Original Research

Implementation of the framework for disability and rehabilitation in Gauteng, South Africa

Naeema A.R. Hussein El Kout, Sonti I. Pilusa, Natalie Benjamin-Damons, Juliana Kagura
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 17, No 1 | a4930 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4930 | © 2025 Naeema A.R. Hussein El Kout, Sonti I. Pilusa, Natalie Benjamin-Damons, Juliana Kagura | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 16 February 2025 | Published: 03 September 2025

About the author(s)

Naeema A.R. Hussein El Kout, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Sonti I. Pilusa, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Natalie Benjamin-Damons, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Juliana Kagura, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: The Framework and Strategy for Disability and Rehabilitation (FSDR) in South Africa aims to improve rehabilitation services for individuals with disabilities. However, research related to its implementation process is limited.
Aim: To explore the experiences of the implementation process of FSDR among stakeholders in Gauteng, South Africa.
Setting: The study was conducted in 5 districts in the Gauteng Province of South Africa namely, City of Johannesburg, Ekurhuleni, West Rand, Sedibeng, and Tshwane.
Methods: A descriptive qualitative study design was used, combining semi-structured interviews and focus groups with diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, rehabilitation managers and community health workers. Data were analysed thematically using MAXQDA software, with key themes mapped deductively to the stages of the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment) framework to identify key implementation steps taken.
Results: Challenges to implementation including resource shortages, limited career progression, weak management communication and procedural inefficiencies were reported. Participants emphasised the need for policy adaptations reflecting field experiences and advocated for increased accountability and resources. The EPIS framework highlighted the critical role of phase-specific interventions and continuous monitoring for effective policy implementation.
Conclusion: The study concludes that systemic barriers must be addressed to enhance the sustainability and impact of the FSDR policy on rehabilitation services.
Contribution: Recommendations include fostering accountability, improving resource allocation and realigning policies with frontline needs to ensure long-term improvements in disability and rehabilitation services.


Keywords

disability; rehabilitation; policy analysis; implementation science; FSDR; policy processes

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 755
Total article views: 1232

 

Crossref Citations

1. Barriers and facilitators to accessing rehabilitation and healthcare services for persons with disabilities in Gauteng, South Africa: perceptions of policy stakeholders
Naeema Ahmad Ramadan Hussein El Kout, Sonti Imogene Pilusa, Khetsiwe Dlamini-Masuku
European Journal of Physiotherapy  first page: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1080/21679169.2025.2558787

2. A Coordinated Project-Management Approach to Multisite Implementation of Motor-Rehabilitation Programs for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in United States Healthcare Systems: A Narrative Review
Amienye B Omo Enabulele, Iyiola Oyebamiji, Opeyemi Ikubanni, Micah Nnabuko Okwah, Wuraola Susan Babalola, Oyebisi M Azeez, Aliyu O Olaniyi
Cureus  year: 2025  
doi: 10.7759/cureus.100513