Original Research

Clinical mentoring to improve quality of care provided at three NIM-ART facilities: A mixed methods study

Chris A. Visser, Jacqueline E. Wolvaardt, David Cameron, Gert J.O. Marincowitz
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine | Vol 10, No 1 | a1579 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1579 | © 2018 Chris A. Visser, Jacqueline E. Wolvaardt, David Cameron, Gert J.O. Marincowitz | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 July 2017 | Published: 14 June 2018

About the author(s)

Chris A. Visser, School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Jacqueline E. Wolvaardt, School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, South Africa
David Cameron, Foundation for Professional Development, Pretoria, South Africa
Gert J.O. Marincowitz, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, University of Limpopo, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Background: The South African Department of Health implemented the nurse-initiated management of antiretroviral treatment (NIM-ART) programme as a policy to decentralise services. Increasing access to ART through nurse initiation results in significant consequences.

Aim: This study evaluated the quality of care provided, the barriers to the effective rollout of antiretroviral services and the role of a clinical mentor.

Setting: The study was conducted at three NIM-ART facilities in South Africa. One clinic provided a high standard of care, one had a high defaulter rate, and at the third clinic, treatment failures were missed, and routine bloods were not collected.

Methods: A mixed methods study design was used. Data were collected using patient satisfaction surveys, review of clinical records, facility audits, focus group interviews, field notes and a reflection diary.

Results: NIM-ART nurses prescribed rationally and followed antiretroviral guidelines.Mortality rates and loss to follow-up rates were lower than those at the surrounding hospitals, and 91.1% of nurse-monitored patients had an undetectable viral load after a year. The quality of care provided was comparable to doctor-monitored care. The facility audits found recurrent shortages of essential drugs. Patients indicated a high level of satisfaction. Salary challenges,
excessive workload, a lack of trained nurses and infrastructural barriers were identified as barriers. On-going mentoring and support by a clinical mentor strengthened each of the facilities, facilitated quality improvement and stimulated health workers to address constraints.

Conclusion: Clinical mentors are the key to addressing institutional treatment barriers and ensuring quality of patient care.


Keywords

NIM-ART; HIV, AIDS; quality; mentor; action research

Metrics

Total abstract views: 109
Total article views: 171


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.