Short Reports - Special Collection: Primary Care Research Methods
From separate streams to confluence: A framework for meaningful mixed methods integration in African primary care research
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 17, No 2 | a5201 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i2.5201
| © 2025 Robin E. Dyers, Kéfilath Bello, Timothy C. Guetterman
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 August 2025 | Published: 24 November 2025
Submitted: 31 August 2025 | Published: 24 November 2025
About the author(s)
Robin E. Dyers, Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa; WHO-FIC Collaborating Centre, Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; and Department of Health and Wellness, Western Cape Government, Cape Town, South AfricaKéfilath Bello, Centre for Research in Human Reproduction and Demography, Cotonou, Benin
Timothy C. Guetterman, Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
Abstract
Mixed methods research is becoming more common in African primary care studies, yet systematic reviews show most mixed methods studies demonstrate low methodological rigour in integrating qualitative and quantitative components. This integration failure undermines addressing complex health challenges facing African primary care systems, where medical pluralism, resource constraints, and diverse disease burdens demand sophisticated methodological synthesis. This article describes a framework for achieving meaningful mixed methods integration in African primary care research contexts, addressing key challenges and providing practical strategies for transformative synthesis. Drawing on recent methodological advances, including the Mixed Methods Integration Quality Framework, systematic reviews of African mixed methods studies, and exemplar cases from primary care research, the framework integrates theoretical foundations with practical applications in resource-constrained settings. The framework encompasses: temporal considerations for integration decisions; identification of interface points; practical strategies including joint displays and data transformation; team-based approaches to synthesis; and solutions to common integration pitfalls. It addresses epistemological tensions, institutional barriers, and resource constraints in African research contexts. The framework enables researchers to move from separate methodological streams to genuine confluence, generating transformative insights transcending individual methodological contributions. By addressing context-specific challenges while maintaining methodological rigour, it supports producing nuanced understanding necessary for strengthening African health systems. This framework addresses integration challenges in African primary care research, offering practical tools for doctoral researchers and established investigators navigating complex health phenomena in resource-constrained settings.
Keywords
mixed methods; African health research; primary health care; integration framework; implementation research; health systems research
Sustainable Development Goal
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Metrics
Total abstract views: 221Total article views: 210
Crossref Citations
1. Building the next generation of family medicine and primary health care researchers in Africa
Robert Mash, Klaus von Pressentin
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine vol: 17 issue: 2 year: 2025
doi: 10.4102/PHCFM.v17i2.5274

