Original Research

Exploring the gastric cancer care pathway in South Africa

Anishka Ramadhar, Juliana Kagura, Mazvita Muchengeti, Cameron Gaskill, Natasha Khamisa
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 17, No 1 | a4774 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4774 | © 2025 Anishka Ramadhar, Juliana Kagura, Mazvita Muchengeti, Cameron Gaskill, Natasha Khamisa | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 30 September 2024 | Published: 30 April 2025

About the author(s)

Anishka Ramadhar, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Juliana Kagura, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Mazvita Muchengeti, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; National Cancer Registry, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; and DSI-NRF South African Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Cameron Gaskill, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Natasha Khamisa, Division of Health and Society, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) diagnosis and care data in South Africa (SA) is sparse, and SA has a high GC mortality rate. Mapping the GC care pathway is needed to explore its efficacy in association with the SA GC burden and mortality.

Aim: The study aims to map the GC care pathway in SA from diagnosis to management by healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the GC patient journey and explore barriers and facilitators to the effective flow of the GC care pathway.

Setting: Interviews conducted with South African HCPs were the data source used in this article for analysis. General physicians (GP) were the first contact point with chain-referral sampling sourcing other clinicians.

Methods: Interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams (MS Teams) and Google Meet with qualitative analyses via MAXQDA.

Results: Themes identified were GC care pathway processes, public versus private healthcare system differences and care pathway challenges. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) care is practised for GC in SA, starting with the GP or nurse followed by gastroenterologist (GI), surgeon and pathologist. Thereafter, nurses, dieticians and palliative care specialists are involved. Healthcare sector differences are diagnosis time, GC staging, HCP and treatment access. Challenges include low GC index of suspicion by primary care clinicians (PCC) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) detection.

Conclusion: A MDT approach for optimal treatment and patient care may be the best method for prolonged life.

Contribution: A South African national consensus for GC care via a MDT, emphasising early diagnosis to aid in a robust treatment plan for improved patient outcomes is warranted.


Keywords

gastric cancer; South Africa; care pathway; mapping; multi-disciplinary team; healthcare sector; diagnosis; treatment; management

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 383
Total article views: 194


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.