About the Author(s)


Juliet Nyasulu symbol
School of Clinical Medicine, Division of Community Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

AFRIQUIP, Health Systems Strengthening, Johannesburg, South Africa

Himani Pandya symbol
School of Clinical Medicine, Division of Community Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Citation


Nyasulu J, Pandya H. The effects of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the South African health system: A call to maintain essential health services. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1), a2480. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2480

Note: Special Collection: COVID-19.

Short Report

The effects of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the South African health system: A call to maintain essential health services

Juliet Nyasulu, Himani Pandya

Received: 24 Apr. 2020; Accepted: 04 June 2020; Published: 22 July 2020

Copyright: © 2020. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

South Africa had its first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case on 06 March 2020 in an individual who travelled overseas. Since then, cases have constantly increased and the pandemic has taken a toll on the health system. This requires extra mobilisation of resources to curb the disease and overcome financial loses whilst providing social protection to the poor. Assessing the effects of COVID-19 on South African health system is critical to identify challenges and act timely to strike a balance between managing the emergency and maintaining essential health services. We applied the World Health Organization (WHO) health systems framework to assess the effects of COVID-19 on South African health system, and proposed solutions to address the gaps, with a focus on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and expanded programme on immunisation (EPI) programmes. The emergence of COVID-19 pandemic has direct impact on the health system, negatively affecting its functionality, as depletion of resources to curb the emergency is eminent. Diversion of health workforce, suspension of services, reduced health-seeking behaviour, unavailability of supplies, deterioration in data monitoring and funding crunches are some of the noted challenges. In such emergencies, the ability to deliver essential services is dependent on baseline capacity of health system. Our approach advocates for close collaboration between essential services and COVID-19 teams to identify priorities, restructure essential services to accommodate physical distancing, promote task shifting at primary level, optimise the use of mobile/web-based technologies for service delivery/training/monitoring and involve private sector and non-health departments to increase management capacity. Strategic responses thus planned can assist in mitigating the adverse effects of the pandemic whilst preventing morbidity and mortality from preventable diseases in the population.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; WHO health systems framework building blocks; health systems; essential services; HIV; EPI.

Introduction

In South Africa, since March 06, when the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case was reported, cases have increased to over 188 000 at the time of writing this article.1 This pandemic has called for extra mobilisation of resources to curb the disease and overcome financial loses whilst providing social protection to the poor.2 For decades, the South African health system has shouldered a quadruple burden of diseases (much of which is preventable), with mother and child health indicators far from accepatable targets.3,4 The South African primary healthcare provides both curative and preventive health services. These include under-five child health services, such as growth monitoring and expanded programme on immunisation (EPI); reproductive health services such as family planning, cervical and breast cancer screening, antenatal, labour and postnatal care services; chronic disease care for both communicable and non-communicable diseases including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) services; and many other health promotion, preventative and curative services.5

It is concerning that out of 7.7 million HIV-positive people living in South Africa, about 4.9 million people are on antiretroviral treatment (ART), with one-third (1.6 million) not virally suppressed.6 The current evidence indicates that those virally suppressed are not at higher risk. However, in addition to 1.6 million, we do not know about the other 2 million not on ART, who probably will be at higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection.6,7 South Africa has existing antiretroviral (ARV) and vaccine stock-out challenges because of supply chain constraints.8,9,10,11 In addition, gaps have been identified around low routine immunisation coverage resulting in outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases, such as measles, in South Africa.12 Anecdotal reports show that there is a decline in access to ART from March 2020 by those already initiated on ART. For example, some districts supported by Right to Care (RTC), a President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) partner for Gauteng Province, show increasing numbers of missed appointments to collect ART.13 Similarly, EPI and other essential services are also likely to be affected. Fear of contracting COVID-19, the physical distancing policy and a shift in focus of service providers from basic essential services to COVID-19 pandemic demands may be the reasons for the decline in access to essential services.14

Emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic risks the worsening of existing gaps and increasing deaths as shown in the previous Ebola outbreaks.15,16 The resilience of health system to timely adapt and strike a balance between maintaining routine services and coping with the pandemic is crucial to mitigate the damage.17 Currently, there is a rapid and overwhelming increase in strain on the health system because of COVID-19, overstretching the capacity of healthcare workers to operate effectively.18,19 This article looks at the possible effects of COVID-19 pandemic on the South African health system and proposes possible solutions to maintain the delivery of essential health services whilst fighting the pandemic, with a specific focus on HIV and EPI. We believe that maternity care, child care (e.g. immunisation) and HIV services stand out as the most critical markers and a proxy for the strength of a health system, particularly in the context of South Africa.6,8,12 Resilience of a health system is indicated by its ability to offer basic healthcare services to pregnant women, children and people with HIV. These groups are comparatively more vulnerable and contribute to a high burden of morbidity and mortality at a population level. Lessons from previous epidemics such as Ebola have shown that when there is a threat to a health system, these groups are affected first and to a higher extent.16 Moreover, because of our experience and expertise in working with HIV and immunisation, we selected them as priority services and focus of this article.

Approach

We applied the World Health Organisation (WHO) health systems framework and its six building blocks to assess how COVID-19 pandemic has affected the South African health system (Figure 1).20

FIGURE 1: Conceptual framework (based on World Health Organization building blocks of a health system).

Using the documented existing service delivery gaps, we analysed EPI and HIV programmes as examples of priority essential health services to be maintained by South Africa during this emergency period.6,8,18 In addition, solutions to strike a balance between responding to COVID-19 pandemic and maintenance of these essential services are proposed.

Ethical consideration

This article followed all ethical standards for a research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.

Results

We applied the WHO health systems framework to highlight strengths and gaps in the EPI and HIV service delivery system and explain how these are affected with the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. We have also proposed possible solutions on how to deal with these challenges. The questions raised in the above conceptual framework do not specifically direct our analysis; rather, they serve as a generic guideline for consideration by health managers and stakeholders in order to maintain primary health services during a pandemic. Table 1 summarises these gaps and possible solutions to maintain essential service delivery, with a focus on HIV and EPI.

TABLE 1: Health system risks posed by coronavirus disease 2019 and possible solutions to maintain essential services (according to the World Health Organization health systems framework).

Discussion

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has put great burden on the health system, negatively affecting its functionality. We propose the WHO health systems framework as an approach for assessing and prioritising services by health systems to strike a balance between the responses to COVID-19 pandemic and delivery of quality essential healthcare services, with a focus on EPI and HIV programmes.

Firstly, representation and close collaboration between the COVID-19 and the essential services teams at all levels are recommended. These teams together will need to identify priority essential services within the two programmes and decide which services are to be continued, postponed or suspended.18 At this time, identification of how the emergency is affecting the health system and which geographic areas and vulnerable groups should be prioritised are critical.18,30 Application of the WHO health systems building blocks will provide a systematic and comprehensive approach to the identification of these gaps.20

The next step is to identify and implement solutions to address the gaps worsened or caused by the COVID-19 emergency response. For instance, the redeployment of health workforce, coupled with others being infected with COVID-19, depleted the already existing shortage.19 Therefore, considering task shifting, integration of services, utilisation of senior students, tapping from NGO partners and government workforce outside the Department of Health would alleviate the health workforce shortage.18,19,20,21,22,23,24 The most important task is to provide support to the available health workforce in different aspects needed.31

Admittedly, the COVID-19 physical distancing currently advocated for puts HIV-positive individuals and parents in a dilemma to defer routine appointments, worsening the current gaps in HIV/EPI programme.21 Therefore, in order to ensure positive health-seeking behaviour and adherence to care, there is a need to maintain population’s trust in the capacity of the health system to safely meet essential needs and to control infection risk in health facilities.18 This requires training of health service providers in providing essential services with extra safety to control the spread of COVID-19,18 accompanied by communication with the users and reassurance of access and safety of health services. In times of such pandemics, it is important to ensure that the vulnerable communities including the poor and the elderly have the ability to access these essential services.18,30

Furthermore, existing gaps in immunisation and HIV services including stock-outs have been established, which can worsen when dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.8,9 We therefore propose service delivery approaches that do not attract crowds like CCMDD and outreach services.18,22,23 We also suggest the need to minimise relying on manual operations and paper-based service delivery and monitoring, and utilise information technology and web-based platforms to monitor and conduct its routine operations.26,32 End-user monitoring of the supply chain by patients and civil society has the potential to increase transparency and complement public sector monitoring systems.8

In conclusion, the resilience of the health system is a critical determinant of how a country responds to a pandemic.33 In emergencies like COVID-19, the ability of a health system to deliver essential services is dependent on the existing burden and baseline capacity of the health system. The existing high disease burden would put the South African health system in a fragile state to cope with the pandemic if timely adaptation actions are not taken. The approach proposed in this article, about using WHO building blocks to identify existing gaps, challenges and possible solutions, can be adopted by other low- and middle-income settings to identify priority actions in order to strike a balance between attending to a pandemic and simultaneously maintaining essential services. The authors envisage that applying these principles during such pandemics will lead to informed health systems decisions in striking a balance between emergency response and essential health service delivery, and maintaining of curative and preventive essential health services, which in turn will reduce morbidity and mortality from preventable and treatable diseases.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Susan Goldstein for her input in conceptualising the health systems gaps.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Authors’ contributions

J.N. conceptualised the study and wrote the first draft. J.N. and H.P. were both involved in the writing of the manuscript and approval of the final version.

Funding information

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the authors.

References

  1. National Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD). South Africa certified polio-free [homepage on the Internet]. National Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD); c2019 [cited 2020 July 05]. Available from: https://www.nicd.ac.za/south-africa-certified-polio-free/
  2. SA, President Cyril Ramaphosa: Escalation of measures to combat Coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic [press release]. Government of South Africa; 2020.
  3. Pillay-van Wyk V, Msemburi W, Laubscher R, et al. Mortality trends and differentials in South Africa from 1997 to 2012: Second national burden of disease study. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(9):e642–e653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30113-9
  4. Bradshaw D, Groenewald P, Laubscher R, et al. Initial burden of disease estimates for South Africa, 2000. S Afr Med J. 2003;93(9):682–688.
  5. Bresick G, Von Pressentin KB, Mash R. Evaluating the performance of South African primary care: A cross-sectional descriptive survey. S Afr Fam Pract. 2019;61(3):109–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/20786190.2019.1596666
  6. Pillay Y, editor. Setting the scene: Some data on the HIV epidemic. 9th SA AIDS Conference; 2019 June 11–14; Durban: South African AIDS conference.
  7. Ford N, Vitoria M, Rangaraj A, Norris SL, Calmy A, Doherty M. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of antiretroviral drugs against SARS, MERS, or COVID-19: Initial assessment. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23(4):e25489. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25489
  8. Hwang B, Shroufi A, Gils T, et al. Stock-outs of antiretroviral and tuberculosis medicines in South Africa: A national cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0212405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212405
  9. Mkize V. Nationwide shortage of vital vaccines causes concern. Johannesburg: City Press; 2019.
  10. Ngcobo NJ, Kamupira MG. The status of vaccine availability and associated factors in Tshwane government clinics. S Afr Med J. 2017;107(6):535–538. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i6.12149
  11. Burnett RJ, Mmoledi G, Ngcobo NJ, Dochez C, Seheri LM, Mphahlele MJ. Impact of vaccine stock-outs on infant vaccination coverage: A hospital-based survey from South Africa. Int Health. 2018;10(5):376–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihy036
  12. Hong H, Makhathini L, Mashele M, et al. Annual measles and rubella surveillance review, South Africa. Natl Inst Commun Dis Public Health Surveillance Bull. 2017;16(2):64–77.
  13. MedicalBrief. Right to care: Coronavirus in SA: HIV-positives are skipping treatment and drastic drop in testing. Africa’s Medical Media Digest 2020, New York, NY: Warner Music Group (WMG) Media.
  14. UN. Life-saving vaccinations must not ‘fall victim’ to COVID-19 pandemic – UNICEF chief [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: United Nations; c2020 [cited 2020 Apr 20]. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/03/1060402
  15. Pebody R. No increased coronavirus risk for people with well-controlled HIV says WHO, but how will health systems cope? [homepage on the Internet]. AIDSMAP, London: NAM Publications; 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 20]. Available from https://www.aidsmap.com/news/apr-2020/no-increased-coronavirus-risk-people-well-controlled-hiv-says-who-how-will-health
  16. Elston JWT, Cartwright C, Ndumbi P, Wright J. The health impact of the 2014–15 Ebola outbreak. Public Health. 2017;143:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.10.020
  17. Khan Y, O’Sullivan T, Brown A, et al. Public health emergency preparedness: A framework to promote resilience. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1344. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6250-7
  18. WHO. COVID-19: Operational guidance for maintaining essential health services during an outbreak: Interim guidance 25 March 2020 [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: WHO; c2020 [cited 2020 Apr 08]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331561/WHO-2019-nCoV-essential_health_services-2020.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  19. Victor HM, Toyin Cotties A. Effects of brain drain on the South African health sector: Analysis of the dynamics of its push factors. J Econ Behav Studies. 2017;9(4):62–72. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v9i4.1822
  20. WHO. Everybody’s business, strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes. WHO’s framework for action. WHO Press; 2007.
  21. Doherty M. Latest WHO updates and guidance on COVID-19 and HIV [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: International AIDS Society webinar; c2020 [cited 2020 Apr 03]. Available from: https://www.iasociety.org/HIV-Programmes/Cross-cutting-issues/COVID-19-and-HIV-Webinars
  22. Meyer JC, Schellack N, Stokes J, et al. Ongoing initiatives to improve the quality and efficiency of medicine use within the public healthcare system in South Africa: A preliminary study. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00751
  23. Partapuri T, Steinglass R, Sequeira J. Integrated delivery of health services during outreach visits: A literature review of program experience through a routine immunization lens. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(Suppl 1):S20–S27. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir771
  24. Nyasulu J, Mazwi S, Kgopa M, editors. Nurses ART initiations (NIMART) a tool to promoting ART access and reducing the ART service burden at referral hospitals. Johannesburg: Public Health Association of South Africa (PHASA); 2011.
  25. Mutale W, Chintu N, Amoroso C, et al. Improving health information systems for decision making across five sub-Saharan African countries: Implementation strategies from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(Suppl 2):59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-S2-S9
  26. Rahman A, Ashraf F, Nisha M, et al. Can mHealth improve access to safe blood for transfusion during obstetric emergency? Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:235–243. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S120157
  27. Van Wyk P. Coronavirus personal protective equipment shortage. Maverick: Styli Charalambous; 2020.
  28. Blecher M, Kollipara A, Mansvelder A, Daven J, Marharaj Y, Gaarekwe O. Health spending at a time of low economic growth and fiscal constraint. South Afr Health Rev. 2017;2017(1):25–40.
  29. SA. Solidarity fund: Unity in action [homepage on the Internet]. c2020 [cited 2020 Jun 02]. Available from: https://solidarityfund.co.za/
  30. Bhatt J, Bathija P. Ensuring access to quality health care in vulnerable communities. Acad Med. 2018;93(9):1271–1275. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002254
  31. Adams JG, Walls RM. Supporting the health care workforce during the COVID-19 global epidemic. JAMA. 2020;323(15):1439–1440. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3972
  32. Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: Uses and benefits. Pharm Ther. 2014;39(5):356–364.
  33. Nuzzo JB, Meyer D, Snyder M, et al. What makes health systems resilient against infectious disease outbreaks and natural hazards? Results from a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7707-z


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.