Original Research

Exploring the beliefs and attitudes of private general practitioners towards national health insurance in Cape Town, South Africa

Sheena Mathew, Robert Mash
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 11, No 1 | a2189 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.2189 | © 2019 Sheena Mathew, Robert Mash | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 01 July 2019 | Published: 17 October 2019

About the author(s)

Sheena Mathew, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Robert Mash, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Background: Private general practitioner (GP) participation in the national health insurance (NHI) is necessary to address doctor shortages and achieve universal health coverage. An in-depth understanding of GP’s views on the NHI is needed to inform implementation strategies.

Aim: To explore the beliefs and attitudes of GPs towards the proposed NHI system.

Setting: Cape Town, South Africa.

Methods: This was a descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Eleven GPs were recruited using purposeful snowball sampling from different practices and communities. Thematic data analysis was conducted using the framework approach and Atlas.ti software.

Results: Although GPs saw the need for NHI, they felt that the government was antagonistic towards the private sector and had not engaged in a dialogue. They were wary of integration into a nurse-led primary care system and of being coerced. They felt that the public sector lacked the necessary financial and administrative capacity, and were concerned about the level, efficiency and sustainability of reimbursement, and the criteria to be used to accredit practices. General practitioners anticipated that the NHI would favour multidisciplinary teams and group practices. They also had mixed ideas about the impact on practice with some expecting higher workloads, stress and costs with reduced quality of care, while others saw more comprehensive care, better incomes and increased patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: While GPs are essential for the success of the NHI, there are many concerns regarding government policy, plans for implementation and the consequences for GP practice. Many of the concerns expressed could be tackled by greater policy dialogue and clarification.


Keywords

national health insurance; general practice physicians; primary care; family practice; private practice

Metrics

Total abstract views: 310
Total article views: 117


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.