Short Reports - Special Collection: Primary Care Research Methods

Phenomenology for primary care researchers

Robert Mash, Febisola Ajudua, Sebaka Malope, Doreen Kaura
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 17, No 2 | a4946 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i2.4946 | © 2025 Robert Mash, Febisola Ajudua, Sebaka Malope, Doreen Kaura | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 February 2025 | Published: 28 May 2025

About the author(s)

Robert Mash, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Febisola Ajudua, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa
Sebaka Malope, Lesotho Boston Health Alliance, Leribe, Lesotho; and Ministry of Health, Maseru, Lesotho
Doreen Kaura, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Primary care researchers often turn to qualitative methodologies to explore people’s perspectives and experiences. Phenomenology is appropriate when the focus is on lived experiences, rather than ideas, beliefs, opinions or perceptions. Phenomenology has its roots in German philosophy and the social sciences, and doctoral students as well as researchers in the health sciences may struggle to understand the paradigm and apply it practically. This article attempts to make sense of the paradigm and two of its key threads, namely descriptive and interpretive phenomenology. The key principles of both approaches and the practical methodological steps are outlined. In addition, examples are given, and the two approaches are compared. Finally, the article discusses trustworthiness and quality criteria in phenomenology.


Keywords

primary care; methodology; phenomenology; descriptive phenomenology; interpretive phenomenology; research methods.

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 362
Total article views: 284


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.