci Technol J. 2024;5(4):1231–1242. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i4.1014
  39. Mbakaya BC, Kalembo FW, Zgambo M. Use, adoption, and effectiveness of tippy-tap handwashing station in promoting hand hygiene practices in resource-limited settings: A systematic review. BMCPublic Health. 2020;20(1):1005. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09101-w
  40. Sarwar S, Muhammad J, Shahzad F. A modified hand-washing method for resource limited settings. Front Public Health. 2022;10:965853. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.965853
  41. Sharma L, Singh J, Dhiman R, et al. Advancing solar energy for primary healthcare in developing nations: Addressing current challenges and enabling progress through UNICEF and collaborative partnerships. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e51571. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51571
  42. Narone O. Sewage treatment of self sustainable e-toilets using bio-digester method. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2022;10(6):4408–4414. https://doi.org/v10.22214/ijraset.2022.44904
  43. Zweibruecken Fashion Outlet [homepage on the Internet]. AI Sensor Tap. 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 03]. Available from: https://www.idealstandard.co.uk/expertise/case-studies/zweibruecken-fashion-outlet
  44. Animashaun LA, Yekinni AA, Adigun MA, Akhiwolo C, Osinoiki AA. Development and prototyping of sensor-based touchless handwashing and drying system. Laspotech J Sci Eng Technol Res. 2023;2(1):41–53.
  45. Lin JC, Kavousi Y, Sullivan B, Stevens C. Analysis of outpatient telemedicine reimbursement in an integrated healthcare system. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;65:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.069
  46. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Tippy tap handwashing station [homepage on the Internet]. UNICEF; 2021 [cited 2026 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/southafrica/sites/unicef.org.southafrica/files/styles/hero_extended/public/ZAF-Tippy-Tap-field-guide-2020.jpg.webp?itok=JzdCUt_q
  47. United Nations South Africa. Tippy Tap Handwashing Station: People-powered #TippyTapChallenge relaunched to help curb the spread of COVID-19 through handwashing [homepage on the Internet]. 2021 [cited 2026 Apr 18]. Available from: https://southafrica.un.org/sites/default/files/styles/hero_header_2xl_1x/public/2021-03/unicef_tippytap_23march.jpg?itok=RROVhmw0


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.